News -> INDReporter FRI, FEB 22 11:09AM by Melinda Deslatte, Associated Press

Jindal's $24.7B budget proposal unveiled

[Editor's Note: Below is a longer version of the story posted earlier Friday. Louisiana Budget Project Executive Director Jan Moller released the following statement concerning the proposed budget: 

"This is an unbalanced budget that kills jobs and continues to erode Louisiana's investments in health care and education while asking more of college students and families struggling to get to the middle class. It is especially devastating to those who rely on Louisiana's unique health-care safety net, which would be largely dismantled and privatized with no guarantee that vital services would be preserved.

 This disappointing budget would have been better had Gov. Jindal followed the lead of Rick Scott in Florida and other governors who acted in their states’ best interests by accepting new federal support for expanded Medicaid coverage.”

 This budget also does not account for the administration’s plan to cut taxes for the well off by shifting more of the responsibility onto middle-class and low-income Louisianans."

For a full LBP analysis of Gov. Jindal's budget, click here.]

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Gov. Bobby Jindal's $24.7 billion budget proposal for next year pours hundreds of millions in patchwork funding into public colleges and assumes hefty savings from the privatization of LSU hospitals to make the numbers work.

The governor's spending plan for the 2013-14 fiscal year was unveiled to lawmakers Friday by Commissioner of Administration Kristy Nichols, who described it as a challenge to close a more than $1 billion gap.

"We made every effort we can to be smart about the way we deliver services in government," Nichols told the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget.

Jindal's budget assumes millions of dollars in property sales, savings from legislation that hasn't passed and the management turnover of most LSU public hospitals to private facilities to stay in balance.

Lawmakers, weary of five years of budget deficits, questioned those assumptions and pressed for more details about the uncertain financing.

"What if the property sales don't happen or any of those types of contingencies? Are we going to be faced with another midyear budget cut?" asked House Speaker Chuck Kleckley, R-Lake Charles.

Sen. Francis Thompson worried about the loss of health care services in his region because the governor's budget assumes that the LSU hospital in Monroe will be taken over by a private hospital and state funding is stripped for most of the year.

No plan is in place with a so-called "private partner" for the Monroe hospital, however.

"We're not even saying who that somebody is. I've got to have more than that," said Thompson, D-Delhi.

Nichols replied, "We have not put anything in the budget that isn't expected to fully materialize."

"That's not good enough to me," Thompson said. He added, "I'm concerned. The people of this state should be concerned. That's not the way you plan a budget, in my opinion."

Nichols pledged that the services offered at the university health care facilities will continue.

The governor's spending plans assume at least $781 million in savings from the privatization of eight of the 10 university-run public hospitals, even though the contracts aren't final and some deals haven't even been announced.

For the public colleges, Jindal relies on $424 million in one-time sources of money, such as property sales and bond refinancing, and $75 million in tuition increases to keep Louisiana's colleges funded at their current level.

Jindal's budget includes minimal cuts to the health department and would keep spending rates flat for public schools. It would cut more than 10,000 government jobs — 7,300 of those for the LSU hospital workers who would be laid off and required to reapply for their positions with the private managers.

Release of the proposal kicks off the start of legislative budget negotiations. House budget committee hearings are set to open March 12.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (1)add
...
written by Greg Foreman , February 23, 2013 - 02:48 pm
Am I reading this part correctly? “The governor’s proposed budget includes $7.9 billion in state general fund revenue and $9.7 billion in federal dollars.”(Pp 7/LL1). The total budget amounts to $24.7 billion dollars, of which, $9.7 billion will come from the US government. Now whose talking entitlements? And, isn't this somewhat hypocritical on “Bobby-tye's” part? He has consistently maintained he doesn't want any part of “Obama Care”, costing the state to 100% of federal funding for medicaid. Yet, produces a budget relying almost 40%($9.70 B/24.70B=39.27%) on federal revenue to “balance” it? What a fake, a demagogue, a panderer to the base elements of society. The fact is “Bobby-tye's' and his “Jindanista's” are literally “counting their chickens before they hatch”. This proposed budget is dependent on “futures”. It depends on selling this property or signing that contract or hoping something adverse, such as a major hurricane, doesn't occur. The most pathetic part of this entire story is Louisiana has the money to run the state without cutting one employee, without closing one hospital, without any tuition increases, without cutting services to the public school systems, the needy citizens of the state, or the sick and infirmed. Or should I say the state “had” the monies until “Bobby-tye” gave the money away in “so called” business incentives. This is evidenced by the fact that 2011 collection of corporate franchise fees and corporate taxes were $771 million lower than collections for 2008. Now and for the foreseeable future, Louisiana will suffer revenue shortfalls because of Jindal's lack of fiscal understanding, underpinned by a philosophical belief that what is good for business is better for Louisiana. Bottom line is, it don't work that way. If you need a reminder, just look at Europe. Many of these countries have “pander” to major corporations. Countries such as Ireland, Italy, Sweden, etc, have either dropped corporate taxation all together or have instituted corporate incentives to the point that revenue from corporations is virtually nonexistent. Bobby, it hasn't worked for them and it will not work for Louisiana.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it