News -> INDReporter MON, DEC 3 11:59AM by IND Monthly Staff

The high cost of higher ed cuts

Since April, two system presidents and three campus leaders have either retired, been dismissed or announced they would retire from Louisiana’s higher education system, The Advocate notes in a Monday story analyzing the long-term effects of the Jindal administration’s decision to cut $425 million from higher ed budgets since 2008.

Those cuts have also led research faculty to look elsewhere — taking with them the millions in research grants. Now department heads, deans, faculty — and yes, even students — are checking out of the state. What’s more, some universities’ accreditation may be at risk, not to mention the blows being dealt to quality education.

Other universities see the state as fertile recruting ground, according to the story:

Former LSU Chancellor Michael Martin said Louisiana’s dire budget outlook led other schools to target him in the months before August when he left the Baton Rouge campus to lead the Colorado State University system.

On Friday, Martin said he’s heard from several people at LSU who have asked him to be a reference as they look for new jobs.
“There’s always going to be people leaving, but what we’re seeing at LSU is people making lots of lateral moves,” Martin said. “The image of Louisiana among higher ed folks is of a state still struggling. It makes Louisiana vulnerable. I hope people choose to stay because LSU really is a fine institution.”

Louisiana’s solution to balancing the state budget has just been cut, cut, cut higher ed, while other states have found more creative ways to keep higher education adequately funded, the story points out.

Barry Erwin, head of the Council for A Better Louisiana, which lobbies on public policy, told the newspaper Louisiana has a good example of how to protect higher education next door in Texas.

Read the story here.



Comments (4)add
...
written by Michael A. Moss , December 03, 2012 - 10:26 am
Thank God for Oil!
...
written by Greg Foreman , December 04, 2012 - 07:16 am
"THANK GOD FOR OIL"? What good is oil when the state doesn't tax its production? Louisiana continues to loss $500+ million a year because Jindal and his "lap dogs" refuse to tax oil/gas production produced from horizontally drilled wells. The only tax benefit Louisiana derives from oil is the sales taxes accessed on gasoline and diesel,20 cents state tax per gallon, and this rate has not changed in over 20 years. Other than that, Louisiana does not benefit from the bulk of oil/gas production within Louisiana because the bulk of such production is from horizontally drilled wells. Such production was granted and exemption from severance taxes under a 1994 law passed under the FOSTER administration. When Jindal had the opportunity to amend, modify or even repeal this statue, he "caved in" to his financial supporters and refused to back those legislators calling for it's repeal or modification. As such, Louisiana looses in excess of $500 million dollars annually. While the states hospitals, schools, state employees suffer from layoffs, Jindal travels the countryside extolling the virtue of his "I'm cheaper than you plan". Alas, we can only pray, where is Edwin when we need him.

...
written by Michael A. Moss , December 05, 2012 - 12:54 am
Greg: It's because most folks don't need a college degree to work in the oil industry. Just think how many folks would be in the soup line if not for oil. That is what I mean by "Thank God for Oil."
Do you remeber the Oil Bust? Well, I do!
And guess what, with all of the cuts, not one higher up (at the colleges) got layed off or took a pay cut! WHATS UP WIT DAT?
...
written by Michael A. Moss , December 05, 2012 - 01:28 pm
remember
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it