News -> INDReporter THU, OCT 28 3:37PM by Walter Pierce

Esquire: Vitter one of Congress’ worst

It will likely be of little consequence to his opponent, Democrat Charlie Melancon, but Sen. David Vitter has landed with a thud on Esquire magazine’s list of the “10 Worst Members of Congress,” joining largely on the merits of his family-values hypocrisy the likes of Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachman (crazy), New York Congressman Charlie Rangel (corrupt) and Texas Rep. Joe Barton (corporate panderer).

The magazine writes of Louisiana’s junior senator:

Now, it’s one thing if you’re a whoremonger and make no real pretensions to be anything but. There’s even a kind of Laissez les bon temps rouler integrity to that type of rascal that we may even have to admire a little bit. He is, after all, what he appears to be. Edwin Edwards comes to mind. Remember a few years back when David Duke wrested the Republican nomination for governor of Louisiana to face Democrat Edwards in the general election? All the establishment Republicans panicked about having an actual sheet wearer as their standard-bearer, and so they all lined up behind the colorful Edwards with the slogan: “Vote for the crook. It’s important.” Now, those were the days, way back when slippery characters didn’t pretend to take God’s dictation.

Which brings us to the very special case of David Vitter, who is the worst kind of reprobate to be found in heaven, hell, or Washington. For Vitter is not at all what or who he says he is. A self-described “values conservative,” the public figure of David Vitter that we are all subjected to is a pinched, prissy man who sits in judgment of everyone and won’t shush about Jesus. Just a horrible bore who doesn’t like for sick children to have health insurance, hates family planning, is appalled by gay people and gay marriage and brown people from south of the border and the United Nations, all of which in the Vitter moral universe blur into the same thing: grave threats to the tautly ordered no-fun zone that is David Vitter’s immortal soul.

And, oh, how David Vitter does like to instruct on personal sexual conduct. “Abstinence education is a public-health strategy focused on risk avoidance ... by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice...” says Vitter.

Well, Aristotle and Shakespeare knew where this story was going centuries before any of us were ever born. Because of course David Vitter loves prostitutes. And of course he got caught. And yet he still wears his grotesque mask of righteousness, and Louisiana seems poised to be fooled again by the hypocrite this Election Day. Maybe they should first talk to Mrs. Vitter, who during more innocent times said of Hillary Clinton (and her husband’s manhood), “I’m a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he [David] does something like that,” Wendy Vitter said, “I’m walking away with one thing, and it’s not alimony, trust me.”

See the full list here.

Esquire also ranked what it considers the “10 Best Members of Congress.” No Louisiana politicians made that list.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (30)add
...
written by Joe Politico , October 28, 2010 - 08:52 pm
It is a shame we don't have more Esquire subscribers in Louisiana. If we did maybe more citizens of Louisiana Republican or not might get the fact that Vitter is what is exactly wrong with the Republican Party these days....they can't be trusted and are hypocritical when it comes to social issues.....Family Values Canidate....give me a break.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 29, 2010 - 04:06 am
Vitter raised Wendy's Allowance from his war chest, Wendy is Elated, Vitter DIDDER, then he RIDDER, and he still has Xitter in his pants, he's laughing all the way to the White House.
...
written by YellowDog , October 29, 2010 - 08:28 am
I don't like David Vitter. Notice how his wife is nowhere to be seen, or heard, in the past coupla years? I'd never vote for that whoremongerer, or at least hope I never see the day when I'd consider voting for him. I do however feel very sorry for all those daughters he's rearing. What embarassment those girls must feel knowing what a scum bag dad is. I do believe he keeps them out of state, however. I'd love nothing better than knowing Vitter was out of a job. Vitter looks like the weasel he is.
...
written by Resident , October 29, 2010 - 11:43 am
I'd prefer that legislators say and do nothing about social issues. It's not the job of federal government to tell people how to behave and what they can and can't do with their own bodies. But harping on social issues is another way to divide and conquer, which is really what both parties are all about.
...
written by JM , October 29, 2010 - 01:00 pm
If you're Republican, that's fine. I can respect that. I disagree, but I respect that. But how can anyone--Republican or Democrat--vote for this reprobate?

