A long-running squabble between Lafayette and Vermilion parishes could get new life beginning Tuesday when the Lafayette City-Parish Council votes on rejecting a 2003 State Land Office survey that was supposed to finally establish the border between the two parishes. The rejection is virtually a fait accompli: seven of the nine member of the council are co-authors of the ordinance.
What's on the line (!) is about 600 acres (less important) that, according to the State Land office, are in Vermilion Parish. Also at stake are the current and future tax revenues (bingo!) that go along with it. The acreage is a mix of undeveloped agricultural land and residences. Those residents pay property taxes to Vermilion Parish. Lafayette Parish wants their money.
Lafayette and Vermilion parishes were separated by legislative act in 1884, but the border has long been in dispute.
Lafayette Councilman Don Bertrand is one of the co-authors of the ordinance rejecting the State Land Office’s parish line. He argues that Lafayette can prove the line is incorrect based on surveys by the same office that predate the 1844 legislative act establishing the parish lines. That’s when Vermilion and Lafayette became separate parishes.
“This evidence has never been allowed to be produced — either in court or in front of the council or in front of the public,” Bertrand says. “And my question is why are willing to give away property in the smallest parish in Louisiana if we can show it should be according to the legislative act of 1844?”
Good question, especially when tax revenue is involved. But Bertrand says it’s about more than just who’s paying what to whom right now. “It’s not just what’s there today; it’s what’s there down the road,” the south Lafayette Republican says. “It would affect where people pay their taxes. It would affect where kids go to school — where federal dollars go to schools; what roads and infrastructure fall underneath the jurisdiction of what parish.”
The dispute probably wouldn’t be dispute at all but for some late 20th century political jockeying — 1999 to be exact — when then-Lafayette Councilman Lenwood Broussard challenged opponent Linda Duhon’s candidacy. Duhon had been voting and paying taxes in Lafayette Parish for years, but a district court judge ruled that, in fact, she had been living in Vermilion Parish the whole time. The ruling disqualified Duhon for the Lafayette election. It also galvanized Duhon who theretofore had (for all intents and purposes) been a Lafayette Parish resident to file a federal lawsuit challenging the location of the border. That suit against the State Land Office is still pending.
The ordinance, assuming it passes introduction Tuesday night, will go before the council for a final vote two weeks later. Bertrand says he hopes Lafayette and Vermilion can amicably settle on a proper border after that, although there’s little evidence the Vermilion Parish Police Jury would agree to cede land — and the current and future tax revenue that go along with it — to Lafayette. Ultimately this dispute might wind up in court.
“I believe we can show the best evidence of the 1844 boundary on the west side and that by agreement we can resolve this with Vermilion to where that line is,” Bertrand says. “And then we research the eastern side using the same forensic surveying technique and we set the east side as well, based on the best evidence, not by arbitrary decision. And we move on.”
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
OCT 31 The National Journal posts another story from its visit to NOLA, this one about the struggling Vietnamese shrimpers in the area. The publication has been looking at how the state is recovering from Katrina, nine years later.
OCT 31 The New York Times posts this look at Louisiana politics, and how national issues are forcing out the old-time local politicking. Of course they mention EWE, aptly described as an old-time politician known for "charming one half of the state and mortifying the other."
OCT 31 Here's an AP story on the ABC site about Louisiana's chicken little response to an international medical conference planned in NOLA this weekend. Organizers (who are actual physicians, as opposed to the hand-wringing state officials who issued the edicts) say the orders are "unfortunate" given that a main focus of the meeting was Ebola.
OCT 31 Given the things Bobby Jindal has said and done since he's been governor, it's a pretty safe bet he thinks we're a bunch of dummies. Apparently, he's sure President Obama is one, too. This story on Huff Post quotes Jindal as saying the president - a graduate of Harvard Law - should sue to get his money back. (What should a Brown biology grad who doesn't believe in evolution do?)
OCT 31 Us old folks are used to a two-party system, although most of us aren't sold on its success. But what if that system wasn't in place; what if politics reflected the true level of diversity among voters? That's what an LSU student is dreaming of in this editorial. He sees the two parties' control of our politics as limiting.
OCT 31 And you thought the Senate race was dirty. This post on the Forward Now blog tells the story of a Shreveport mayoral campaign worker who was paid to "infiltrate" and "sabotage" an opponent's campaign. Karma's a beeotch, though, because turns out the guy really liked the "enemy," and now he's supporting her. For real.
OCT 30 The National Journal offers this analysis of Bobby Jindal's willingness to stump in any Senate campaign that's not in Louisiana. Why is that? The Journal asks some GOPers and finds that the answer is one we already know: he's so unpopular here, because he's been so busy running for President, that his support might be "toxic."
OCT 30 Blogger Tom Aswell is still all over the OGB mess - and all by himself, apparently. In this post, he's revealing orders from the Jindal administration to destroy records from the state employee health insurance plan. Those orders (he's heard) have angered the Secretary of State and caused an administration lawyer to quit her job. Wow!
OCT 30 A NOLA lady has alleged she was drugged and raped at a Bywater club that had a clothing-optional policy until recently, and she's now become the victim of a smear campaign, columnist Jarvis DeBerry writes in this post. She chose to reveal her story and her name, and she's being punished for that now, he says.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly