News -> INDReporter WED, JAN 16 9:25AM by Melinda Deslatte, Associated Press

Jindal tax plan would keep incentive programs

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — The leader on Gov. Bobby Jindal's proposed tax code rewrite said Tuesday the administration wants to keep most of the state's economic development incentive programs as part of the revamp.

Many of the programs overseen by the Department of Economic Development give credits or exemptions to income taxes, so they would need to be modified since Jindal is proposing to eliminate state income taxes in exchange for higher sales taxes.

"We'll either have to turn them into an outright incentive, or we'll have to look at it as offset against another tax type," said Tim Barfield, executive counsel at the Department of Revenue.

Incentive programs promote areas like research and development, digital media, film productions and facility modernization, for example. The tax exemption programs overseen by the economic development department totaled about $364 million in 2011, according to Jindal administration data.

"To the extent that the Legislature and the administration made a conscious decision to promote economic development, we want to keep those programs," Barfield told the annual meeting of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry.

He outlined basic concepts Jindal will propose to lawmakers in the upcoming legislative session that begins in April.

The governor said he wants the tax code rewrite to be "revenue neutral," so that it would not generate additional tax dollars or siphon more money from state coffers.

That means maintaining the economic development incentive programs as either direct payments or a new type of tax break adds another cost to be offset, on top of the nearly $3 billion that would be lost by eliminating personal income taxes and corporate franchise and income taxes, as Jindal proposes.

How the pieces would work together and how much sales taxes would have to be raised are still being worked out, Barfield said. But the general outline, he said, is to eliminate other tax exemptions to save the state money, while also raising sales taxes.

After his speech, Barfield said property tax changes aren't currently being considered, and no discussions have been had about doing away with state severance taxes on oil and gas.

He told the LABI audience of business leaders and lawmakers that the state's structure of 468 tax exemptions, credits and exclusions make the tax code too complicated and make the cost of doing business in Louisiana seem higher than it is.

He pitched the state sales tax, which is currently 4 percent, as a more stable and predictable revenue stream than income tax that grows with the economy.

Initial concerns have been raised that the tax swap would raise taxes on low- to moderate-income families and give upper-income earners a tax break, because the sales tax hits everyone at the same rate while income tax rates are higher for people who are paid more. Some low-income workers don't earn enough to have to pay income taxes at all.

Barfield said the administration is considering ways, like a possible tax rebate, to help the poor shrink some of the increased costs of the sales tax hike.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (1)add
...
written by Greg Foreman , January 16, 2013 - 04:16 pm
Of course Jindal wants to insure the “business incentives” granted will remain in tact. He has done an “excellent” job of “insentivetizing” corporate life in Louisiana-all at the expense of the working taxpayers. After all, corporate income taxes for 2011 were/are $500 million dollars less than corporate income taxes collected for 2008. (PG 35, 2012 LA DEPT OF REV REPT 2006/2011). Under Jindal's first term, corporate income taxes dropped 73.50%--like WOW. Louisiana's individual income tax collections for the same period dropped a poultry 26.37%(which is somewhat ironic when one takes into consideration the great economic leaps claimed by Jindal and the Jindanistas. Under such “expansive” economic growth, a perpetual claim of Jindal, one would assume individual income taxes collections would have stabilized or increased, but collections have not-but forgive me, I digress). Returning to the original subject matter: Jindal's approach from day one of his administration has been to balance the economic woes—woes largely created by his ineffective leadership-on the back of the average/middle class/wage earner of the state and to give corporations “free ride”. One is sure to find supporters of such a plan, especially among prominent business leaders and corporations doing business in Louisiana, i.e. , the financial base of Jindal's political ambitions. If anyone thinks such a program will be remotely successful, we only have to examine the long running economic crises among European countries.

European countries have some of the lowest corporate income taxes in the world—much lower than the US. However, such “competitive taxes” have not produced the revenue necessary to maintain these countries existence. Granted, it can/will be coincided the European economic crises is a complex condition, that many factors contributed to and continue to contribute to the economic malaise in Europe-a treatise far to deep and complicated for presentation here. However, the main point one can glean from such an approach is that lower corporate taxation does not produce the corresponding increase in individual income taxes necessary to maintain government expenses.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it