The tragedy is that he didn't get eliminated in the Republican primary so a better candidate could run.
...
written by Hamburger Helper , October 29, 2010 - 01:18 pm
What's a magazine?

Oh yes, Vote for the whore monger, it's important.
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 29, 2010 - 01:38 pm
"The tragedy is that he didn't get eliminated in the Republican primary so a better candidate could run. "

Absolutely right. I'll say it again, this is much like the nomination of David Duke for governor. The republican party couldn't get its act together to field a serious candidate, so Duke won the primary. That meant that I had to vote for Edwin Edwards for governor. I will never forgive the republican party for that.

This is very similar. If this race were closer, and Melancon actually had a chance to win, I'd be in a position of having to vote for Vitter to keep Melancon out of the US Senate. LA Republican party is a complete embarassment. I'm ready for some "change I can believe in", right here at home, and in the Republican party.
...
written by Resident , October 29, 2010 - 02:50 pm
"If this race were closer, and Melancon actually had a chance to win, I'd be in a position of having to vote for Vitter to keep Melancon out of the US Senate."

How is Melancon worse than Vitter? Just curious. And I don't accept the trope that a Democrat is automatically more "big government" than a Republican.
...
written by Sensible Politics , October 29, 2010 - 03:01 pm
That was a very alarming debate. Senator Vitter refuses to take responsibility for using Prostitutes. His poor wife was probably at home crying her eyes out because she is trapped in a marriage that she can't get from under.

If we vote Senator Vitter back in office, I gaurantee you that he will get caught up again in another Prostitute scandel.

That is one creepy looking dude.
...
written by Sensible Politics , October 29, 2010 - 03:15 pm
After all is said and done-after all the tea party candidates go to congress to sell america to the business and foreign interest, the rejection of them in the succeeding elections will be tremendous.

Senator Vitter is chief among those who will be soundly rejected. Too bad we will have to wait six more years.

By the way, can we in Louisiana do a recall petition to recall a sitting Senator?
...
written by babyboomer , October 29, 2010 - 04:51 pm
My reasoning in wanting Vitter out of office and our lives is that if lied to his wife and family and broke that sacred trust, it is certainly likely he has done and will continue to lie and break the trust of his constituents.
...
written by Turiddu , October 29, 2010 - 06:29 pm
Esquire magazine? Isn't that a STYLE magazine? My parot won't poop on that...he says it's redundant.
...
written by Turiddu , October 29, 2010 - 06:39 pm
Hey babyboomer..."My reasoning in wanting Vitter out of office and our lives is that if lied to his wife and family and broke that sacred trust, it is certainly likely he has done and will continue to lie and break the trust of his constituents."
What a hypocrite you are...it was ok for your man Clinton and John Edwards...and who know how many babies THEY had....
I'd rather have my elected official pay for it, than to break up the lives of whoever your liberal officials did it with.


...
written by Robin May , October 29, 2010 - 09:11 pm
Turiddu,

Hey you ever heard of the word "hypocrite"? That is exactly what Vitter is. Yes Clinton and John Edwards had extramarital affairs. And yes it bothered Democrats. But these 2 politicians didn't claim to be "family values" candidates like Vitter is. It is HUGELY hypocritical for Vitter to be talking family values out of one side of his mouth and calling a prostitute outside the other. Don't you see the hypocrisy in this? He is holier than thou, a "do as I say, don't do as I do" Christian. And for the life of me I don't understand how so called Christians and Tea Partiers who talk family values constantly can't see the hypocrisy in him and get pissed off and throw him out of office. Obviously family values aren't really that important to them.
...
written by Sensible Politics , October 29, 2010 - 10:29 pm
Family values is not what the tea party is about. The tea party is about racism and hate. The tea party is about an inert disappointment with the idea of a black person being president.

