News -> INDReporter FRI, SEP 3 11:44AM by Leslie Turk

CLECO fights back on coal ash contamination claim

The coal-fired Rodemacher plant in Boyce, which is half-owned by Lafayette Utilities System, is among several facilities cited for causing toxic groundwater contamination by a report released this week. But CLECO, which owns a third of the plant and half of another cited, says not so fast.

Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice and the Sierra Club issued a report this week on what they call a nationwide problem involving coal ash contamination of groundwater. The report, “In Harm’s Way: Lack of Federal Coal Ash Regulations Endangers Americans and Their Environment” points to more than three dozen new sites in 21 states where it alleges toxic coal waste has made water supplies unsafe, including parts of Pointe Coupee, Rapides and De Soto Parishes, where the coal-fired plants Big Cajun 2, Rodemacher and Dolet Hills operate, respectively. “In Harm’s Way” documents what it calls the steadily growing number of waters known to be poisoned by poor management of the toxic ash left over after coal is burned for electricity.

But CLECO is dismissing much of the report as inaccurate, at least as it pertains to Rodemacher and Dolet Hills. “The report had so many factual errors in it, and it also had a lot of misleading conclusions in it," says Robbie Laborde, CLECO’s general manager of environmental services. “We’d have to correct basically everything they said,” Laborde responds when asked for specifics about the alleged inaccuracies. “You know who put it out. It’s obviously from their point of view.”

Beginning with what he calls a misleading subtitle, the report insinuates a lack of coal ash regulation, Laborde notes, and that’s simply not the case — at least in this state. “I can speak for Louisiana, and Louisiana has been the one regulating. DEQ, our Louisiana environmental regulatory agency, has been regulating this since 1986 or ’87. So we have been subject to regulations for more than 20 years now, and our state is actually one of the more aggressive states that regulate this. Specifically we have been submitting semi-annual reports, where we take groundwater monitoring data, to the DEQ,” Laborde continues. “And we’ve been doing that since we’ve been regulated. And those reports show no groundwater contamination. The conclusions [the report] drew, especially for our facilities, [which is what] we’ll speak for, were false.”

It is indeed primarily federal regulators the report takes to task. “For years nobody, including the Environmental Protection Agency, has had a full picture of how much toxic waste is out there, where it is, or if it’s staying put. It has been dumped with no federal oversight, and utterly inadequate state policies,” says Jordan Macha, Sierra Club representative for the Sierra Club. “Now that we’re aware of the problem, it seems we are finding contamination everywhere we look.”

Toxic heavy metals, arsenic and lead were consistently found at levels well above what is considered safe for drinking water, according to the report. Its data shows that this toxic coal ash pollution is flowing into nearby communities, polluting private drinking water wells and even putting some public water supply wells at risk. The pollution in coal ash is known to cause cancer, organ disease, respiratory illnesses, and neurological damage and developmental problems, according to the Sierra Club.

“Communities affected by fly ash could gain protection from the EPA as well as be eligible for cleanup,” continues Macha. “The adoption of stronger federal regulation could change the health of untold numbers of regular folks whose only crime was living near a fly ash dumpsite but received the penalty of ill health. Clean air and clean water is a basic human right that no one should be denied.”

The report claims that nationwide states responsible for only four of the 35 sites have required an investigation to determine the scale of pollution. Not one state has required the toxic pollution to be stopped, the report claims, let alone cleaned up — further underscoring the need for strong federal regulations.

The report comes just days before the EPA begins a series of hearings across the country to gather public comment on new protections from toxic coal ash. On Sept. 8, a delegation of concerned residents from Louisiana will be attending the EPA hearing in Dallas to express their concerns regarding coal ash contamination across the state. Details on national hearings, including the Dallas hearing, can be found here.

Read the full report here.


Comments (7)add
...
written by What? , September 03, 2010 - 09:21 pm
? Why is there a coal fired plant in Louisiana in the first place? As far as I know there are no coal mines in our state, but plenty of natural gas...
...
written by Reply to What: , September 04, 2010 - 12:42 am
It is often cheaper to burn Powder River Basin coal than natural gas.

We all want a cleaner environment until we find out our electric bill is going up due to increased environmental controls on power plants. Fuel related expenses are generally passed on to the customer.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 04, 2010 - 04:55 pm
What?--

I'm not sure, but I think coal is the cheapest fuel for power plants available. I think the price of coal is quite a bit less volatile than natural gas, too.

Now, if a utility could develop its own natural gas fields, that would insulate it from price fluctuations alot better than hedging in the commodity futures market. But the federal government won't allow that.
...
written by JamesR , September 05, 2010 - 12:07 pm
State regulators would probably never agree to a regulated utility owning natural gas fields and burning that gas in their own plants since the price of the fuel is passed on to the the customer. Customers would be exposed to over priced gas. It is my understanding that state regulators do encourage utilities to hedge their fuel purchases. We all want a cleaner environment until we find out our electric bill is going up due to increased environmental controls on power plants.

...
written by Jason D. Faulk , September 05, 2010 - 07:21 pm
There is a coal mine in Louisiana, not far from the Dolet Hills power plant. Remember Mansfield's Historic Civil War Battlefield?
Well part of it was destroyed to get at the coal.
It is not a dense high-grade coal, it's is the worst polluting type of coal, but it is coal.

Coal is only "cheaper" because a great quantity of the pollution generated by coal-mining and coal-burning is not regulated or poorly enforced if regulated, unlike some of the other extraction sectors which have previously confronted problems in the past and somewhat successfully have seen cleanup take place to remediate ground water problems generated at disposal cites, and rules put in place since 1970 per law to begin tackling these problems.

Coal however, is allowed to remove mountain tops, over 500 in Appalachia, and surface mines elsewhere, upon which point the rules in place if any, allow for what amounts to long term disruption of people's ground water, surface water in creeks and rivers, and the loss of the land they sit on, because they did not own the "mineral rights" beneath which trumped their land ownership rights.
Coal also through this sloppy disposal process upon burning, essentially is again, externalizing all community, citizen and environmental costs onto us individually, our families and on the public treasury.
There is no $20 Billion BP fund for this one, yet it is spread throughout this country.

Many of us don't know about it, because we don't live next to it. Consider this though, if your water comes from a ground source or a surface source that becomes polluted, your city will pay more for treatment, if it can. If it cannot, EPA might put a fine on the water utility, which then means either your local government has to borrow more money, or the federal government will borrow more money to grant it back to the locals to pay for the improvements.

One way or another, this COSTS US in the end.

The only solution is to put the REAL COST of using coal as an electricity source INTO the cost of the kilowatt hour generated by coal. When that happens, investing in efficiency will make a lot more sense, as will other less-polluting and other more renewable systems of power generation.

But you all know, this is Louisiana, and we sure love to be dumped on, so just keep it coming, will keep taking the cancers and the mental-neurological problems and we'll keep passing a good time.
...
written by Plumpy , September 06, 2010 - 06:16 pm
If people would cut back on their electric usage. We wouldn't need these coal monster's. I pray that our heroic president Obama is reading Environmental Integrity Project, Earthjustice and the Sierra Club report. Hopefully our Energy chief Dr. Steven Chu and EPA chief Lisa Jackson will band together and shut down these EARTH KILLER'S...
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , September 08, 2010 - 03:54 am
Plumpy, "click" brrrrrrr, you hear that, OBAMA & LISA and CHU, just lowered their AC units, so turn your AC up, and help save our planet ! No-one ever died of lung cancer breathing depleted gas fumes, what about coal residue ?
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it