The City-Parish Council will again vote on an introductory ordinance Tuesday that if approved would establish another charter commission to study the Lafayette Home Rule Charter and make recommendations for amending the constitution for Lafayette Consolidated Government.
A similar ordinance failed three weeks ago on a 5-4 vote, with four of the five councilmen who represent a majority of city of Lafayette residents voting in favor and the four councilmen who represent rural and small-town Lafayette Parish voting against. The swing vote last time was District 6 Councilman Andy Naquin, the only member of the council whose constituency is entirely city of Lafayette residents. Naquin joined the majority in killing the ordinance.
District 7 Councilman Don Bertrand, a south Lafayette Republican and one of four sponsors of the ordinance, has vowed to keep putting the ordinance before the council until one of the five holdouts votes in favor. The ordinance enjoys bipartisan support on the council with Democrats Brandon Shelvin and Kenneth Broussard joining Republicans Bertrand and Keith Patin in sponsoring the measure.
Supporters of empaneling a charter commission hope, if given clearance by the council, to effectively reconvene the nine-member commission that studied the charter in 2011. That panel ultimately recommended repealing “consolidated” government, a recommendation that was rejected by voters that fall. Those supporters, including several members of the former commission, now favor adopting what was once called the Hefner Plan, after demographer Mike Hefner, who favors maintaining Lafayette Consolidated Government but redrawing council districts so that five will be entirely within the city of Lafayette and four representing the unincorporated parish and small towns. Such a redistricting would create a five-member Lafayette city council within the larger City-Parish Council, ensuring the city of Lafayette’s autonomy in matters that pertain only to the city (as opposed to our current way of doing things: allowing council members who are not city residents to vote on city-only ordinances and resolutions).
The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. in council auditorium at City Hall.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 20 The Robertson family is playing hardball in their dispute with A&E, the network that airs the wildly profitable "reality" show about their family, Duck Dynasty. Patriarch Phil Robertson was suspended by the network after GQ printed an interview with him that contained his (unedited) comments about gay and black folks. Here's a link to their statement, in which they say they can't imagine the show without papa and announcing that they are in negotiations with A&E about the future of the show.
DEC 20 Blogger Robert Mann (also a journalism prof at LSU and thus an authority on the First Amendment) says something in this post of which a lot of Fox News anchors and internet trolls should take heed: the Constitution says you have freedom of speech. It does not say you can't face consequences for what you say. He also takes a look at what our governor has to say -- and ole Bobby had to drag Miley Cyrus into it.
DEC 20 Blogger Tom Aswell says Governor Bobby Jindal has now had more to say about the comments a "reality" star made about gay and black people than he has had to say about the problems in his own voucher program or the sinkhole in Bayou Corne. In fact, Tom points out, Bobby's all over the Phil Robertson "issue" like "a duck on a June bug."
DEC 20 Here's an interesting post from blogger Katie East in DIG Magazine about celebrity passings. She understands why so many would be sad because of Mandela's passing -- he was an international figure, a political figure, an activist. But there is similar wailing following the passing of people who may not have had the same impact, she says -- like the guy who starred in the Fast and Furious movies. She wants to know: why is that?
DEC 20 Columnist James Gill writes about Louisiana's embattled voucher program in this post. Just because a child attends a private school does not mean he's going to get a good education, Gill writes. Gov. Jindal likes to say the program helps kids get a great education, but whether it does that is open to "considerable doubt," Gill writes.
DEC 20 Gambit's Clancy DuBos writes about the NOLA mayor's race in this post. For a while, it was assumed that it would be a quiet one, given the amount of money Mitch has in the bank. But at the last minute, a (possibly) formidable candidate threw his hat in the ring. The question is, Clancy says, why?
DEC 20 In Louisiana's education system, the state takes over a school that is designated as "failing." The assumption is, that's a good thing and will produce improvement. But is that the case? Blogger Mike Deshotels takes a look at how takeovers perform in one area of testing, the ACT.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly