News -> INDReporter FRI, SEP 14 12:36PM by Leslie Turk

Girard Park court battle heats up Monday

Attorney Jimmy Davidson claims to have 77 percent of the covenant cancellations he needs to change the character and integrity of the historic Girard Park community by opening it up to commercial development, but neighbors who are fighting him say 72 percent of the property he needs is actually on their side or has stayed out of the controversy.

At a 9 a.m. court hearing Monday, District Judge John Trahan will hear Davidson’s motion for summary judgment, determining whether any material facts or matters of law are in dispute in the case.

MapHR

Girard Park residents hoping to preserve the residential integrity of their neighborhood
will argue in state district court Monday that attorney Jimmy Davidson has nowhere near the covenant cancellation agreements he needs. Those residents say this exhibit shows that 72 percent
of property owners in the affected area are either against Davidson or have stayed out of the
controversy.

Chief among the issues will be the waivers themselves. “They don’t have everything they say they have in the way of [cancellations],” says attorney Gary McGoffin, who represents the opposing residents (and, full disclosure, is IND Monthly’s legal counsel). Davidson, who owns 4 acres at Girard Park and Hospital drives, has been battling his neighbors in this quaint slice of Lafayette for more than a decade, gathering waivers from them since 1995 in an attempt to have the court declare null and void a 1940 covenant that restricts much of the property along Girard Park drive to single-family dwellings and apartments. He needs cancellation agreements from more than half of the land area affected by the covenant, also known as Act 153556. What should be included in the calculation is all of the property south and west of Girard Park Circle and Girard Park Drive and the portion of that property east of and abutting Girard Park Drive for a depth of 300 feet. The weight of each vote is determined by the square footage of land area within each property owner’s lot.

Girard_Park_coverIn building his case, Davidson uses at least 10 waivers signed by people who no longer own the property encumbered by the covenant, according to McGoffin, who believes Davidson needs new waivers from current land owners. “Simply put, this is an election which requires a majority vote,” McGoffin writes in his opposition to summary judgment. “The voters are the owners of the land on the date of the election.” Under Davidson’s theory, McGoffin argues that these 10 landowners would be disenfranchised from the right to vote on the character of their neighborhood.

Additionally, some of those who signed waivers have revoked them, and for unknown reasons Davidson decided to exclude six lots owned by the Verlanders (across from Davidson’s home and located at the corner of Girard Park Drive and Girard Park Circle) in his computations; the plaintiff is likely to argue that their non-conforming use — they run a bed and breakfast on the property — should exempt them. And then there is the murky matter of the city-owned former planetarium building and Heymann Memorial Park property. Davidson claims that the city’s intervention in his suit was an agreement to waive the covenant restrictions, but no such waiver — which would likely require council approval — has been signed.

The defendants in the case hired engineer/land surveyor Al Reaux to analyze the property; his assessment was based on records from the Lafayette Parish tax assessor's office.

Davidson and his attorney have declined comment on the case.

For more on this issue, read the IND’s February cover story, “Don’t Back Down,” here.



Comments (3)add
...
written by Michael A. Moss , September 14, 2012 - 04:35 pm
Old Lafayette family money! Having to play by the rules! What a wonderful THANG!!! Is this the same fella who had an outlaw plastics plant hid in the bushes? And nothing was done about it? What's da deal wit DAT??
...
written by Jackie Hirshberg , September 15, 2012 - 03:35 pm
It is so sad that today we all went to the Horse Farm to celebrate our newest park at the old "horse farm" and Monday morning those of us who live around Girard Park will be in court trying to keep the original Horse Farm buyer from making the area around the park Commercial. Win one battle but the "Big Boys" will get you another way. The residents of Girard park are paying for this battle from their own funds but are simply being crushed by the bigger money man. I hope everyone enjoyed the Horse Farm today as Girard Park will never be the same after Monday in Judge Trahan's court at 10AM
...
written by Jackie Hirshberg , September 15, 2012 - 03:41 pm
The City of Lafayette is also working with the "old horse farm buyers" turning the Planetarium, Heymann Park and possibly the Heymann Civic center into commercial property to sell to someone (Lafayette General?). How can 7 homeowners fight big government and individuals willing to rape Girard Park. Maybe it doesn't matter. Maybe your kids will be happy with just the Horse farm. I just can't say anymore because everywhere I look rich people are trying to squash regular people. We cannot compete with UL, Laf. General or big shot lawyers. Just remember we tried to help but the donation of the horse farm now overshadows the real fight, the one for Girard Park.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it