News -> INDReporter THU, AUG 19 10:29AM by Mary Tutwiler

Who does it benefit to call the Gulf oil spill cleaned up, if it is not?

On August 4, Carol Browner, special adviser to the president for energy and climate change, appeared on NBC’s Today Show and CBS’s The Early Show to announce that 75 percent of the oil in the Gulf from the BP spill was gone.

“The vast majority of the oil has been contained, it’s been burned, it’s been cleaned and that’s good news for the people of the Gulf,” she said on CBS.

Browner was backed up by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration chief Jane Lubchenco, whose office issued a five-page report which said that only 52.7 million gallons out of the approximately 172 million gallons that spewed into the water from the broken BP well remained.

Immediately, scientists from Gulf Coast states began to dispute the numbers, saying that nearly 80 percent of the oil is still under the surface in the form of dispersed droplets. Today’s Advocate lays out the scientific dispute:
Chuck Hopkinson, director of the University of Georgia’s Sea Grant program and one of the leaders of that school’s study, said only 21 percent of the oil is likely “gone” by evaporation, burning, skimming and containment.

The rest of the oil — or 2.9 million to 3.2 million barrels — is still likely in the water, Hopkinson said.

“The idea that 75 percent of the oil is gone and is of no further concern to the environment is just absolutely absurd,” Hopkinson said.
Hopkinson is joined by other scientists from all over the country in disputing the federal government’s numbers. Again, from The Advocate:
“I don’t believe the numbers in this report,” Rick Steiner, a marine conservationist who retired as a professor at the University of Alaska after 30 years — including during the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, said.
“There’s no way to judge the veracity of the estimates they make without knowing how they came up with them. And for a scientific report, it’s only four pages long. I mean, come on.”
The question this conflicting information raises in my mind is why would the federal government want to spin a story based on inadequate science? Who does it benefit to call the Gulf cleaned up, if it is not?

Gulf fishermen, shrimpers in particular, whose season opened Monday, are wary of the government’s good news. While they may have a motive to protest the clean bill of health because of lawsuits against BP, most shrimpers I know, and I’ve interviewed quite a few over the years, have salt water in their blood. More than anything else, they have told me that shrimping is their way of life and they don’t know how they will survive if they can’t face the dawn with their motors thumping and nets dragging the green waters of the Gulf.

Their fear is that if they begin shrimping now, before they are convinced that microscopic droplets of oil bonded with the dispersant Corexit are truly gone from Gulf marine life, they will deliver contaminated shrimp to the dock, and a skeptical public will forever condemn Gulf shrimp as polluted.

The shrimpers, it seems, are more cautious than our federal agencies when it comes to our health and safety.

It’s especially perplexing since the White House has been so cautious about the drilling industry. If the administration feels the need to hold up oil exploration and drilling in the Gulf until they are satisfied that adequate safety regulations are in place, it seems logical to take the time to really understand what is going on under the waters of the Gulf of Mexico before declaring the oil gone and seafood safe to eat.

I know there is enormous pressure from business owners all along the Gulf Coast, who are suffering the worst economic disaster of their lives. That’s where the BP restitution funds come in, to replace a lost season’s worth of earnings. By declaring the Gulf nearly free of oil, the federal government seems to be undermining its own case against BP. Frankly, I don’t understand it.


Comments (4)add
...
written by Regurgitator , August 20, 2010 - 03:17 pm
Nice analysis.

Not to be picky, but I'll be picky here because it's important to stay accurate in this particular case because of the monumental task of holding BP accountable.

Ref. the headline.
It isn't and should never be called the "Gulf" oil spill. It IS (caps for emphasis) and always should be called the "BP" oil spill.

I need a life ...
...
written by Mary Tutwiler , August 20, 2010 - 04:12 pm
Point taken.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , August 20, 2010 - 04:20 pm
REGGUR, WHERE YOU STANDING DUDE, that you see the oil spill thats two of us , it was a just matter of time that OBAMA would publically repay his oil crony benefactors.....You should stand by and watch the huge tax-break going to BRITISH POLLUTERS , NOW NOT MANY OF YOU ARE AWARE, THAT WITH THIS GULF SPILL, BRITISH POLLUTERS surged ahead of our own TEXACO AS THE MOST PROLIFIC, NOT GIVE A DAMN, " OIL HABITUAL POLLUTERS IN THE OIL INDUSTRY IN THE WORLD ! FOR THE GOVERNMENT COVER-UP MOUTHPIECES who claim the Oil Spill has evaporated, STUPIDOS "High Gravity Condensate" evaporates into the atmosphere, HELLO GREEN GAS ? Listen-up DUMMYS !
OIL of a low gravity such as the BRITISH POLLUTERS SPILL, DOES NOT , I REPEAT "DOES NOT EVAPORATE (MAYBE IN A THOUSAND YEARS ) INTO THE ATMOSPHERE, or disintegrate I CAN PROVE THIS TO THE KISS-ASS OBAMA, MY FAMILIES BATHING SUITS ARE NOW OIL-DYED NOT TIE DYED FROM THEIR RECENT VACATION IN DESTIN FLORIDA ! GO TO HELL BP ( BRITISH POLLUTERS AND TAKE THE Muslim Ogre with you .........
THE ONLY OIL NOT PRESENT IN OUR GULF WATERS IS THE OIL CONTAINED IN THE ABSORBENT BOOMS AND THE SMALL AMOUNT VACUUMED WITH THE MILLIONS OF SALT WATER......YEAH THE OIL HAS DISPERED TO BROWNSVILLE ALRIGHT, WESTERNLY TO PADRE ISLAND AND EASTERNLY TO DESTIN FLORIDA,
DAMN YOU BP !
...
written by wondering , August 23, 2010 - 11:46 am
I am wondering what will happen with next years crop of shrimp if there is considerable oil, unaccounted for, in the marshes.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it