News -> INDReporter FRI, JUN 29 12:16PM by Leslie Turk

LPTFA attorney, board complicit in ethical dilemma

[UPDATE: The Independent has learned that Lafayette City-Parish Council Vice Chairman William Theriot has asked City-Parish attorney Mike Hebert for guidance in requesting that the Legislative Auditor be called in to audit LPTFA. Theriot emailed Hebert early Friday morning.]

Now that the Louisiana Board of Ethics has filed charges against development consultant Greg Gachassin, it’s time for Lafayette government's leaders to turn their attention to the complicit role of the Lafayette Public Trust Financing Authority's attorney and board members.

The Independent was first to report that on June 14 the Louisiana Board of Ethics voted to charge the Lafayette developer and his Cartesian Co. with violating the state’s Code of Governmental Ethics while he was a member of the LPTFA’s board of trustees and again after he resigned from the LPTFA board. The Ethics Board’s action is much like filing a civil lawsuit against Gachassin; within the next four to six months the Ethics Adjudicatory Board, a three-member panel of administrative law judges, will conduct a hearing on the charges, determine whether they should stick and assess a penalty based on the Ethics Board’s recommendation.

In filing the charges, the Ethics Board spells out how the local developer laid the foundation for lucrative work with the LPTFA while he was serving as an appointed board member from November 2003 to November 2009. His alleged violations involved Villa Gardens, a single-family low-income development on Patterson Street, and Cypress Trails, a low-income apartment complex on Sophie Street in north Lafayette. In both cases, Gachassin’s Cartesian Co. signed $500,000 consulting contracts with partnerships associated with those projects, which were backed financially and/or initiated by the LPTFA, a public trust organized by the state in 1979 primarily to help develop low-income housing in Lafayette. Gachassin has a similar consulting contract with the controversial Joie de Vivre development (that Thursday changed its name to Uptown Lofts), a gig he’ll make about $1 million on, and the Lofts at Olivier, two downtown projects spearheaded by the LPTFA.

Late Thursday night, Tea Party of Lafayette member and community activist Carol Ross sent an email to the Lafayette City-Parish Council asking the council to do everything in its power to get to the bottom of this ethical dilemma that — at least for now — appears to officially be limited to Gachassin’s role. “It would be in the best interest of Lafayette Consolidated Government and the taxpayers to get to the bottom of this sad affair,” Ross writes. “I strongly urge that the council ask for the Legislative Auditor to come in and get all the facts, just as they did with regard to Mr. Gachassin. It would go a long way toward assuring the public that programs are being run for the good of the people, not just those who stand to profit from them.”

We could not agree more. The Independent also was first to question whether Gachassin should have ever been allowed to step into the role of development consultant on these projects in its April 2011 cover story, “How Gachassin Games the System.” Here’s a snippet from that story:

Notably, no one — not one of the trustees, John Arceneaux (who replaced Gachassin as chairman), Julius James Stagg IV, Ryan L. Marine and D.E. “Dusty” Dought, or longtime LPTFA attorney Richard Becker — raised any questions about Gachassin returning as a paid consultant, according to the minutes of the meeting. Nor did anyone bother to check with the Louisiana Board of Ethics on whether Gachassin going to work for the LPTFA’s own development would constitute a violation of the state’s ethics laws. ...

It could very well be that none of his fellow trustees was surprised when Gachassin appeared before them on behalf of the project — Dought was absent — because when LPTFA was awarded the low-income  housing tax credits from the state in October 2009, Gachassin notified the LPTFA that he intended to resign and become a consultant on the project, according to Becker. By the time he appeared as a consultant, Gachassin had filed paperwork with the Louisiana Secretary of State’s office, creating The Cartesian Company at 326 Settlers Trace Blvd. in River Ranch. In January 2010 he announced its creation in a press release, calling it a real estate development and finance solutions company, specializing in development, project management, capital solutions and public-private partnerships. ...

Becker says because of the 2008 ethics revisions he wanted assurances from Gachassin that — “in [Gachassin’s] opinion” — his serving as a consultant on the project would not violate the law. Becker believes such ethical considerations were Gachassin’s alone, saying he asked that Gachassin perform the necessary due diligence and report back to LPTFA: “In a subsequent conversation with Mr. Gachassin, he advised me as counsel to the LPTFA that he had indeed performed such due diligence and that after consideration and review concluded that the proposed consulting agreement with CTLP was not a violation of the Louisiana Ethics Code.”
In a review of years of the LPTFA’s minutes for that story, The Independent could find no documentation of any such conversation. Because he did not protect the best interests of the LPTFA in this matter by doing his own due diligence, Becker should answer for his inaction, too. As should the LPTFA board members at the time.

becker
LPTFA attorney Richard Becker
We also need to keep in mind that each of these projects was partially financed through federal low-income housing tax credits awarded by the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, taxpayer money, and we hope the feds are also taking a look at whether there was any impropriety on the part of any of those involved in pulling these deals together.

“I have followed the unfolding events at LPTFA and the ethics charges against Mr. Gachassin with considerable interest and dismay,” Ross continues in her email. “Comments made by several of the principals in these very unsettling events lead me to question who is really calling the shots at LPTFA and should there be expansion of the investigation. First, the published quotes by the current chairman of LPTFA make it sound almost as though the trustees are observers in this troubling episode waiting to receive more information from the Board of Ethics, when in actual fact, the LPTFA trustees are participants and signatories to the very documents which form the basis for the ethics charges. ... There are very complex issues involved and with the filing of the ethics charges against the former chairman, Mr. Gachassin, I believe a thorough investigation of LPTFA and its activities is clearly warranted, especially in light of the recent proposal for LPTFA to take over programs and receive the funding to run them from LCG.”

