From our C’est What file this week, the Louisiana Ethics Board is set to give state lawmakers the full-steam-ahead to begin purchasing film tax credits issued by the Louisiana Motion Picture Tax Incentive Act, a mechanism under the umbrella of the state Department of Economic Development designed to lure movie production companies to Louisiana by granting them tax credits to help offset their production costs. The board is also being advised that lawmakers can purchase tax credits issued by the Louisiana Division of Historic Preservation.
The Ethics Board was asked for an advisory opinion on the issue in April by Senate Secretary Glenn Koepp, and during its meeting Friday in Baton Rouge the board will consider staff attorney Tracy Barker’s opinion that indeed nothing in Louisiana law prevents solons from cashing in on the tax credits.
The Louisiana Motion Picture Tax Incentive Act allows movie production companies to receive the tax credits — they must undergo an application process — and further allows the production companies, according to Barker’s report, to “elect to use the tax credits in three ways: (1) sell the tax credits to the State at 85% of face value; (2) claim the credits on it own tax return at 100% face value; or (3) sell the tax credits to a third party.” The historic-preservation tax credits work in similar fashion.
Barker points out in her report that many “out-of-state production companies have no state income tax liability, therefore the companies monetize these tax credits by using various agents to exchange them for cash.” Now that the Ethics Board is clearing the way for state lawmakers to purchase these tax credits, which they can evidently apply to their own individual and/or business income tax burden, may we wonder whether these lawmakers will have easier more expedited access to the “agents” peddling the credits?
Something just seems a bit “off” about the arrangement. But Barker says otherwise, concluding in her analysis (citing previously referenced state law):
Based on the process and procedures as described by OEID and the State Historic Preservation Office, it does not appear there is any transaction between a purchaser of tax credits (transferee/legislator) and the legislature as prohibited by R.S. 42:1113C. Further, no contracts are entered into with any state agency by the transferee/legislator in purchasing tax credits, thus no violation of R.S. 42:1113D is presented.
Also on Friday at the Ethics Board meeting, the board will consider an advisory opinion by staff attorney Brent Durham finding that a receptionist at the Paul & Lulu University Art Museum in Lafayette who won a pair of American Airlines tickets (to anywhere in the continental U.S.) as a door prize at a luncheon sponsored by the Lafayette Convention & Visitors Commission can accept the tickets. Girl, you go.
To read the advisory opinion on the tax credits (with links to associated documents), click here.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
NOV 28 Bill Cassidy says the story about his possible double-dipping from taxpayers is a "non-issue," the ABC News politics blog reports here. The story, broken by bloggers Lamar White Jr. and Jason Brad Berry earlier this week, is probably an issue for some taxpayers.
NOV 28 Blogger Tom Aswell writes about the next step for the 6th Congressional race. Former Gov. and ex-con Edwin Edwards plans to take some shots at opponent Garret Graves by pointing out that Graves is buddies with Bobby Jindal.
NOV 28 Blogger Ian McGibboney responds to a troll-like poster who had a problem with his most recent post about the Saints. Since people are rioting in Ferguson, Ian shouldn't talk about football, this individual opined. It's possible to care about more than one thing, Ian counters.
NOV 28 Yet again, we're hearing about budget cuts that are necessary because of a big budget hole, this editorial in the American Press says. This raises some questions, the paper says, such as: Why does this keep happening? And how can this be so when we're being told our economy is doing great?
NOV 28 Blogger Jason Brad Berry, arguably the only guy in Louisiana who is truly paying attention to the BP claims process, has a little something to say about a Picayune story on the audit reports. He wants to know if the reporter has ESP, or just wrote her story based on a press release. He also has links to the documents she wrote about - so you can judge for yourself.
NOV 28 The publishers of the Forward Now blog post this disclaimer about their social media accounts. They don't monitor who "likes" their articles, the publishers say, and they aren't trying to manipulate Facebook likes. Say what?
NOV 26 Jim Brown, like many of us Louisiana voters, seems fed up with out of town know-it-alls trying to tell us what to do. Bill Cassidy can't make it through the day without flying someone in to "tell us political retards" how to vote, he says.
NOV 26 Zach Kopplin, who we came to know and love when he was a Louisiana high school student lobbying for the continued inclusion of science stuff in science class, pens this post in The Atlantic about a "textbook" available for social studies instruction in Texas that discusses how Moses contributed to the Constitution. (Oy! Texas rednecks love Jews. Who knew?)
NOV 26 Blogger Tom Aswell is writing about the behavior of the two finalists in the 6th Congressional District race: Edwin Edwards and Garret Graves. Edwards has come out swinging, but Graves' campaign seems bent on snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, Tom says.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly