News -> INDReporter TUE, NOV 2 10:15AM by Walter Pierce

Judicial committee weighs in on complaints

[Editor’s Note: This story has been modified since its publication following the receipt of additional information. The original story follows this updated version.]

The complaining — and campaigning — ends today.

Louisiana’s Judicial Campaign Oversight Committee has rendered decisions on complaints filed by both candidates in Tuesday’s runoff for a seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeal, rejecting complaints lodged by both District Judge Phyllis Montgomery Keaty’s and attorney Buzz Durio. The committee did, however, negotiate a settlement between the two over a second complaint filed by Durio against Keaty.

In a letter dated Monday, Nov. 1, John B. Scofield, vice-chair of the committee, informs Keaty that the committee “has voted to dismiss the complaint, as the Committee did not find clear and convincing evidence that [Durio] violated Canon 7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.” On Friday, Oct. 29, citing the same lack of evidence, Scofield informs Durio that his complaint against Keaty has also been dismissed.

Keaty contacted the committee last week, accusing the Durio campaign of using “blatantly false” figures in a series of print ads and urging the committee to compel Durio “to immediately discontinue these misleading advertisements ...” At issue were ads in which the Durio campaign claimed that more than half of Keaty’s rulings that were appealed to the Third Circuit were reversed. Prior to that, the Durio campaign accused Keaty of misleading the public in claiming she has “heard” 11,000 cases during her 12-year tenure on the bench. Each of those complaints was dismissed.

Durio also accused Keaty of suggesting in advertisements that she has “20 years of judicial experience.” The committee negotiated an informal resolution between the campaigns, with Keaty agreeing “to qualify all statements of my 20 years judicial experience by noting, as I have tried to do throughout my campaign that 12 of those years have been spent as a Judge and 8 of those were spent as a Judicial Law Clerk.”

———————————————————————————

ORIGINAL VERSION:

Louisiana’s Judicial Campaign Oversight Committee has rejected District Judge Phyllis Montgomery Keaty’s complaint against attorney Buzz Durio, her competitor in Tuesday’s runoff for a seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeal.

In a letter dated Monday, Nov. 1, John B. Scofield, vice-chair of the committee, informs Keaty that the committee “has voted to dismiss the complaint, as the Committee did not find clear and convincing evidence that [Durio] violated Canon 7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.”

Keaty contacted the committee last week, accusing the Durio campaign of using “blatantly false” figures in a series of print ads and urging the committee to compel Durio “to immediately discontinue these misleading advertisements ...” At issue were ads in which the Durio campaign claimed that more than half of Keaty’s rulings that were appealed to the Third Circuit were reversed.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (7)add
...
written by Cajunhiker , November 02, 2010 - 04:03 pm
Well, a little fact checking anyone.
Is this true or false?
Have more than half of Keaty's rulings on appeal to the 3rd Circuit been reversed?
Exactly what percentage actually have been reversed if this is in dispute by Keaty's campaign?
...
written by yesidoknow , November 02, 2010 - 04:52 pm
Really makes me want to run out and vote. NOT!
...
written by Keaty is the winner , November 02, 2010 - 05:04 pm
None of it matters - keaty is gonna be the winner. And I wonder what happens now when durio has to appeal cases to her.....LOLOLOL OH Well.
...
written by Truthseeker , November 02, 2010 - 05:04 pm
Do an on-line search through Westlaw or Lexis and you will see many cases in which she was reversed. She is a very nice lady, but she has never been a "real" lawyer.
...
written by Karl , November 02, 2010 - 06:18 pm
Funny how Durio files a complaint a week before the election about something Judge Keaty has said for a year. Perhaps a bit of desperation? But I guess if you're not going to win an election the best a trial lawyer can do is try to litigate it.
...
written by be told , November 03, 2010 - 04:51 am
Keaty wins, but as a Lafayette voter, I am disappointed in the way she handle the last week of the campaign. Her mudslinging was very unprofessional, especially coming from a Judge representing our community.
...
written by Solutionor , November 04, 2010 - 02:43 pm
In politics the QUEENS RULES do not apply, anytime the high stakes of the greenback perks which is the prize an office brings with the position, protocol be damn. What she has proven, is that she will be a FIRST CLASS LOWLIFE POLITICIAN . But she is a woman.... and all the skirts in town voted for the couillion poster child.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it