News -> INDReporter THU, MAY 24 11:28AM by Walter Pierce

Rep. Landry least hypocritical among Tea Party frosh

The 15 freshman GOP representatives in the House Tea Party Caucus rode a populist, anti-bailout wave into Congress in 2010, castigating the federal government for its bailouts of Wall Street and the auto industry and their attendant contribution to the national debt. If they shared one thing in common it was the ire they reserved especially for the Wall Street “Too Big to Fail” bailout, otherwise known as the Troubled Assets Relief Program, a Bush administration initiative they hung around the neck of Bush’s successor.

Yet according to an analysis of federal campaign contributions, voting records and public statements by the 15 conducted by the group ThinkProgress, each of those Tea Party freshmen has taken thousands of dollars from political action committees representing TARP-rescued financial institutions — most have also taken campaign cash from the American Bankers Association — and now they’re effectively shills for Wall Street. What an amazing transformation. Not.

It turns out that Rep. Jeff Landry, R-New Iberia, is the least compromised among the group in terms of accepting gold from the dragon he promised to slay. According to ThinkProgress’ tabulation, Landry only received $2,800 from PACs representing TARP-rescued institutions, and he received nothing from the ABA. In fact, Landry was the only member of the group to receive no contributions from the ABA. That’s a far cry from the gargantuan haul of Rep. Stephen Fincher of Tennessee, whose coffer swelled by more than $156,000 thanks to cash from TARP entities and the American Bankers Association.

Twelve of the 15 have signed on as co-sponsors of House Resolution 3461, otherwise known as the Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act, a Wall Street-friendly piece of legislation characterized by Americans for Financial Reform as a way to “tilt the playing field further in the direction of excessive deference to industry interests and tie the hands of regulators attempting to protect the public interest.” In other words, a way to decrease federal oversight over the industry that crashed the U.S. into the Great Recession. The ABA has lobbied heavily — and dropped plenty of cash — for passage of HR 3461.

Landry joined on as a sponsor of the bill in March, as did his opponent this fall, Rep. Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette, who co-signed five days after Landry.

The Tea Party freshmen: From Earl Grey to Da Hong Pao.

Read more here.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (3)add
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , May 24, 2012 - 05:49 pm
Hey Walter, both parties take money from the 'dragons they've promised to slay.' Crudely put, they all 'suck'....money from wherever they can get it. Regulators attempting to protect the public interest is a joke. You've heard of Bernie Madoff? This is one example of an individual who could have been busted many years ago by regulators, but they did not do their jobs. They didn't need more money to hire more people in order to regulate. They didn't need more regulatory authority. They just needed to verify what they were being told. Now, the fees I pay to regulatory agencies have doubled and tripled in some cases and new ones have been invented to pay for more lazy bastards that need a paycheck, therefore reducing my profit margins, unless, of course, I pass it on to my clients, which is exactly what happens most of the time. I haven't done that to my clients, yet. The answer for me is to get more clients and learn to accept tighter margins, but I don't have shareholders to answer to. The real problem is that the morality of our society is deteriorating IMHO. The bubble economy we live in today has been in the making for many years during the tenure of both political parties. We all want instant gratification, with no consequences. Anyway, books can and have been written about all of these topics, and I am no writer, just venting a little. ;(
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , May 24, 2012 - 07:17 pm
By the way, Walter, would one of your paper's investigative journalists like to investigate, or should I say, bring attention to, the following: I was awakened at approximately 1:00 a.m. recently to a text message informing me of an opportunity to purchse a subscription to the 'Joke of the Day,' I now know I am supposed to respond to this message with a return text of the word, STOP, or I can call my wireless provider and ask them to block these kinds of communications. Unfortunately, what I initially replied with was a different phrase, which is better left unspoken in this family-friendly forum (did I mention it was 1:00 a.m.). I did reply with, STOP, on my third response to those creeps that morning, but guess what, I received my bill yesterday, and had been charged $9.99 by these scumbags. This is when I called my service provider and was instructed to have this stuff blocked if I liked. I liked, but that business practice is just plain low down and dirty, modern day thievery, and everyone should complain about it!
...
written by Matthew Rowzee , May 25, 2012 - 10:32 pm
How many financial institutions were forced to take the bail out? You might want to investigate the answer to that question before calling out the Tea Party.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it