If you look at all that Bush and Cheney did to this country, and if you recall that before Obama even swore in as President those white racist was already ginning up hatrate against this man.

As I said previously, they did the same thing to Jessie Owens, Jackie Robinson and others.
...
written by MeMe , October 29, 2010 - 11:47 pm
You cannot recall an elected Senator.

Melancon ran away from his constituents before the election got heated. He would not announce his town hall meetings until the last minute. That way, not many would/could attend. The only reason he had them is because he was planning to run against Vitter. . Charlie is out for Charlie. If you think the Dems don't want him gone, why did they encourage him to attempt to switch houses? He would have likely been a shoo-in for the 3rd Congressional District. Kinda smells like what the Dems did to Blanco, doesn't it?

Just my opinion,

MeMe

By the way, I am not afraid to vote across party lines - I've done it many times before.
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 29, 2010 - 11:48 pm
" Resident " --

Melancon will vote for whoever the democrats pick to lead the Senate, which would be harry reid or chuck schumer.

Melancon voted for the stimulus.

Melancon will not vote to repeal, or defund, Obamacare. If he would, he would have said it by now.

I don't think Melancon would vote to keep the bush tax cuts. I seriously can't afford to send another $500 a month to Washington.

I don't think Melancon gives two shits about cutting the federal budget.

I think Melancon's character is even lower than Vitters because I think that it is much more pathetic to cry in committee meetings, and on CSPAN, than it is to sleep with a hooker.

Finally, I think Vitter MIGHT, just MIGHT, get in line with people I really like next year, like Jim Demint, Paul Ryan, and Rand Paul. Melancon, I'm pretty sure, would do nothing to help them, and might even actively undermine them.




...
written by Hamburger Helper , October 30, 2010 - 01:06 am
written by Robin May

Hey you ever heard of the word "hypocrite"? That is exactly what Vitter is. Yes Clinton and John Edwards had extramarital affairs. And yes it bothered Democrats. But these 2 politicians didn't claim to be "family values" candidates like Vitter is.
-----------------------

Not really, Clinton and Edwards never stressed the point but the image was family values. Clinton with his Bible, off to Church, and Edwards with his wife and children. Robin, are you really that naive?
...
written by Sensible Politics , October 30, 2010 - 07:02 pm
I do not want to give millionaires and billionaires a tax cut. Experts say that this would amount to more than one hundred thousand dollars tax break each for these rich people.

Obamacare, as you call it, means that people will not be subject to the insurance companies being able to drop your coverage when you get sick. It is worth noting that single white women with 2 kids or more constitute the majority of citizens who will benefit from this health insurance reform.

Once I hear people call this reform "Obamacare", I automatically know that I am hearing a racist speak. Those same racist said the same thing about welfare, and true to form they (the racist)did not consider the facts which is that the majority of welfare recepients were white people.

Finally, mention jim demint in any honest debate and you loose the debate.
...
written by NOTHING Sensible about Politics , October 31, 2010 - 03:18 am


Less than 10% of white people are "on welfare". About a THIRD of black people are "on welfare". And if Obamacare is racist, then in the 90's when they called it Hillarycare, what was that? Sexist? Reaganomics in the 80's, that was anti-irish, anglophobic?


...
written by Sensible Politics , October 31, 2010 - 01:49 pm
Yes, sexist.
...
written by Resident , November 01, 2010 - 11:45 am
And Vitter wouldn't vote for whomever the Republicans pick for their leader? What's the difference? Mitch McConnell is a schmuck just like Reid, probably worse.

A stimulus bill would have been passed by either party in the wake of the recession. It's Keynesian economics - government spending in the place of lowered consumer spending - and both parties (and the Fed) are obsessed with it. The Rep's stimulus would have been different, but no less expensive. Maybe they would have invaded another country like in 2003.

I don't think saying Obamacare is racist, but I think it's one of those meaningless cliches. The health care overhaul is very similar to what the Republicans proposed in the 90's. It's a giveaway to industry and Vitter does not oppose giving our money to the corporate overlords.

I think Melancon would vote to keep most of the tax cuts and allow the highest bracket to go back to what it was under Clinton (when we prospered, btw). How can Vitter claim to be concerned about deficits but vote for what amounts to hundreds of billions in deficit?

"I don't think Melancon gives two shits about cutting the federal budget."
Neither does Vitter.

"I think Melancon's character is even lower than Vitters because I think that it is much more pathetic to cry in committee meetings, and on CSPAN, than it is to sleep with a hooker."
Wow, really? You forgot to say he's married.
...
written by Sensible Politics , November 01, 2010 - 02:10 pm
Melancon teared up because he understood that Louisiana is being devastated again and republicans didn't care and went to the extreme apologizing to bp.

The stimulus was and still is the right thing to do. Look at all of the republican who are sending letters to OMB requesting it saying that it will create jobs in their district, google it, including Jindal.
Republican would do stimulus except they would give it all to rich people.

What normal person would not want their kid covered until age 26. What normal person would not want their insurance co to cover all of their medical until death. What normal person would not want their pre-existing condition to be covered. What normal person would not want credit card companies to raise their interest rate. What normal person would not want wall street regulation, and workplace safety regulation.

I'll tell you what person would not want all this-racist!

All of this noise in the electorate is drummed up by large corporations and their tea party racist.
...
written by Limited Liability , November 01, 2010 - 02:25 pm
written by Sensible Politics

"What normal person would not want their kid covered until age 26.
What normal person would not want their insurance co to cover all of their medical until death.
What normal person would not want their pre-existing condition to be covered.
What normal person would not want credit card companies to raise their interest rate.
What normal person would not want wall street regulation, and workplace safety regulation."
-----------------------

If you mean by normal, someone who takes personal responsibility for himself and does not want government control of his life, then that's me.

...
written by Sensible Politics , November 01, 2010 - 02:35 pm
If you mean by normal, someone who takes personal responsibility for himself and does not want government control of his life, then that's me.

That's the right wing fringe talking point. My intention was to elicit comments from normal people.



...
written by ragin_cajun , November 01, 2010 - 04:04 pm
Resident --

Look, you asked me, I told you. I have repeatedly explained multiple times here, using examples from their voting records, why I think Vitter is a better candidate than Melancon. The two men have voted differently. I'm sorry you don't like that, or can't see that. You can always vote for who you choose--if you even do.

But I reject your idea that one is the same as the other, that there is no difference in philosophies between the two men, and the two political parties, so it doesn't matter how we vote.

These men have two VERY different philosophies, and it animates their thinking and in turn how they vote in Washington. I won't let you just gloss over that.




...
written by Limited Liability , November 01, 2010 - 05:39 pm
Sensible Politics writes "My intention was to elicit comments from normal people."
---------------------------

Thank goodness we have people like who you to decide on what is normal. That way we do not have to think anymore. From now on I will listen only the Newspeak as defined by Mr or Ms Sensible Politics.



...
written by Sensible Politics , November 01, 2010 - 05:59 pm
written by Limited Liability ---------------------------

Thank goodness we have people like who you to decide on what is normal. That way we do not have to think anymore. From now on I will listen only the Newspeak as defined by Mr or Ms Sensible Politics.

Sheesh, I was giving up on you right wingnuts. Now, march down to the polls tomorrow and vote the democratic ticket. Carry mom and dad to the poll with you and show them the light. Poor little things, they're scared to death after hearing Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, Sharon Angle and company planning to interfere with their SS.

Be sure and contact me for advice on future elections. Glad to help out.




...
written by Limited Liability , November 02, 2010 - 01:55 pm
written by Sensible Politics

Be sure and contact me for advice on future elections. Glad to help out.
---------------------------

Sieg Heil Baby! Will do! All power the National Socialist Democratic Party! Although I am afraid the out come is not in our stars.
...
written by Sensible Politics , November 02, 2010 - 02:53 pm
Instead of Sieg Heil, try "right on baby".
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it