After several local business owners and the president of the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce voiced their opposition, an introductory ordinance that would have repealed the 2 percent rebate offered to merchants for collecting and remitting sales taxes in the city and unincorporated parish was defeated on a 4-4 vote. The vote cut along party lines, with the Republican councilman voting against the repeal and the Democrats voting in favor. (Councilman Don Bertrand of District 7, a Republican, was absent from Tuesday’s meeting.)
Since the early 1960s when the city first began levying a sales tax — the parish began levying a sales tax in 1972 — merchants were given a 2 percent rebate in taxes collected as an incentive to turn the taxes over to government in a timely fashion. But the overwhelming sentiment of the business owners who addressed the council was that the rebate is not an incentive — it’s reimbursement for doing a job for local government. Most indicated that the 2 percent rebate doesn’t cover the cost of collection.
“Now, I don’t know how to look at this differently, but we don’t ask the employees of our own government to pay for their expenses out of their own pocket to do the work for government, and yet you’re asking people who are forced by law to collect the tax — by taking away this compensation — to pay the expense of doing a job for you, yet in no way compensating them, and that doesn’t make sense — there’s no fairness to that,” said Lafayette business owner Jay Smith.
Other local merchants estimated that it takes up to 30 staff hours per month to perform the tax-collecting function for government.
The ordinance was originally before the council in February, but it was tabled amid opposition from business owners and concerns from the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce. It was on the agenda again two weeks ago but was tabled again due to the unexpected death of Councilman Kevin Naquin’s grandfather. (Naquin was a co-sponsor along with Jay Castille of the ordinance.) Typically introductory ordinances are voted on in batches — and considered individually two weeks later when they come before the council as final ordinances — and seldom receive individual discussion and public comment. But the controversial nature of the Castille/Naquin rebate repeal led to it being pulled aside and voted on separately from the rest of the intro ordinances.
A repeal of the rebate would have brought in roughly $1.5 million for both the city and the parish, which operate on separate budget
To watch a streaming video of last night’s council meeting, click here.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 10 The state's tax amnesty program paid off in a big way, with more money collected than expected, Jeremy Alford writes in LaPolitics. There are laws that govern how that money is supposed to be spent -- but surely the leges will find a way around that, Alford predicts. After all, it has happened before: if there's one thing we're good at, it's robbing Peter to pay Paul.
DEC 10 Tom Aswell continues his coverage of the New Bethany Home for Girls in this post. Although the school shut down years ago, the story has been revived -- especially after several former residents returned to Arcadia last week to file sexual assault complaints against the man who ran the school. Only two of the women filed complaints; the others came (from other states) to lend support. It's a compelling story Tom tells here.
DEC 10 Blogger CB Forgotston isn't buying what the legislature's selling (to itself) regarding Louisiana's fiscal outlook. Leges are telling everybody they don't need to worry about mid-year budget cuts. The Legislative Fiscal Office's predictions aren't being questioned like they should -- except by reporters, CB says.
DEC 10 The Picayune's Jarvis DeBerry writes about Nelson Mandela in this post. The former President of South Africa, who died last week, was not the simple, sanitized "cuddly" guy being portrayed in the simple-minded, easily-distracted American pop media, he says. He's hoping that Mandela's legacy will not receive the same "whitewash" that has been perpetrated against MLK.
DEC 10 Sen. David Vitter's continued efforts to force a vote on lawmakers' health care doesn't pass the "moral high ground test," columnist Stephanie Grace writes in this post. There's no "real policy argument" here and the vote he's trying to force (in true Vitter style, by embarrassing his colleagues) will accomplish "almost nothing" except hurting people, she says. So if he runs for guv and wins, we can look forward to more pointless, empty political posturing? Great.
DEC 10 So who is behind David Vitter's SuperPAC? Blogger Bucktown Pirate takes a look in this post on the Kingfish. With "the internets" and "a modicum of free time," Pirate has done some digging and it's pretty interesting stuff. So why should citizens have to do this much digging to find out who is behind organizations that raise tons of money then spent to influence elections? Good question.
DEC 10 Bob Marley's children and widow have sued Raising Cane's for use of the words "One Love," this blog post on Spin says. The words were registered by the chicken chain years ago, but the family says they're owed damages, attorney fees and all profits attributed to the use because it also was the name of a song recorded by Bob Marley with the Wailers.
DEC 10 Here's Gambit's take on Gov. Jindal's refusal (so far) to take the Medicaid expansion money. He's done this before, the editorial post says: posture and pose for the cameras, then show up in a dark alley to take the money anyway. That time, he handed out the money using big goofy checks with his name as the payer, the post reminds us. So he's not "entirely allergic" to federal bucks after all, the post says.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly