This week in clutter: Council set to bend on political signs
[Update: The introductory ordinance was approved by the council Tuesday night; it will be voted on for final adoption on July 15.]
Ceding to the political class’ First Amendment right to diminish Lafayette’s already compromised aesthetic appeal — we’re thinking of you Johnston Street — the City-Parish Council is set to vote tonight (Tuesday) on watering down the section of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance pertaining to political signs. If approved, the change would likely lead to a proliferation of temporary candidate/issue signs that already clutter our fair city.
Photo by Robin May
Currently, the CZO decrees that such signs “may be installed no more than 90 days prior to the balloting for which it was prepared, and shall be removed within 10 calendar days following the decisive vote.” The proposed amendment to the ordinance removes the 90-days-prior language and would grant citizens the right to leave such signs up for a month following an election rather than 10 days. The current ordinance also limits signs to no more than eight square feet in area on private property and 32 square feet on commercial property. The amendment being voted on Tuesday merely says that a “political sign may not exceed 32 square feet in area” and makes no distinction between private and commercial property.
The ordinance became an issue after Lafayette Consolidated Government warned some campaigns whose yard signs began proliferating over the spring — well outside the current 90-day window — that they were in violation of the law. Former Assistant District Attorney Keith Stutes, who is seeking to unseat his former boss, DA Mike Harson, and who is the most visible beneficiary of the signs, made a First Amendment case in challenging the 90-day threshold.
The council blinked, and LCG’s legal department drafted the proposed amendments.
Y’all ready for 12-foot “Vitter 2015” signs on your neighbor's roofs soon?
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
SEP 20 Jim Brown is blogging about ISIS and the Middle East in this week's post. Mostly, he's posing questions about our involvement there, now and over the past 10 years. Should we be there? Why are we considering involvement now? All good questions - and most without easy answers.
SEP 20 Louisiana is once again winning a race nobody is running, by topping the nation in the gap between what women and men are paid for the same work, WWL reports here. Women here are paid about two-thirds of what men are paid, the story reports. Great.
SEP 20 This isn't the first story, and it won't be the last, written about the apparent conflict between Bobby Jindal's biology degree from Brown and the far right evangelicals who (he perceives) hold the key to his burning, blinding desire to be President. But this one's on ThinkProgress.org, a left-leaning blog, and gives an interesting view of how his dilemma might be attacked in a campaign.
SEP 20 The Lens updates us on the continuing saga of the levee board that dared to challenge Big Oil. The terms of two members of the board have expired, and the committee recommending replacements voted Thursday. The vote, which was narrow, would preserve the suit's majority on the board, Bob Marshall writes.
SEP 20 This post on the Dads Gone Wild blog is an ode to the education bloggers who have been akin to voices crying in the wilderness on the subject of "reform." He compares his experience, listening to the "reformers" and wondering why anybody gave them any weight, with loving punk rock in the 1970s. It's an interesting read.
SEP 19 Here's an interesting post from the Advocate's Mark Ballard about some of the maneuvering that preceded a court ruling this week on the so-called Edmonson Amendment. It seems that some weirdness did occur on the eve of the hearing, and when this was written, Ballard wasn't even sure the ruling would occur.
SEP 20 Jeremy Alford examines the Family Forum's influence on the Legislature in this post. The ultra conservative lobby's annual "report card" keeps up with how well our elected officials are following its dictates, he reports, but also shows us how conservative our Legislature has become.
SEP 20 This post on NOLA Defender details the current discussion in New Orleans about accommodating bicycles in the CBD. Unfortunately, the catalyst was the terrible death of a bike rider, the post reports. Adding space for bikes sounds good - but it means the loss of travel lanes and parking spaces already at a premium in the city, the debate goes.
SEP 18 Here's a story in the New York Times about a New Iberia man who is trying to save his own little corner of Louisiana. A lot of people spend their spare time clearing their land, but Matt Conn works to restore the natural state of his property. It's a fascinating story.
SEP 18 This post on Howard Fineman's Political Read blog takes a look at the fine line that Bobby Jindal will have to walk if he wants to be the guy who can unite the creationists who don't believe in evolution with the Christians and others who do. On paper, Jindal could be the guy to do it, Fineman says, but politically, he'll have to start with the far right if he wants to get anywhere in the GOP.
SEP 18 Sure, Louisiana Congressional candidate Lenar Whitney made the first page of Politifact's "Pants on Fire" statements section, and of course that's always entertaining. But really you need to go check out the Pulitzer Prize winning fact-checking website, which is run by former Lafayette journalist Angie Drobnic Holan, because it has a great new design.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly