Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s office has given the Louisiana Ethics Board the green light to enter into consent opinions with persons accused of ethics violations. The board sought Caldwell’s advice amid concerns that the Ethics Adjudicatory Board, a seven-member panel of administrative law judges created by Gov. Bobby Jindal’s ethics reforms, has the authority over consent opinions. Since the creation of the EAB, several questions of jurisdiction among the Ethics Board and the EAB have arisen, causing in some cases a halt to ethics enforcement functions such as collecting fines.
Before the creation of the EAB, consent opinions were a routine way for the board to settle ethics-violations matters with the accused, allowing them to voluntarily sign off on the ethics charge and agree to a penalty. The consent opinion allows someone who violates the ethics code to avoid the cost and publicity of a public hearing.
Caldwell’s opinion could help clear up other issues that have clouded matters of jurisdiction for the board and the EAB:
The Board also questions whether it has the authority to offer consent opinions under the Ethics Code. The consent opinion provision states that the board shall consider offering a consent opinion to each person who is the subject of an investigation. The opinion request letter expresses doubt as to which board is referred to therein. This uncertainty is misplaced. Throughout the Ethics Code the use of the term board refers exclusively to the Board of Ethics. The statutes use the terms Ethics Adjudicatory Board and adjudicatory board when referring to the Ethics Adjudicatory Board . We find no credible basis for the interpretation of the term board in La SR14C3d1421 to refer to any entity other than the Board of Ethics.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 20 The Robertson family is playing hardball in their dispute with A&E, the network that airs the wildly profitable "reality" show about their family, Duck Dynasty. Patriarch Phil Robertson was suspended by the network after GQ printed an interview with him that contained his (unedited) comments about gay and black folks. Here's a link to their statement, in which they say they can't imagine the show without papa and announcing that they are in negotiations with A&E about the future of the show.
DEC 20 Blogger Robert Mann (also a journalism prof at LSU and thus an authority on the First Amendment) says something in this post of which a lot of Fox News anchors and internet trolls should take heed: the Constitution says you have freedom of speech. It does not say you can't face consequences for what you say. He also takes a look at what our governor has to say -- and ole Bobby had to drag Miley Cyrus into it.
DEC 20 Blogger Tom Aswell says Governor Bobby Jindal has now had more to say about the comments a "reality" star made about gay and black people than he has had to say about the problems in his own voucher program or the sinkhole in Bayou Corne. In fact, Tom points out, Bobby's all over the Phil Robertson "issue" like "a duck on a June bug."
DEC 20 Here's an interesting post from blogger Katie East in DIG Magazine about celebrity passings. She understands why so many would be sad because of Mandela's passing -- he was an international figure, a political figure, an activist. But there is similar wailing following the passing of people who may not have had the same impact, she says -- like the guy who starred in the Fast and Furious movies. She wants to know: why is that?
DEC 20 Columnist James Gill writes about Louisiana's embattled voucher program in this post. Just because a child attends a private school does not mean he's going to get a good education, Gill writes. Gov. Jindal likes to say the program helps kids get a great education, but whether it does that is open to "considerable doubt," Gill writes.
DEC 20 Gambit's Clancy DuBos writes about the NOLA mayor's race in this post. For a while, it was assumed that it would be a quiet one, given the amount of money Mitch has in the bank. But at the last minute, a (possibly) formidable candidate threw his hat in the ring. The question is, Clancy says, why?
DEC 20 In Louisiana's education system, the state takes over a school that is designated as "failing." The assumption is, that's a good thing and will produce improvement. But is that the case? Blogger Mike Deshotels takes a look at how takeovers perform in one area of testing, the ACT.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly