News -> INDReporter MON, MAY 21 11:26AM by Walter Pierce

Simply put: La. members of Congress are sophomore-ish

 

speechLouisiana’s representation in Congress — two senators and seven representatives — is dead-on average when it comes to the level of sophistication at work in their speeches delivered in their respective chambers. The state’s congressional delegation averaged out at a 10.6 grade level for the complexity of their speeches, based on an analysis by the Sunlight Foundation, a non-partisan open-government group whose researchers ran the Congressional Record through a computer algorithm.

The most troubling aspect of the data is not that the Louisiana delegation speaks collectively at the level of a sophomore in high school; it’s that the entire Congress’ speech has fallen nearly a full grade level since 2005 — from 11.5 seven years ago — when the Sunlight Foundation began rating congressional speeches.

One could argue — and I’ll take some heat for this no doubt — that the numbers reveal the Tea Party having a dumbing-down effect on Congress: Of the 20 members with the lowest scores for grade-level speech, 85 percent are Republicans, 65 percent are freshmen and 90 percent are members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Buttressing this supposition, Rep. Jeff Landry, R-New Iberia and a freshman GOP member of the Tea Party Caucus, scored the lowest in the Bayou State delegation. Landry, according to Sunlight, orates at the 8.6 grade level — that’s 518th among the 531 members or 13th worst. The self-styled Cajun conservative, a lawyer by training, does favor the home-spun and colloquial, which no doubt had an adverse effect on his score.

U.S. Rep. Rodney Alexander, a Monroe Republican, is highest in the delegation — and high among all members of Congress — coming in at 13.9 or seventh best overall. The remainder of the delegation is all over the map but tends to be below average (I guess we can thank Alexander’s erudition for lifting the state’s composite score): In ascending order from the bottom are Rep. Bill Cassidy (9.3 or 496 out of 531 members), Rep. John Fleming (10.0 or 457), Rep. Cedric Richmon (10.1/449), Rep. Steve Scalise (10.8/392), Sen. Mary Landrieu (10.8/388), Rep. Charles Boustany (11.2/327) and Sen. David Vitter (11.4/289).

Here’s some perspective via the Sunlight Foundation’s report:

By comparison, the U.S. Constitution is written at a 17.8 grade level, the Federalist Papers at a 17.1 grade level, and the Declaration of Independence at a 15.1 grade level. The Gettysburg Address comes in at an 11.2 grade level and Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech is at a 9.4 grade level. Most major newspapers are written at between an 11th and 14th grade level.

Read the report here:


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (8)add
...
written by Matthew Rowzee , May 21, 2012 - 05:25 pm
I'm failing to see the issue or the value in this study.
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , May 21, 2012 - 06:26 pm
I find that many of the best speech givers or presenters are often the most ineffective doers, so, I also fail to see any real value in this study. Charles Boustany speaks at an 11.2 grade level, but is a heart surgeon? Me thinks he made it past the 12th grade, even if he speaks at the level of an 11.2 grader. That's a dumb study. It sounds like a waste of taxpayer money.
...
written by Walter Pierce , May 21, 2012 - 06:31 pm
No taxpayer money involved, Dud. As the article indicates, the group did it "just for fun." And I posted it because I had a cool illustration idea. That's all.
But I do find the article interesting and I think a case can be made that the Tea Party has dumbed down Congress.
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , May 21, 2012 - 06:44 pm
Glad to hear no taxpayer money is being used for that. The Gettysburg address at 11.2 also? Most major newspapers written between an 11th and 14th grade level. At what level do you think 'The Independent' is written? Even more interesting, at what level do you, Walter, write at? ;)
...
written by Mitchell Douget , May 21, 2012 - 06:54 pm
But I do find the article interesting and I think a case can be made that the Tea Party has dumbed down Congress.


Of the twenty that you use as an example, 18 are members of Congress -- that leaves 513 members of Congress -- before you make a blanket statement that the Tea Party, is dumbing down Congress, you need to show how many of the other 513 Congressmen are members of the Tea Party -- or is it your contention that these 18 control Congress
...
written by Walter Pierce , May 21, 2012 - 06:58 pm
I've little doubt, Dudley, in light of the many and sundry grammatical trappings I routinely festoon my prose with that I'm operating in an elevated, oxygen-deprived clime where only linguistic angels dare tread.
;)
...
written by Walter Pierce , May 21, 2012 - 07:04 pm
Maybe the story isn't clear, Mitchell: Of the 20 LOWEST SCORING members of Congress the majority shares three characteristics: Republican, freshman and House members (as opposed to Senate).
The GOP took over the House a couple of years ago due in large part to a wave of Tea Party members -- Republican and freshmen -- beating mainstream GOP candidates.
So I'm making an inference not a deduction.
...
written by Eric Yongue , May 21, 2012 - 08:32 pm
I would assume that of all the skills a congressman would need to get elected excellent
great communication skills would be number one. Poor communicators simply don't win many congressional seats. So I can't say that I agree with your guess that the lack of sophisticated speeches is caused by dumber members of congress that can't help but communicate poorly.

Speeches in congress are no longer delivered for the ears of congressmen. Indeed most speeches and debates are delivered before a nearly empty chamber. In the vast majority of cases the intended audience for these speeches is the electorate. And I think this gradual change in audience can explain the drop in sophistication. Since there are a large number of Americans who can't write or comprehend past a 10th or 11th grade reading level it makes perfect sense to tone down the "sophistication" so they can get your message as well.

Huey Long was known as one of the most brilliant communicators of his time. He was considered a genius by many. When he spoke in front of a group of Lawyers he would use sophisticated
language. But when he spoke to the everyman he toned it down big time. He used their unsophisticated sayings and truisms. And spoke at a level that they could understand and relate to even if it was only at a 6th grade level. And just because those speeches weren't sophisticated didn't mean Long himself wasn't sophisticated. The same reasoning should apply to our congressmen.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it