News -> INDReporter FRI, DEC 14 12:18PM by Walter Pierce

Did aliens abduct Bobby Jindal...

It’s the first explanation that pops to mind: Someone has kidnapped our governor, who has publicly said he thinks it’s OK to teach Intelligent Design (creationism in a lab coat) alongside evolution in biology class, and replaced him with a politician actually attuned to the fact-based reality the GOP has been slowly and painfully seceding from for two decades.

Yahoo! News’ Liz Goodwin brought to our attention Jindal’s op-ed today in the Wall Street Journal, “The End of Birth-Control Politics,” in which he announces his support for selling oral contraceptives over the counter without a prescription. Again, Gov. Bobby Jindal says he supports selling oral contraceptives over the counter without a prescription. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, after all, threw its support behind same last month.

But after reading Goodwin’s report — you can’t read Jindal’s actual piece unless you’re a WSJ subscriber — we see that Jindal’s reasonableness is motivated more by political maneuvering than rational thought:  “I agree with this opinion, which if embraced by the federal government would take contraception out of the political arena,” he writes. “Democrats have wrongly accused Republicans of being against birth control and against allowing people to use it. That’s hogwash,” Jindal writes. “But Republicans do want to protect those who have religious beliefs that are opposed to contraception.”

So it’s really more about countering the Dems’ charge that the GOP has been waging a “war on women,” which was used so effectively against Republicans in the last election cycle, than it is about sound public health policy. But hey, baby steps...


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (1)add
...
written by Greg Foreman , December 17, 2012 - 09:24 am
"We see that Jindal’s reasonableness is motivated more by political maneuvering than rational thought"-what else is new? "BJ" hasn't had a creative thought in his entire term as governor. He has been/is more concerned with pandering to the "feel good" elements of society than stating/bearing the facts of fiscal existence and promulgating revenue generating programs dedicated to keeping the state afloat. It is easier to cut the throat of those needing services, those providing education, medical services and protection than to pass legislation aimed at revenue generation to maintain such services.
So, I ask once again, what else is new?
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it