There is no question that the housing opportunities LPTFA provides are desperately needed in this community, evidenced by hundreds of residents showing up at the Domingue Rec Center Tuesday morning to apply for Section 8 Rental Assistance Program vouchers from the Lafayette Housing Authority. The LHA was so overwhelmed by the need that it later announced it would move to a lottery system for the program. The LPTFA is doing good work, but at what cost? It’s time for Lafayette government, the beneficiary of this public trust, and the Lafayette City-Parish Council, which appoints its board of trustees, to stop turning a blind eye to what is indeed a sad affair.


Comments (4)add
...
written by Krista Fontenot , June 30, 2012 - 12:51 am
Leslie, I have questions:

isn't mike hebert a law partner with the lptfa's attorney, Richard Becker?

Did anyone every find out why the Joie De Vivre housing project suddenly passed the Section 106 review. From what I was told, it failed 4 times until scott angelle, the architects brother, had brandon Badinger replaced. Could this be true?

Will the city council take into account that greg gachassin and glen angelle donate money to brandon shelvin's campain, (Joey's too) and that greg gachassin built a another housing project in nothern lafayette with maybe boudreaux's blessing , is that right?
...
written by Leslie Turk , June 30, 2012 - 02:15 pm
[Editor's Note: The Independent received the following email from LPTFA board member Celeste White Friday afternoon. With her permission, we have posted the letter.]

Ms. Turk and Mr. Pierce,

I became an LPTFA trustee in November of last year because I believed in its mission. I still believe in its mission. I'd like my community to believe in it as well. I hope you can help me with this last bit.

It is clear to me, given public comments made at the last four LPTFA board meetings and the spate of articles printed (or posted) in recent months by various media outlets regarding matters before and decisions by the board, that the public is due an explanation of LPTFA's origins, purpose, and intentions. I plan to present to the board at the next meeting a resolution calling for a public presentation, to take place between now and September, during which we will outline those items.

In the mean time, I invite the public to explore our web site (lptfa.org) to get an idea of the types of projects that, in addition to the low- to middle-income housing developments mentioned in Ms. Turk's article, convinced me that becoming a trustee was a unique, worthwhile investment of my volunteered time. A cursory glance will show you that the Trust, for example, provided an $850,000 grant to Lafayette City-Parish Government for the development and construction of the beautiful Rosa Parks Multi-Modal Transportation Center, a $125,000 donation towards the design and construction of UL Lafayette's award-winning BeauSoleil Solar Home, a $400,000 no-interest loan in support of the UL Lafayette Building Institute's efforts to build urban, green, infill homes (including the Event House located at Madison and Olivier Streets that was featured in a photo shoot in your paper a few weeks ago). We've also pledged a $2 million contribution to the city of Lafayette for the development of a public park on the property currently known as The Horse Farm.

A particular point of recent public contention involves LPTFA's dealings with and development of the former Acadiana Outreach Center campus. In an effort to admit sunlight to the Trust's processes and decisions regarding that property, at our March 16th meeting we passed the following resolutions with regard to the development of that campus:

1. [A resolution d]irecting and authorizing the LPTFA, acting by and through its officers, attorneys and authorized representatives to develop a master plan for the property owned by the LPTFA adjacent to the Joie De Vivre project (the "Adjacent Campus"). The master plan for the Adjacent Campus (the "Master Plan") shall be developed through public meetings with stakeholders, neighborhood groups and any other interested parties and groups in order to involve all interested parties and consider all public input in the development of the Master Plan; and
2. [A resolution that i]n connection with the implementation of the Master Plan approved by the Trustees, the Chairman shall authorize and direct the publishing of a request for proposals to be advertised and distributed in accordance with applicable law to solicit proposals from developers for the development of the Adjacent Campus pursuant to the Master Plan.

The first of the Master Plan public meetings is scheduled to take place July 16th at the Rosa Parks Transportation Center. I encourage anyone interested to attend, discuss their objectives and concerns, and speak candidly with LPTFA trustees. Once the Master Plan is developed, keep an eye out for the Trust's RFP notices.

Thank you for your time and have a great weekend.

Best,
Celeste White
LPTFA Trustee
...
written by Michael A. Moss , June 30, 2012 - 05:56 pm
Does anyone have any idea why the conflicts, relationships, back door deals, etc. are never investigated. Does the administration of the City of Lafayette even give a $*!T about the taxpayers? Isn't it ironic that they will investigate a traffic light violation to the fullest. But, not this!! What's up wit dat!!??? Lucky they didn't take any water!!
...
written by Krista Fontenot , June 30, 2012 - 10:39 pm
Ms white, thanks for the letter and openness, but it does not excuse the abuse.

Michael, I think part of the problem is plain ole buddy buddy crap! gachassin give to shelvin, i think he give to joey, why would they oppose him. arceneaux and becker both served with gachassin on the lpta for the past several years, why would they stop him? i'm sure this is typical or more than just this orginization in the city. I (unfortunaely for me) have had the pleasure of seeing this bs at my own front door. i'm sure if we investigate in other neighborhoods and/or contriversies, well'll find more of the same abuse, I can't belive any of them can look themselves in the mirror, or maybe they're just making too much public funded money to care.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it