From our C’est What file this week, the Louisiana Ethics Board is set to give state lawmakers the full-steam-ahead to begin purchasing film tax credits issued by the Louisiana Motion Picture Tax Incentive Act, a mechanism under the umbrella of the state Department of Economic Development designed to lure movie production companies to Louisiana by granting them tax credits to help offset their production costs. The board is also being advised that lawmakers can purchase tax credits issued by the Louisiana Division of Historic Preservation.
The Ethics Board was asked for an advisory opinion on the issue in April by Senate Secretary Glenn Koepp, and during its meeting Friday in Baton Rouge the board will consider staff attorney Tracy Barker’s opinion that indeed nothing in Louisiana law prevents solons from cashing in on the tax credits.
The Louisiana Motion Picture Tax Incentive Act allows movie production companies to receive the tax credits — they must undergo an application process — and further allows the production companies, according to Barker’s report, to “elect to use the tax credits in three ways: (1) sell the tax credits to the State at 85% of face value; (2) claim the credits on it own tax return at 100% face value; or (3) sell the tax credits to a third party.” The historic-preservation tax credits work in similar fashion.
Barker points out in her report that many “out-of-state production companies have no state income tax liability, therefore the companies monetize these tax credits by using various agents to exchange them for cash.” Now that the Ethics Board is clearing the way for state lawmakers to purchase these tax credits, which they can evidently apply to their own individual and/or business income tax burden, may we wonder whether these lawmakers will have easier more expedited access to the “agents” peddling the credits?
Something just seems a bit “off” about the arrangement. But Barker says otherwise, concluding in her analysis (citing previously referenced state law):
Based on the process and procedures as described by OEID and the State Historic Preservation Office, it does not appear there is any transaction between a purchaser of tax credits (transferee/legislator) and the legislature as prohibited by R.S. 42:1113C. Further, no contracts are entered into with any state agency by the transferee/legislator in purchasing tax credits, thus no violation of R.S. 42:1113D is presented.
Also on Friday at the Ethics Board meeting, the board will consider an advisory opinion by staff attorney Brent Durham finding that a receptionist at the Paul & Lulu University Art Museum in Lafayette who won a pair of American Airlines tickets (to anywhere in the continental U.S.) as a door prize at a luncheon sponsored by the Lafayette Convention & Visitors Commission can accept the tickets. Girl, you go.
To read the advisory opinion on the tax credits (with links to associated documents), click here.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 8 - Maybe that wasn't such a good idea, after all. This post on the Louisiana Oil & Gas Association's site says we're looking at oil prices that are tanking because there's so much oil coming out of the Gulf. Some are even predicting a glut. What's likely to be the result? Lower gas prices, higher refinery profits, and more pressure on the feds to loosen export restrictions.
DEC 8 Here's the latest from blogger Robert Mann, and it's on one of his favorite topics: Bobby Jindal. He's taking a look at Jindal's record and his current maneuvering, which of course is a ploy to position him for a run for the White House. "America Next," Jindal's current big idea, is just as vague about what it is proposing as Jindal usually is, Mann says. And it won't protect him from his "unimaginative record," as Mann describes it.
DEC 8 - Don't know what that is? Then run on over to LaPolitics and read this post by Jeremy Alford, which serves as a history lesson about the famed tonic and it's purveyor, Dudley LeBlanc. It's really a fascinating story and Alford's description of Dudley as an "icon of Louisiana politics and culture" is not an exaggeration.
DEC 8 In this editorial, the Picayune again urges Gov. Jindal to take the Medicaid money. But the piece's exhortation that Jindal "be sensible" is a little misplaced, isn't it? Because Jindal's not being stupid -- well, maybe he is -- but he's following orders from people he believes can get him into the White House. This editorial is engaging in the argument that Jindal is publicly making, without acknowledging what his true motivations are. Somebody send these guys a clue.
DEC 8 Columnist Mark Ballard is writing about the impact of Vance McAllister's defeat of Neil Riser in this post. He starts out talking about how McAllister's more reasonable approach was more attractive to voters than was Riser's hard-line (tea-party-ish) rants. Dan Claitor, a state lege from BR who is expected to run for Congress soon, expressed it best when he said voters aren't looking for candidates who are "throwing temper tantrums when they can't get their way."
DEC 8 It's always gratifying when a Louisiana son makes international headlines. And our son, David "former KKK grand poobah" Duke is back in the news, making us all proud. This (UK) Telegraph story, unearthed by the Dead Pelican, tells us that Duke has been expelled from Italy but is trying to return. The Italians say he is trying to "establish a pan-European, extremist neo-Nazi group in northern Italy." Huh. You don't say.
DEC 9 This is a kind of puzzling post from columnist Jim Beam, in which he discusses a recent appearance by former Gov. Edwin Edwards in Lake Charles. He said he's surprised by EWE's "grasp of current events." Did Jim never meet Slick Eddie? He's no dummy, and for Beam to assume he is -- well, given he covered the man for 50 years, that's the surprise.
DEC 9 A "suspicious package" shut down part of Zachary Sunday, WAFB tells us in this post. The package, which eventually was "rendered safe" (bomb squad lingo for blown up) was found in a storage unit that someone quit paying on. Other cop gear was found in the unit, so it is possible the thing was a training tool, police say. But they leave out the best part: who bought it? Barry, Jarrod or Darrell?
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly