News -> INDReporter TUE, MAR 30 10:44AM by Walter Pierce

Update: Council reverses PZC vote

[Editor's Note: The CPC Tuesday voted 4-2 in favor of residents living near the proposed development.]

The Lafayette City-Parish Council Tuesday evening will hear an appeal from a north Lafayette Parish property owner of a Planning, Zoning & Codes vote to award preliminary plat approval to Andries & Associates for construction of an 18-lot residential development on six and a half acres in an unincorporated part of the parish. Because the area is not within a city’s corporate boundaries it is not zoned. The subdivision, if cleared by council and if the developers meet subsequent requirements of the parish, will be called Evangeline Acres.

PZC granted the plat approval at its Feb. 22 meeting. The panel in December rejected an earlier proposal by Andries and Associates, citing objections by the state Department of Health and Hospitals over plans to have individual sewer and water systems for the subdivision. The developers agreed to connect the subdivision to the North Water District.

The appellant, Thomas Stith, lives on a street adjacent to the proposed development and argues in his appeal that the subdivision will lead to crime:

Developer is planning on doing minimal improvements to the property (private gravel road, individual septic systems for each house, and no mention of street lights in plans) next door to an already existing blighted / high crime area. Satinwood residents are concerned this is likely to attract more of the criminal element into the area and greatly effect [sic] safety and quality of life for the existing residents.

The council will also vote on a zoning change recommended by PZC that would reduce the minimum time interval between images displayed on on-site digital signs from eight seconds to three seconds.

The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. in the council auditorium.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (1)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , April 01, 2010 - 08:10 am
And Bertrand voted against the people, and for the developers. A consistent record of this, as he voted exactly the same way when the people of Scott tried to stop a development there.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it