As two Louisiana teacher’s unions move forward with lawsuits in an effort to block the use of public school dollars on private/parochial school educations, a 2010 lawsuit challenging the state’s public school-funding formula could have even more damaging implications for the state if successful in court.
According to a report from The Alexandria Town Talk, the target of the two union lawsuits challenging the method through which the state plans to fund Gov. Bobby Jindal’s private school voucher program — the state’s Minimum Foundation Program — is also tied to a 2010 lawsuit filed on behalf of St. Helena Parish teachers and school board members who contend that the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education’s use of local sales tax collections as a determinant in how much money each school district receives from the state is an illegal practice that has cost local school districts a combined $4.8 billion since 2007.
MFP breaks down into a per-pupil dollar amount that the state gives local school boards. It’s calculated through a complex formula that factors in both local and state dollars, with the state’s allocation being “the total — minus the local portion,” explains Brian Blackwell, the attorney representing St. Helena in the lawsuit:
The primary law addressed in the lawsuit is R.S.17, Section 97.1 ... the law states “no portion of the proceeds derived from any sales tax levied and collected by a parish or city school board shall be used or taken into consideration in any formula adopted by the Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and submitted to the legislature for approval.”
Joan Hunt, general counsel for the state Department of Education, acknowledged Friday that local sales tax “is a factor in the calculation of local wealth. That’s the subject of the lawsuit.”
Asked whether that practice conflicts with the law, she said “That’s their argument. A court will decide this.”
She said she would not comment on the state’s case because “it is ongoing litigation.”
BESE did try to get the lawsuit dismissed as having no merit but Judge Wilson Fields, who is handling the case, threw those motions out.
Blackwell said that based on his research, BESE’s including sales taxes in the calculation reduced school systems’ receipts statewide an average of between $800 million and $900 million a year.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 10 The state's tax amnesty program paid off in a big way, with more money collected than expected, Jeremy Alford writes in LaPolitics. There are laws that govern how that money is supposed to be spent -- but surely the leges will find a way around that, Alford predicts. After all, it has happened before: if there's one thing we're good at, it's robbing Peter to pay Paul.
DEC 10 Tom Aswell continues his coverage of the New Bethany Home for Girls in this post. Although the school shut down years ago, the story has been revived -- especially after several former residents returned to Arcadia last week to file sexual assault complaints against the man who ran the school. Only two of the women filed complaints; the others came (from other states) to lend support. It's a compelling story Tom tells here.
DEC 10 Blogger CB Forgotston isn't buying what the legislature's selling (to itself) regarding Louisiana's fiscal outlook. Leges are telling everybody they don't need to worry about mid-year budget cuts. The Legislative Fiscal Office's predictions aren't being questioned like they should -- except by reporters, CB says.
DEC 10 The Picayune's Jarvis DeBerry writes about Nelson Mandela in this post. The former President of South Africa, who died last week, was not the simple, sanitized "cuddly" guy being portrayed in the simple-minded, easily-distracted American pop media, he says. He's hoping that Mandela's legacy will not receive the same "whitewash" that has been perpetrated against MLK.
DEC 10 Sen. David Vitter's continued efforts to force a vote on lawmakers' health care doesn't pass the "moral high ground test," columnist Stephanie Grace writes in this post. There's no "real policy argument" here and the vote he's trying to force (in true Vitter style, by embarrassing his colleagues) will accomplish "almost nothing" except hurting people, she says. So if he runs for guv and wins, we can look forward to more pointless, empty political posturing? Great.
DEC 10 So who is behind David Vitter's SuperPAC? Blogger Bucktown Pirate takes a look in this post on the Kingfish. With "the internets" and "a modicum of free time," Pirate has done some digging and it's pretty interesting stuff. So why should citizens have to do this much digging to find out who is behind organizations that raise tons of money then spent to influence elections? Good question.
DEC 10 Bob Marley's children and widow have sued Raising Cane's for use of the words "One Love," this blog post on Spin says. The words were registered by the chicken chain years ago, but the family says they're owed damages, attorney fees and all profits attributed to the use because it also was the name of a song recorded by Bob Marley with the Wailers.
DEC 10 Here's Gambit's take on Gov. Jindal's refusal (so far) to take the Medicaid expansion money. He's done this before, the editorial post says: posture and pose for the cameras, then show up in a dark alley to take the money anyway. That time, he handed out the money using big goofy checks with his name as the payer, the post reminds us. So he's not "entirely allergic" to federal bucks after all, the post says.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly