News -> INDReporter TUE, JUN 1 5:46PM by Walter Pierce

CPC tightens noose on downtown bars

The Lafayette City-Parish Council voted Tuesday to adopt tough new measures to deal with downtown bars that fail to pay their monthly law enforcement levy in a timely fashion. Ordinance 95, which the council passed by a 5-2 vote, allows LCG to impose liquor license suspensions against scofflaw night clubs. The ordinance stipulates a 3-day suspension for a first offense, a 30-day suspension for a second offense and a one-year suspension for a third offense; the second and third violations must occur within a year of the first violation in order for the stiffer penalties to apply.

Within the "whereas" section of the ordinance, "certain establishments failing to pay their Special Law Enforcement Levy in a timely manner" is cited among the reasons for the new law.

District 3 Councilman Brandon Shelvin, who represents downtown Lafayette and has been an advocate for bar owners in their fight against the levies, tried unsuccessfully to head the ordinance off at the pass — or to at least stall it — by offering a motion to table the ordinance for two weeks. His colleague from neighboring District 4, Kenneth Boudreaux, seconded the motion, which received four votes from the seven council members present. However, according to parliamentary rules, Shelvin’s motion needed five votes to pass.

Voting for the ordinance were council members Purvis Morrison (District 1), Jay Castille (2), Boudreaux, Don Bertrand (7) and Keith Patin (8). Councilmen Shelvin and Jared Bellard (District 5) voted against; Sam Dore (6) and William Theriot (9) were absent Tuesday.

Per the state law governing suspension of liquor licenses, bars facing a suspension would have the right to appeal.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (9)add
...
written by B. S. Skinner , June 02, 2010 - 01:46 am
Noose? It not the use of that word illegal in Louisiana?
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , June 02, 2010 - 12:56 pm
""" Whereas, Whoseas ? Huh ? Something is definitely missing in this scenario...Oh, its Thoseas, Dore and Theriot "THE ALPO KIDS !
...
written by Word up , June 02, 2010 - 03:56 pm
Property owners should bear in mind that a property serving as a bar can never again be a bar if it does not operate as one for one year. That's how the downtown ordinance reads.
...
written by CSB , June 02, 2010 - 04:42 pm
The downtown authority and city council will be kicking themselves in the ass, when a large developer comes into lafayette and builds an entertainment complex. All of the big bar owners and restaurants are willing to leave in a heartbeat in order to not have to deal with this BS. Downtown will then be back to what it once was, a place for bums and drugs. It is going to happen. There have already been talks about it.
...
written by Buckley , June 02, 2010 - 05:24 pm
CSB-
Well, at least it will get rid of the bums and drugs IN the bars, no?
...
written by Blicero , June 02, 2010 - 08:03 pm
"...and suddenly a profound silence fell over the once loud and proud..."
Kapitan Dieter Dietz, commenting on the reaction of the Germans High Command to the news that the Allies had succeeded in their invasion of Normandy
...
written by meetzmurder , June 03, 2010 - 01:29 am
CSB-
Not sure I follow-
"The downtown authority...city council..kicking their ass when...a large developer comes in and builds an entertainment center.."
It would seem to me that they would be very happy if that would happen...more development, more tax revenue; then:"all the big bar owners and restaurants would be willing to leave in a hurry"
And go where exactly? River Ranch? You think they'd put up with their crap for two seconds?Do they really have the acumen to be something other than bar keeps? And why would the restaurants move? They don't pay a levy.
Then: "downtown would go back to a what it was...a place for bums and drugs" Maybe it would not go back that far...maybe it would just go back to the place of hope and promise before it got puked and pissed all over.
Then: "it's going to happen. There have already been talks about it".Talks about what, among whom? Where exactly you going with that? Cause you know, talk is cheap. And talk can proceed easily without constraint of much in the way of logical construct,if you follow me.Which you don't.
...
written by realitychecks , June 03, 2010 - 11:36 am
This is double taxation and so selective! The only policing of vagrants happens after serious injury; otherwise they are ignored. The residents are not properly protected from the far more serious problems of the free roaming criminals, chronically mentally ill, unsupervised 1/2 way and 3/4 houses, etc. all drawn to the area by the non-tax paying, but tax taking social agencies.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 03, 2010 - 09:33 pm
Did not City Parish Government issue the occupational licenses for each one of these bars? And the liquor licenses? Through greed, incompetence, or mistake, LCPG created this problem.

How much money has LCPG spent on consultants to help with planning and zoning? They didn't see this coming? Doesn't take a soothsayer to see that too many bars in too small an area would lead to crime, violence, and pissing in the streets. Especially not in a city where people have been moaning about the EXACT SAME THING a mile up the road--McKinley Street stip.

I think these bar owners should hire an attorney and take the city to court over this. Is this new ordinance not an ex post facto law?
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it