News -> INDReporter TUE, MAR 23 9:25AM by Nathan Stubbs

State to challenge health care reform

State Attorney General Buddy Caldwell says he will pursue a legal challenge a federal health care overhaul passed Sunday night by Congress and which President Obama plans to sign into law today. WWL in New Orleans is reporting Caldwell's office says it will be pursuing the issue, but is yet to decide whether it will be joining a coalition with other states or filing a separate lawsuit.

Yesterday Gov. Bobby Jindal blasted the bill as "bad for Louisiana" and "bad for our country." He asked Caldwell to look into legal remedies, including challenging the bill on the basis of the 10th amendment which deals with state sovereignty and the bill's use of a commerce clause to force people to purchase health insurance.

The healthcare legislation will reduce funding that now goes to the LSU-run charity hospital system, while at the same time forcing an expansion of Medicaid that will cost the state an estimated $345 million when fully phased in, in the year 2021.


Comments (10)add
...
written by nolaf , March 23, 2010 - 04:10 pm
On a very basic level, I find it a bit ironic that on today's TheInd.com page is this article ("State to challenge health care reform") alongside another article entitled "Survey: La.’s legal climate 2nd worst in nation". Keep up the good work La. gov't! We certainly didn't vote for change here!

...
written by Plumpy , March 23, 2010 - 04:18 pm
Good luck with that...Federal Judicial System is mostly Liberal thinking judges..Obama Care is here to stay...Our only hope is that in 2012 enough opposition candidates can be elected and make major changes ...ITS CHRISTMAS TIME AGAIN...PRAISE OUR SAVIOR President OBAMA...(im being sarcastic)
...
written by Bush , March 23, 2010 - 06:32 pm
So "forcing people to buy insurance" is less constitutional than forcing hospitals to treat them without pay, thereby forcing us to pay those costs in thier prices? I would rather see the Governor push for removal of malpractice insurance. I wonder what the Attorney General thinks about that?
...
written by JL , March 23, 2010 - 07:13 pm
A law that foreces citizens to buy a good or service they may not need is not only unconsititutional but sets a very dangerous precedent..what else will the government want us to buy in the future for the greater good...if this is allowed. Practically removes all limits from the Federal Govt when it comes to the commerce clause and IMO makes the 10th amendment practically meaningless.
...
written by SupremeRevenge , March 23, 2010 - 07:24 pm
I can't wait for the supreme court to get this case. The way our Supreme Leader and Savior Obama treated our supreme court justices at his state of the union pep rally...revenge is a dish best served cold.
...
written by hmmm , March 23, 2010 - 07:32 pm
"Federal Judicial System is mostly Liberal thinking judges.." -- The only way you can think that is true is if you are somewhere to the extreme right of David Duke and the KKK. Do you knw who was appointing judges to the federal bench 20 of the last 30 years? Put down your tea cup my friend (I'm being sarcastic about the friend part.)
...
written by hmmm , March 23, 2010 - 07:56 pm
"what else will the government want us to buy in the future for the greater good...if this is allowed." -- I heard the government might require us to buy car insurance :)
...
written by Morrow , March 23, 2010 - 09:01 pm
More grandstanding by our illustrious governor! He must have been drooling waiting for this to happen! I can't believe he's actually in the state! He can't address the conditions of this state, esp. roads, but he can put his mug on the tele to grandstand about how he's going to sue the federal government..... He's such a jerk.
...
written by Northsidian , March 23, 2010 - 10:01 pm
Then lil Bobbie will go to the feds for another handout to overcome his do nothing leadership. Louisiana politicians are so full of s***!
...
written by Lou Rom on KVOL , March 24, 2010 - 07:53 pm
So, Bobby Jindal, who would not know the Constitution if it hit him in the head, is upset about congress passing the HC bill? Maybe, if during his 14 years in public office (appointed and elected) he did a freaking thing to enhance health care services for the masses the fed would not have to step in? Also, Jindal should worry about the sea of Freedom of Information Act challenges and public records requests he's about to be nailed with for his absolute disregard for the constitution and government in the sunshine, rather than lament a problem he and so many governors have had countless opportunities to correct.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it