News -> INDReporter TUE, DEC 21 6:46PM by Hope Rurik

First live oak felled on UL campus Tuesday

UL_Tree
                                                          Photos by Hope Rurik

Despite the diligence of concerned students, the first oak of a possible six fell today as a casualty of UL Lafayette’s renovation plans.

In response, students and community members gathered at the site at 5 p.m. to light candles and share their hopes for a more conscientious community.

The tree sat at the edge of the Denbo Hall dormitory parking lot, and was one of the trees that the administration had hoped to save.

“They were going to try to move it,” says Lindy Muse, a UL student, “obviously they couldn’t.”

UL_tree_student
UL student Lindy Muse participates in a candlelight
gathering at the site on campus where a live oak was
felled.

However, Muse and with fellow students Adam Constantin and Jacob Delahoussaye say there is a strong possibility that the trees surrounding the Denbo/Bancroft dormitories (two remaining oaks and one sycamore) will be the last to fall. According to the three students and Society for Peace, Environment, Action, and Knowledge members, the three other trees that were threatened will either be spared through redesign efforts or moved.

Carl Cousson, a concerned member of the community, says he doesn’t think this will be the last time something like this will happen.

“With the amount of construction that’s going to happen,” he says, “this will be repeated.”


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (19)add
...
written by The Original Northsidian , December 22, 2010 - 12:54 am
The only thing the current administration at ULL (there is no such thing as UL) is worried about is this. MAINTAINING THEIR OVERPAID SALARIES!!!!!!!!!! Tell me something, where did this UL name originate anyway? This is typical small town B.S. And all the while the administration smiles on the way to the bank while calculating their future pension benefits. They don't give a shit about trees. What is it that ya'll don't understand!!
...
written by MIchelle Hopkins , December 22, 2010 - 02:29 am
I am ill...this actually makes me sick of my stomach! Mr. Cousson is correct, this will be reapeated. And this is progress??? Wow!
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 22, 2010 - 02:13 pm
Of course there is such a thing as UL. The University of Lafayette...the university has every right to leave off the "at Lafayette" designation, as does UNO (officially LSUNO) and the big school in Baton Rouge - LSU&A&MC...
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 22, 2010 - 02:24 pm
The UL name originated in the legislature, and the university has every right to leave off the "at Lafayette" designation, as do hundreds of universities across the country, and even here in Louisiana - like the big school in Baton Rouge, LSU&A&MC.
...
written by Huh? , December 22, 2010 - 02:31 pm
Sean, then so could UL-Monroe. Are you ok with two UL's?

Doesn't really matter, because the rest of the country thinks UL is the University of Louisville.

...
written by Linda Larkan , December 22, 2010 - 02:37 pm
Actually, I worked at the university shortly after the name change and remember a memo that Dr. Authement sent all employees. In it, he specifically instructed us to never use the phrase ULL. The only acceptable abbreviation was UL Lafayette. Of course, the general public never got the memo, so ULL it is!
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 22, 2010 - 03:46 pm
If Monroe wants to brand themselves as UL then that's their business...they choose not to...
...
written by The Original Northsidian , December 23, 2010 - 12:31 am
Sean, you have drank the kool-aid!!

Huh? You are correct, but you know people like Sean know how to SPIN!

Linda Larkan, you are also correct.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS UL SEAN!!!! IT IS UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE. WHAT'S UP, YA'LL ASHAMED OF LAFAYETTE?
...
written by northsidian shotgun , December 23, 2010 - 04:16 am
NAW ! They're not ashamed of " The University of Lafayette at Louisiana. " It could have been called "Authement Leaves, thats what Danny Boy and the sleazy lawyer had agreed to call the horse farm to sweeten the deal, so Authement would put it to the Lafayette Taxpayers. And give them a K-Mart Bluelight Special.
...
written by Huh? , December 23, 2010 - 12:54 pm
Sean, that's actually incorrect. In the late 90's the legislature approved the possibility of a University being called "University of Louisiana at XXX", but only if at least two universities in the UL system went along with the name change. USL always intended to call themselves UL, and they were able to convince the political appointee/university president at NLU Lawson Swearingen that the name change was a good idea. The law states that neither university can call themselves UL or University of Louisiana. So no, Monroe cannot brand themselves at UL, and neither can Lafayette.

