News -> INDReporter FRI, APR 13 10:17AM by Walter Pierce

Durel seeks RedFlex referendum

joey
                                                   Durel                Photo by Robin May

The administration of City-Parish President Joey Durel will put the City-Parish Council on the spot Tuesday with a vote on a resolution that would authorize Durel to begin renegotiating consolidated government’s contract with RedFlex, the company that operates the red-light cameras and speed vans on city streets in Lafayette. The vote will be a barometer for the council’s willingness to scrap electronic enforcement of city traffic laws; three Tea Party-backed council members — Chairman Jared Bellard (District 5), Vice Chair William Theriot (9) and Andy Naquin (5) — sponsored but later pulled an ordinance that would let the RedFlex contract expire in June. A source tells The Ind the trio didn’t have the votes to pass the ordinance. The council in late March got an ad-naseum presentation on the benefits of the SafeLight/SafeSpeed program, a PowerPoint extravaganza that went until nearly midnight.

Durel tells The Advocate he simply wants some direction from the council; if the panel votes down the resolution — a signal that an ordinance letting the contract expire will be approved — then there’s little value in beginning negotiations with RedFlex. In this respect, the resolution serves as a referendum on the program, which some council members have signaled they’d like to tweak by, among other things, only ticketing motorists for running red lights, not issuing citations for speeding. The council will conduct a vote on May 15 on an ordinance for final adoption that would let the contract expire.

In January, Director of Traffic and Transportation Tony Tramel, whose department oversees SafeLight/SafeSpeed, issued a status report on the program demonstrating its success in reducing collisions and changing driver behavior. Among the data in the report was evidence that the program sharply reduced collisions at intersections where speed cameras are located. Tramel wrote at the time that “reduction of traffic crashes appears to reflect a significant positive improvement in reducing traffic crashes related to driver behavior, which was originally identified as the principal purpose of the SafeLight/SafeSpeed programs. This reduction in traffic crashes increases the efficiency of the traffic control and traffic flow efforts, and decreases the number of serious traffic crashes to which public safety agencies must respond at the expense of taxpayers, thereby contributing to the overall public safety of Lafayette and ultimately the citizens of Lafayette.”

The SafeLight/SafeSpeed program generated just over $2 million in revenue last through citations for speeding and running red lights. LCG and RedFlex roughly split the revenue. Some opponents of the program argue it is less about promoting traffic safety and more about generating revenue, a dubious claim in light of the fact that less than one tenth of one percent of the more than 60 million vehicles that have passed through the camera-equipped intersections has received a citation.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (9)add
...
written by Stephen Donaldson , April 13, 2012 - 12:23 pm
IT is ABSOLUTELY ABOUT THE MONEY!

GO PULL THE "VIOLATIONS" of the RLC.

You will find most "violations" are:

1. right turn on red
2. split seconds straight thrus that longer ambers solved.
3. stopping on or over the stop line.

COME ON I DARE YOU TO GO LOOK! The Vendors KNOW.

IN CA Loma Linda stopped getting reports on right turns just before they pulled the plug on redflex. http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/33/3345.asp Quote: "Redflex held the deficit over our heads since the contract stated that they would forgive the deficit only at the end of the term," Mayor Rhodes Rigsby told TheNewspaper. "Redflex apparently stopped separating the statistics for straights, lefts and rights to prevent me from further reporting of their perfidious business model."


On another Vendor ATS. Their Survey showed most "violations" were RIGHT TURNS on ONE WA town! http://www.banthecams.org/attachments/1553_ATS Mukilteo survey.pdf

Don't buy hook line and sinker the Redflex PR machine (or for that matter their front group. http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/37/3744.asp

www.motorists.org
www.banthecams.org
and camerafraud on Facebook!
...
written by James Walker , April 13, 2012 - 10:10 pm
If the yellow intervals on the lights were made 1.0 seconds longer, it would almost certainly reduce violations by MORE than the ticket cameras. Without improper engineering, red light cameras lose money - often a LOT of money - and are then removed.
See the science on our website. James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, www.motorists.org, Ann Arbor, MI
...
written by Roger Jones , April 14, 2012 - 09:59 am
James Walker is correct. If red light running is a concern, lengthen the yellow light time. Add one second and 90% of straight thru's will disappear.
...
written by Michael A. Moss , April 14, 2012 - 04:07 pm
I know the light at Johnston & S. College changes real quick. And the yellow light is very short. What's up with that?
...
written by Jack Cormier , April 14, 2012 - 07:26 pm
it seems possible to me that if the problem drivers at Lafayette intersections are given an extra second on the yellow light interval, they will probably become even bolder when trying to "make it thru" the intersection to beat the red light.

might be worth it to try and monitor the
results but lets keep the cameras just to make sure it works before we decide for sure.
...
written by chano leal , April 16, 2012 - 03:20 pm
Oh Jack! You must definetly be on the LCG government hind teat, how about we just insist Redflex lengthen the amber light duration period by two seconds ( Thats 2 Seconds, Jack )and I'll post a hundred to a Meche's Donut, that the Redflex fine monies will decrease greatly, lets stop having our local citizens/taxpayers support some jackleg inbred family member of the local elite with a huge share in the Redflex company, after all the company name of Red"flex should promote flexibility, or is the "Flex part-name to throw off the citizens/taxpayers and to continue financially, benefiting, the In-bred Elite familys.
...
written by chano leal , April 16, 2012 - 03:35 pm
Oh, and Jack Cornrear are you the as yet un-identifiable LCG spokesperson, and pray tell, are you a new-hire with the Redflex firm ? IF The duration of the Amber lighting has not been altered to allow Redflex to target more drivers, I'll kiss your Cornrear on Jefferson Street. How about you stop labeling every citizen who is targeted and falsely ticketed by Redflex, through the LCG short-adjustment of the caution light timing stay, "TROUBLE DRIVERS ". Who elected you Poster Boy of the Redflex banner ?
...
written by chano leal , April 16, 2012 - 03:37 pm
Yes, I've been away, but like Arnold Swaztnegger, I Be Bac !
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it