Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:09
by Patrick Flanagan
Judge dismisses most allegations in police lawsuit
A federal court judge cleared all but three of the 13 defendants named in a lawsuit filed earlier this year by a group of former and current Lafayette police officers against high-ranking officials from within the PD and Lafayette Consolidated Government.
During a hearing Wednesday, federal Magistrate Judge Patrick Hanna dismissed all the allegations included in the suit, except those pertaining to First Amendment Rights violations. The defendants cleared Wednesday by Hanna include LCG, the Lafayette Police Department, City-Parish President Joey Durel, LCG Human Resources Manager Ray Domingue, and police officers Ted Vincent, Randy Vincent, Levy Firmin, Dwayne Prejean, U.J. Prevost and Keith Gremillion. Those who remain in the suit are Chief Jim Craft, Chief Administrative Officer Dee Stanley and Maj. Jackie Alfred.
Hanna’s ruling concludes:
[T]he plaintiffs’ claims are reduced to ... two alleged policymakers, and one supervisor for the alleged violation of their First Amendment free speech rights, seeking compensation for the adverse employment actions that allegedly occurred as a result of those violations.”
Those two policy makers are Chief of Police Jim Craft and LCG Chief Administrative Officer Dee Stanley. They are joined by officer Jackie Alfred, a supervisor within the department, as the last defendants with allegations still lingering after Wednesday’s ruling.
What remains for Craft, Stanley and Alfred is the allegation that they violated the First Amendment rights of six defendants through an unspoken policy called the “Code of Silence.”
According to the lawsuit:
[I]n order to maintain control ... the Stanley-Craft Organization perpetuat[ed] a permanent hostile work environment [through] bogus internal complaint and bogus internal affairs investigations. [F]ailure to honor this so-called ‘code’ is punished with severe employment-based retaliation.
Lafayette attorney Michael Corry represents LCG and the department but declined comment due to judge Hanna’s standing gag order.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
AUG 22 Blogger Robert Mann is writing about the so-called Edmonson Amendment in this post, and he's not a fan. If Bobby Jindal really does support a "gold standard" of ethics he would have done something - or even said something - and yet he has not, Mann says.
AUG 22 Crazy Crawfish is blogging about the (interesting) incident of the state Education Department's website being out of commission earlier this week. It was reported (with heavy implications) in two local media outlets, and Crawfish feels the stories would have been better had the reporters done a little investigation instead of just printing what they were told.
AUG 22 Blogger Tom Aswell has some advice for state troopers who plan on making any public comments or challenges to the Jindal administration: don't do it. He's telling the story of one trooper who dared to challenge Commander Mike Edmonson's buddy and paid the price for it.
AUG 22 Columnist Clancy DuBos is writing about the upcoming elections in this post on Gambit. The field for local and federal offices has its share of old guys, he tells us, although mostly he's talking about Edwin Edwards.
AUG 22 Columnist Jim Beam is talking about the Office of Group Benefits in this post; that's the office that handles the money collected from state employees to pay their benefits. The OGB reserve fund has been reduced by half in the last year, and the Jindal administration keeps saying that's a good thing - but that's like telling a kid that castor oil is good, Beam says.
AUG 22 Columnist James Gill is writing about dueling efforts over the killing of animals; on one side is a lady trying to avoid the euthanizing of stray cats and on the other is a camp of folk who feel that there are enough black bears in Louisiana for us to start killing them for fun.
AUG 22 One could assume that nobody (teachers included) likes it when politicians tell them how to do their job. So what do teachers think about Common Core? Blogger Michael Deshotels is examining some responses from teachers who were asked. (Spoiler alert: none of these comments will be used in a Common Core marketing campaign.)
AUG 22 This post on The Hill is commenting upon the latest round of "that candidate is the worst person in the world" ads that are running in Louisiana's Senate race. This round takes aim at Bill Cassidy, the physician/Congressman who is challenging Mary Landrieu, and lists all the votes he has cast that hurt veterans.
AUG 21 Tom Aswell is telling us about another "efficiency" contract the state has signed. This one is paying a consultant (i.e. someone with a briefcase from out of town) $140 an hour, plus tens of thousands in air fare. The agency on the receiving end of this tender care? The DMV. Well -- that's working great, then.
AUG 21 Columnist Stephanie Riegel is writing about the scandal that has rocked the LSU Alumni Association (to wit, the executive director's "girlfriend" also was his employee; when they "broke up" he started paying her, with alumni money, to keep her mouth shut). In particular, she's looking for some lessons to learn from the mishigas.
AUG 21 This post on The Lens brings us up to date on the ongoing process of populating the levee board that will decide if the so-called Big Oil lawsuit will move forward. Gov. Jindal has done his best to put the kibosh on the suit by removing pro-suit members, but the process of replacing them is not simple, Bob Marshall tells us.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly