News -> INDReporter MON, SEP 10 12:13PM by Walter Pierce

Noisemaker: SCOLA Justice Bernette Johnson

Bernette_JohnsonWe’re loath to venture into the racial politics of the battle over Louisiana Supreme Court Justice Bernette Johnson’s bid to become chief justice of the state’s high court. But how must this look to outsiders?

Reuters is reporting that lawyers for Gov. Bobby Jindal are appealing a federal court judge’s ruling that clears the way for Johnson to become chief justice.

BACKGROUND: The Louisiana Constitution’s succession plan for the state supreme court stipulates that the longest-serving associate justice takes the chief justice position when the current chief justice retires or dies. Johnson, the only black member of the court, was appointed to SCOLA in 1994 via a state racial-discrimination settlement with the feds over the high court’s all-white composition. The settlement ensured at least one member of the court would be a minority and it also expanded the court from six to seven seats. Justices serve six-year terms and Johnson’s fellow justices argue her first six years on the court, during which she was serving as an appointed justice as opposed to an elected justice, shouldn’t count toward her tenure. That would give the chief justice reins to Associate Justice Jeffrey Victory.

Retiring Chief Justice Catherine Kimball initially asked her fellow judges to file briefs arguing the issue before outside judges, but Johnson filed suit in federal court and prevailed. In response, the Jindal administration filed an appeal, arguing that the decision over interpreting the Louisiana Constitution should be left to the Louisiana Supreme Court and not to a federal judge — essentially a variation on the “states’ rights” argument, which was blasted by Johnson’s attorney, who suggests there’s a definite racial component to the effort to prevent his client from becoming chief justice: “That’s what the proponents of slavery said during the Civil War. It’s an age-old excuse,” attorney James Williams tells Reuters.

Read more here.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (1)add
...
written by Robert L. Broussard , September 11, 2012 - 05:50 pm
Walter, please permit me a few fact checks. The term of a Louisiana Supreme Court justice is 10 years, not six. The Louisiana Constitution mandates that the Supreme Court has seven justices. This was the case except for a period of time in the 1990's when Justice Johnson's predecessor and the first African-American to sit on the Supreme Court, Revius Ortigue, was appointed by the court. He served as the eighth justice. Johnson succeeded Ortigue by special appointment in 1994. At the time, Johnson was a judge on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal appointed to serve on the Supreme Court with the other seven justices who were elected from Supreme Court districts. The Consent Decree set up this one appointed position until the retirement of Justice Marcus of New Orleans, at which time his district was turned into the minority district from which Johnson was eventually elected. That is the bargain that was struck to provide an unelected seat on the court to a minority and, at the same time, protect Marcus. In the interim, between her appointment and election, during which time she was an appellate court judge on the Fourth Circuit sitting on the Supreme Court, Justice Victory was elected to the Supreme Court. In my view, this is a legal question about the meaning of "tenure" as a justice, and not about race. If Justice Johnson was a white male, the Supreme Court would be dealing with the same issue of whether her tenure as an appellate court judge sitting by appointment counts for tenure as a Supreme Court justice.



You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it