Lafayette Parish School Board member Hunter Beasley's plan to call a closed-door executive session to discuss the unpaid invoice submitted by the private contractor hired to oversee the selection of the district’s third-party group health plan administrator may not be legal.

RMay 130306 7278 Beasley  
Photo by Robin May  
LPSB's Hunter Beasley  

Beasley, according to a report Wednesday by the Acadiana Advocate, originally intended for the executive session to be held during tonight’s meeting, but pulled the item after it was accidentally listed on the agenda as an executive committee discussion, which would not be private.

Beasley tells the Advocate his intention was to discuss the matter privately behind closed doors, so he pulled the item with plans to call the executive session at the board's next meeting in February.

At issue is the $200,000 bill submitted by Rina Tikia of Tikia Consulting Group out of Metairie, which has yet to be paid by the school system after her questionable handling of last year’s selection of a health plan administrator — a process the board ultimately scrapped after a growing number of employees, past and present, came out in protest. Read more about that here.

brokeroftheyear2012  
 Rina Tikia  

Following the troubles surrounding the board’s 2012 selection of a health plan administrator — the last two selection processes have proven problematic — Beasley took it upon himself to find a consultant to handle the process in 2013, ultimately selecting Tikia’s firm in June 2013. One major problem with Beasley’s selection is that a contract was never signed determining how much she would be paid for her services, which is why it now seems he’s hoping to discuss the matter in private.

According to the requirements for calling an executive session, says an IND source familiar with school system legal matters, Beasley’s request for an executive session won't pass legal muster.

An executive session is allowable by law when it’s called to discuss personnel matters such as professional competence, personal character or health (both physical and mental). Pending litigation is also an acceptable reason for public bodies going behind closed doors, but that requires the reception of a formal written letter of demand.

Tikia is not an employee of the school system, and so far, no letter of demand has been submitted to the school board. So if Beasley wants to discuss Tikia’s invoice legally, he’ll need to do so in an open meeting, where everyone will hear why Tikia was hired without a contract and understanding of what she'd be paid — and they'll certainly better understand Beasley's head-scratching role in this mess.

Comments   

+2 #2 GREGORY FOREMAN 2014-01-15 18:05
After all, Ms. Tikia didn't just wake up one morning and decide to perform the task or expend her efforts in this regard because she thought it was a “good idea”. Ms. Tikia's efforts were influenced and directed by the “promise” of a contract from a member of the school board, one Hunter Beasley. The fact that a contract was never signed, sealed or delivered would be-in a jurist sense-secondary to the efforts Ms. Tikia expended. Now, I'm certain that a purchase of a good or service over a given amount, a given level of expenditure would demand review, examination and approval of the LPSB.
The fact that such was not and has not been done is most regrettable. However, this situation is symptomatic, and a perfect example of one of the problems facing education in Lafayette parish. In the simplest, most elementary sense of the word, the LPSB suffers from “to many Chiefs and not enough Indians.”
+2 #1 GREGORY FOREMAN 2014-01-15 18:04
QUESTION? What type of business agrees to do work without a signed written contract? Answer, a stupid one. What authority did Hunter Beasley have to consider any company for any purpose? Such an action on Beasley's part is both reckless and unwarranted. Bottom line, many may take the attitude, no contract, no pay, Ms. Tikia is out in the cold. However, if this situation evolves into legal “fisticuffs”, Ms. Tikia will be awarded a “certain” amount of money. She would be required to produce documents verifying and justifying whatever charges she seeks collecting. The fact that a “legal” contract was never established between Ms. Tikia and the LPSB would be taken into consideration. Defense council, the LPSB, would rest heavily on that fact. Unfortunately, a greater fact would prevail, the existence of a verbal contract.

To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.

feed-image RSS Feed
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Advertisement
Advertisement