The interesting thing is that ULL continually blames the reason that they cannot call themselves UL on the LSU contingency, saying that LSU blocked their opportunity, lied, cheated, stole, etc... However, that's not much different from what USL did to NLU. "Hey NLU, let's both change our names to UL@. We promise not to call ourselves UL!" Then the very second the law is changed, you have locals threatening the newspaper if they don't refer to ULL as UL in every article. Fans cried loudly to ESPN when the Cajuns made the CWS. And you rarely see the word "Lafayette" any more on campus. Way more effort has been put into the name change than towards improving anything substantial.

Fact is, this argument is purely about emotion and ego. It's a sports fan's argument, and nothing else. Both universities suffer from lack of funding. Both have a few top-notch programs and not much else. Both have mediocre athletics with some past success in smaller divisions and lesser sports. Neither do anything very substantial related to commercializing research. Both have new dormitories and have made some strides in beautifying the campus. ULL happens to be in a bigger market than ULM, so their student population is bigger.

In the grand scheme of things, the name argument is so irrelevant, it's ridiculous. The name change changes nothing.
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 23, 2010 - 03:46 pm
While your details are correct, UL can brand themselves anything they choose. You appreantly don't know or understand "branding" - it's not simly about an official name. They can ask the community and the local media to refer to them as UL all they want - just as LSU has branded itself "LSU" rather than Louisiana State or their real name, LSU&A&MC...using your arguemt, why did you refer to Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College by that abbreviation?

My point is why do haters care what the university calls itself unofficially? And the name change does indeed have an impact on national recognition - removing the regional moniker was always the intent and was and still is a good idea.

And not only is the student body larger in Lafayette but so are the number of degree programs and national recognition for those programs. Am I biased as an alum? To quote Palin the Idiot, "you betcha!"
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 23, 2010 - 03:48 pm
To The Original Northsidian - there is also no such thing as LSU...
...
written by Huh? , December 23, 2010 - 04:12 pm
Sean, the law says they can't brand themselves as UL. Period.

By the way, who is more well known - UCLA or the University of Maine? I'd say the one with the locational tag is more well known. It's irrelevant.
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 23, 2010 - 07:53 pm
If it's irrelevant than who cares? If it's irrelevant, then why all the hate? The University is doing the right thing in wanting to be called UL - go Louisiana's Ragin' Cajuns! And speaking of irrelevant, how about comparison of a university in the second largest market to one in one of the smallest...
...
written by Sean Trcalek , December 23, 2010 - 10:36 pm
MOST IMPORTANTLY - Merry Christmas to all!
...
written by The Original Northsidian , December 23, 2010 - 11:00 pm
Sean, it's not hate my boy it's the LAW. What don't you yahoos understand about that. You want a University in a one horse town to be nationally recognized. But, you evidently are ashamed that it is in Lafayette? Why would you not be proud to say University of Louisiana at Lafayette? And also when ULL plays ULM why does the 4.5 page local newspaper say UL defeated by the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Or, sometimes they say ULM. Give me a break dude, and go suck up to your fellow dreamers and have a MJ (that's a mint julep!!) hamc (and that means, have a merry Christmas!) asttbse (and that means stop trying to bullshit everyone!!
...
written by stu , December 24, 2010 - 01:40 am
I, for one, am thrilled that this first tree is down and look forward to the next three that must go. UL has promised to plant multiple oaks for every one felled, and has made efforts to save the trees that it could. UL's oaks are a treasure for the university and the community, but UL is a university, not an arboretum. If three mature live oak trees must be cut down so that UL can add thousands of dormitory beds, then UL should do what actually furthers its own mission.

Dr. Savoie, tear down those trees!

Oh, and the idea that the removal of an oak tree, even three oak trees, would provoke a candle-light vigil, is so absurd that I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen the picture.
...
written by The Original Northsidian , December 26, 2010 - 08:29 pm
The tree deal is a smoke screen anyway! They don't want anyone to focus on the high paid administrators and their obscene future pension benefits! All while they cut faculty pay, and increase tuition on the already over charged students! Bend over Louisiana taxpayers.
...
written by The Dude , January 06, 2011 - 06:59 pm
Its all jindals fault
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it