This week in clutter: Council set to bend on political signs
[Update: The introductory ordinance was approved by the council Tuesday night; it will be voted on for final adoption on July 15.]
Ceding to the political class’ First Amendment right to diminish Lafayette’s already compromised aesthetic appeal — we’re thinking of you Johnston Street — the City-Parish Council is set to vote tonight (Tuesday) on watering down the section of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance pertaining to political signs. If approved, the change would likely lead to a proliferation of temporary candidate/issue signs that already clutter our fair city.
Photo by Robin May
Currently, the CZO decrees that such signs “may be installed no more than 90 days prior to the balloting for which it was prepared, and shall be removed within 10 calendar days following the decisive vote.” The proposed amendment to the ordinance removes the 90-days-prior language and would grant citizens the right to leave such signs up for a month following an election rather than 10 days. The current ordinance also limits signs to no more than eight square feet in area on private property and 32 square feet on commercial property. The amendment being voted on Tuesday merely says that a “political sign may not exceed 32 square feet in area” and makes no distinction between private and commercial property.
The ordinance became an issue after Lafayette Consolidated Government warned some campaigns whose yard signs began proliferating over the spring — well outside the current 90-day window — that they were in violation of the law. Former Assistant District Attorney Keith Stutes, who is seeking to unseat his former boss, DA Mike Harson, and who is the most visible beneficiary of the signs, made a First Amendment case in challenging the 90-day threshold.
The council blinked, and LCG’s legal department drafted the proposed amendments.
Y’all ready for 12-foot “Vitter 2015” signs on your neighbor's roofs soon?
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
OCT 22 This entertaining short (15 minutes) film on Munchies is all about Boudin. Thank goodness it's just a documentary-style piece filled with the voices and faces of south Louisiana, as opposed to outsiders waxing poetic about our regional specialties. But be warned, there is some pretty graphic pig butchery going on here, so if you're squeamish it may not be for you.
OCT 22 A state judge threw out the lawsuit of a former employee of the LSU Alumni Association, the Advocate reports here. The employee had claimed the former director of the group gave her a job so she'd have sex with him, and after she left agreed to continue to pay her -- so she'd have sex with him. Apparently you get no points for hutzpah.
OCT 22 Education blogger Mike Deshotels writes about the retraction of the Cowen report in this post. However you slice it, the Recovery School District is still failing, he says. (But Mike, doesn't that depend on what the intention was? If no one ever meant the RSD to fix public education, it's working perfectly, isn't it?)
OCT 22 A major Jindal donor was allowed to avoid the competitive bid process in the purchase of a state office building in Monroe, blogger Tom Aswell reports in this post on Louisiana Voice. The circumstances he lays out here are pretty stinky.
OCT 22 While Govs. Bobby Jindal and Rick Perry attempt to fan the flames of Fox Newsian hysteria into viable presidential hopes with talk of building walls to keep out the Ebola, LA Times columnist Mike Hiltzik gives them some national press they probably don't want: if you want to save lives, he says, try accepting Medicaid expansion. Wups!
OCT 22 It's hard to pick out the most interesting part of this post on Mother Jones about Texas lieutenant governor candidate Dan Patrick (His claim that migrant workers will bring leprosy to Texas? That Connie Chung's show should be called "Slanted Eye to Eye"?) But of course we must go with the comments about our very own Duck people, and how they are the spokesmen for God.
OCT 22 Advocate owner (and rich guy) John Georges must be doing a little happy dance today. As his paper reports here, the Times Picayune is further reducing its footprint in NOLA, by laying off 100 people and moving their printing operations to Mobile. (Yes, Alabama.) Does this mean the Advocate won?
OCT 22 Baton Rouge's downtown is now starting to show significant growth, this post on DIG Baton Rouge reports. With new construction, new restaurants and new housing units popping up, the downtown area is finally starting to look like a capital city, the story says.
OCT 21 Two St. John Parish employees were indicted in connection with the amoeba found in the parish water supply, WVUE reports in this post. They are accused of lying about testing the water for proper chlorine levels, the story says, claims that were contradicted by their government vehicles' GPS records.
OCT 21 The McClatchy DC blog posts this fascinating view of Louisiana's political landscape. It's a little heavy on the cliches, and also a little heavy on the quaint Cajun/Creole shtick, but it's still good reading -- if only for the outside view of our insides.
OCT 21 Here's an interesting story from the National Journal about New Orleans almost 10 years post-Katrina. There are demographic information and charts, as well as some commentary about the corresponding changes in the way the city looks and works.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly