Motorists who rack up substantial fines for speeding and red-light running via citations issued through the SafeLight/SafeSpeed program could face a tougher, more determined-to-collect Lafayette Consolidated Government in the near future. The City-Parish Council will vote Tuesday on an ordinance that amends and clarifies the city code for collections of outstanding fines. The ordinance would also move oversight of the program from the Traffic & Transportation Department to the chief of police.
More than $6 million in outstanding fines is owed to LCG, The Advocate reports, citing a presentation this spring by the Traffic Department. LCG has always had the authority to bring people to court to collect fines as well as to refer them to collection agencies. The ordinance before the council delineates a clear protocol. It also removes booting vehicles as recourse, although consolidated government has never exercised that option.
According to the ordinance up for final adoption Tuesday, delinquent fines of $125 or more that have been due for four months or more will first be referred to a collection agency. If the collection agency is unable to collect the fine within an additional 120 days, LCG can exercise the option of pressing for collection in court. (It’s unlikely consolidated government would exercise the court option for people with outstanding fines at the lower end of the threshold as the cost of city-parish attorney fees would exceed the amount collected. Some repeat offenders of the SafeLight/SafeSpeed program, however, owe hundreds and even thousands of dollars.)
There are currently 12 signalled intersections, all within the city limits of Lafayette, equipped with the Redflex cameras. The Durel administration beat back a push to end LCG’s contract with the company — a move that would have shuttered the red-light cameras and speed vans — last spring.
The ordinance was passed unanimously as an introductory item on July 3. To read the ordinance and its associated documentation — all 127 pages — click here.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
AUG 22 Blogger Robert Mann is writing about the so-called Edmonson Amendment in this post, and he's not a fan. If Bobby Jindal really does support a "gold standard" of ethics he would have done something - or even said something - and yet he has not, Mann says.
AUG 22 Crazy Crawfish is blogging about the (interesting) incident of the state Education Department's website being out of commission earlier this week. It was reported (with heavy implications) in two local media outlets, and Crawfish feels the stories would have been better had the reporters done a little investigation instead of just printing what they were told.
AUG 22 Blogger Tom Aswell has some advice for state troopers who plan on making any public comments or challenges to the Jindal administration: don't do it. He's telling the story of one trooper who dared to challenge Commander Mike Edmonson's buddy and paid the price for it.
AUG 22 Columnist Clancy DuBos is writing about the upcoming elections in this post on Gambit. The field for local and federal offices has its share of old guys, he tells us, although mostly he's talking about Edwin Edwards.
AUG 22 Columnist Jim Beam is talking about the Office of Group Benefits in this post; that's the office that handles the money collected from state employees to pay their benefits. The OGB reserve fund has been reduced by half in the last year, and the Jindal administration keeps saying that's a good thing - but that's like telling a kid that castor oil is good, Beam says.
AUG 22 Columnist James Gill is writing about dueling efforts over the killing of animals; on one side is a lady trying to avoid the euthanizing of stray cats and on the other is a camp of folk who feel that there are enough black bears in Louisiana for us to start killing them for fun.
AUG 22 One could assume that nobody (teachers included) likes it when politicians tell them how to do their job. So what do teachers think about Common Core? Blogger Michael Deshotels is examining some responses from teachers who were asked. (Spoiler alert: none of these comments will be used in a Common Core marketing campaign.)
AUG 22 This post on The Hill is commenting upon the latest round of "that candidate is the worst person in the world" ads that are running in Louisiana's Senate race. This round takes aim at Bill Cassidy, the physician/Congressman who is challenging Mary Landrieu, and lists all the votes he has cast that hurt veterans.
AUG 21 Tom Aswell is telling us about another "efficiency" contract the state has signed. This one is paying a consultant (i.e. someone with a briefcase from out of town) $140 an hour, plus tens of thousands in air fare. The agency on the receiving end of this tender care? The DMV. Well -- that's working great, then.
AUG 21 Columnist Stephanie Riegel is writing about the scandal that has rocked the LSU Alumni Association (to wit, the executive director's "girlfriend" also was his employee; when they "broke up" he started paying her, with alumni money, to keep her mouth shut). In particular, she's looking for some lessons to learn from the mishigas.
AUG 21 This post on The Lens brings us up to date on the ongoing process of populating the levee board that will decide if the so-called Big Oil lawsuit will move forward. Gov. Jindal has done his best to put the kibosh on the suit by removing pro-suit members, but the process of replacing them is not simple, Bob Marshall tells us.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly