News -> INDReporter TUE, SEP 28 10:47AM by Mary Tutwiler

Coastal restoration still in limbo, the price keeps rising

The latest price tag is a whopper: $80 to $100 billion to prevent losing the lower third of the state by 2050. That’s the number Louisiana state officials are citing as the current cost of coastal restoration, according to National Public Radio.

In a highly charged partisan year where political parties are in attack mode over what they perceive as the slightest weakness, Louisiana’s Republicans and Democrats speak with a united voice, urging that the fines BP will pay to the federal government go to protecting Louisiana’s wetlands.

With the national focus turning away from the Gulf of Mexico now that the immediate crisis of oil gushing into the Gulf is over, it is imperative that the state keep the need for coastal restoration in the minds of Congress. Even with the recent memory of tragedy and anguish over the loss of livelihood and culture, funding Louisiana’s coastal projects continues to be a hard sell.

“If New York state had lost an area the size of Delaware, you don’t think we’d have fixed it? I mean, it’s just ridiculous,” R. King Milling, chairman of America’s Wetland Foundation, told NPR. “When you think about it in that context, it absolutely falls within the area of ridiculousness. We should find a way as a country to fix something of this magnitude.”


Comments (2)add
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , September 28, 2010 - 11:07 pm
Let's ask R. King Milling if Shell Oil is going to pay their share of the wetland loss due to canal cuts and underground subsidence from extraction.
It's estimated that 1/3rd of coastal land loss is due to these influences.

Most of the mineral extraction companies are not interested in returning the costs they received for free from our state. They'd rather the federal government and the state government pick up the cost.
Well, our governments already have to pick up their share of the cost for having built all those levees and starved the wetlands.

It's a symbiotic relationship where multiple parties are responsible and all must be required to step up and honor their moral obligations to make this right.

We'll never be "made whole" as they say in the legal community, but we would like a chance at survival, at preserving the lands that preserve our people which preserve our culture.
...
written by HARD HAT , September 30, 2010 - 12:22 pm
Jason, in a nutshell, the oil companies paid for slucing up the marshes, Texaco paid off the Long's for every inch of canal dug, but that was befor you time then the payoff continued with the following political dynastys sharing the pie.
Why would the state look the other way, "for our illustrious leaders personal gain ", do you really believe the oil companys were allowed up cut up our state without paying, "SOMEONE OFF !
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it