News -> INDReporter MON, OCT 25 10:08AM by Walter Pierce

Charter commish: Final meeting before deliberations begin

The Lafayette Charter Commission holds its final meeting Monday before the scheduled commencement of deliberations on Nov. 1.

For the last two weeks, commissioners have discussed various models of governance for Lafayette Parish, most of which involve the creation of separate city and parish councils with a mayor or president similar to the forms of government that prevailed in the parish pre-consolidation, with one common caveat: Lafayette Parish government would have a council but no bureaucracy of departments and would instead use intergovernmental agreements with the six municipalities — Broussard, Carencro, Duson, Lafayette, Scott and Youngsville — to provide services to residents living in unincorporated parts of the parish.

However, Commissioner Don Bacque, a city resident, has remain steadfastly opposed to adding layers of governance, arguing the cost of creating new positions — specifically a city council and mayor for Lafayette — would be prohibitive.

In a letter last Tuesday, Bacque wrote to fellow commissioners:

It is my belief that the parish citizens are looking for the simplest, most cost efficient manner of addressing the current charter’s shortcomings. This is not based on any empirical data, just a feeling that citizens do not understand or trust government, so the complex and expensive is very easy to dismiss. With that in mind, I proposed what is, in my opinion, the simplest revision to the governance structure that allows Lafayette City to regain its autonomy, with no added governmental expenditure. My suggestion would replicate the current LPUA.

I propose that the current 9 council districts be retained, concurrent with school board districts. This alleviates the expense of separate re-zoning and justice department clearance. Of the nine city parish council members, those 5, with the largest percentage concentration of city residents, would become the Lafayette City Council, and vote on issues that pertain only to the city of Lafayette. The entire 9 members would vote on parish issues. Although 4 current council members would have no vote on city issues, they would be allowed to be involved in the pre-vote discussion of the issues, and could make the wishes of their city constituents, if any, known.

What Bacque’s proposed model fails to address is the disenfranchisement of city residents who live in the four predominately rural, non-city of Lafayette districts; it is the reason the full nine-member council has long voted on matters expressly reserved for the LPUA in the Home Rule Charter. In an email exchange with The Independent in response to his proposal, Bacque said he believes also electing a single at-large council member to represent only city of Lafayette residents would address the enfranchisement issue, although a 10-member city-parish council would present a considerable challenge, namely the likelihood of 5-5 stalemates.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (9)add
...
written by bacque crap , October 25, 2010 - 10:50 am
"Although 4 current council members would have no vote on city issues, they would be allowed to be involved in the pre-vote discussion of the issues, and could make the wishes of their city constituents, if any, known."
 
Give the City of Lafayette the same standing as the other parish cities. Why should non city council members have a say in city issues, even if representing city constituents – who is to say these council members would not still have an allegiance to the parish over the city.  Otherwise give the Lafayette city constituents the same say in the affairs of the other parish cities (give up your Mayor - Councils or get out of City of Lafayette business).
...
written by Unempirical Observer , October 25, 2010 - 02:18 pm
Uhhh, has Bacque been listening at all?
The city wants full autonomy. Your solution is no good.
Worried about stalemates, just add 2 at-large seats.
While at it, just make them all at-large, X number total, and Y number must be pulled from City registered candidates.
Problem solved, sorta.
Not a good solution though.
Separate councils and a mayor, one set of employees and services.
...
written by andymhebert , October 25, 2010 - 03:48 pm
How are the votes to be counted? If a majority of the City of Lafayette registered voters vote no to a "change", will it fail even if Parish votes are more as a parish count? In other words, it failed in the City but passed in the Parish.

Will the City have a separate ballot from the Parish? One person for one vote. Or will their vote be counted twice like in the original election.
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 26, 2010 - 07:25 am
Look. It's all very simple. There are more parish residents than city residents. Parish residents like consolidated government just fine the way it is. So whatever the commish comes up with, parish voters will vote it down anyway. So Lafayette is stuck like chuck.

only way out for Lafayette city is to annex enough unincorporated area to make city residents outnumber parish residents again.
...
written by bacque crap , October 26, 2010 - 09:01 am
Ahh -  yes, a “simple” ballot that reads:
 
Full Consolidation of all Lafayette Parish Cities with no separate Mayor – Councils for any  city in the parish (no city can vote to opt out either all in or all out).
 
Yes (Yes – means all cities in the Parish dissolve their separate government and all cities are then governed by the Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government).
 
No (All cities in the Parish have their own separate Mayor – Council) with consolidated services with the Lafayette Parish Government).
 
...
written by andymhebert , October 26, 2010 - 10:30 am
"ragin_cajun-only way out for Lafayette city is to annex enough unincorporated area to make city residents outnumber parish residents again."

Or DE-ANNEX your property and join the unincorporated. Last one out pay the city bill!
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 26, 2010 - 11:47 am
"DE-ANNEX your property and join the unincorporated"

WHAT?! I can do that? How do I do that?
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 26, 2010 - 12:54 pm
GA, lets annex CRAPPOVILLE the inhabitants of Crappoville would embrace becoming a part of the community who carries the burden of funding the City Museums, the Beautification of the Grand Ouverture at the Gilded Gates entering the SITE OF the mancave of the LAFAYETTE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT and its CRONY'S. Pray tell whhhhhy any single sane soul residing on the fringe of the CITY LIMITS would consider becoming a part of the most prejudiced group of wannabe elites, inbred one tract couillions .
...
written by andymhebert , October 26, 2010 - 02:26 pm
Why hasn’t there been any discussion or reporting on next weeks “Parishwide Parish Council HRC (Home Rule Charter) – Amend. Sect. 2-02 PC”?

I thought it was a City-Parish Council not a “Parish Council”!

Did the Charter Commission review this proposed “Charter Amendment”?

I hope the press/news agencies address this soon.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it