News -> INDReporter THU, DEC 30 10:06AM by Jeremy Alford

Congress sends food safety bill to Obama

President Barack Obama is expected to endorse legislation backed by the domestic shrimp industry and others that would give the government more power than ever to establish and enforce food safety standards. Massive recalls, like the egg-driven salmonella outbreak that sickened more than 1,700 people this fall, helped push the bill past the finish line during Congress’ final days.
The House and Senate put the finishing touches on the Food Safety Modernization Act last week and sent it to Obama for final consideration Wednesday. “With recent outbreaks of food-borne illness from common foods such as spinach, tomatoes, peanut butter, and cookie dough, the urgency of addressing this challenge could not be greater,” says House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat.

While the bill, which empowers the Food and Drug Administration, can be interpreted as a last-minute victory for a Democrat-controlled Congress, both of Louisiana’s senators got behind the effort with yea votes.

It was a different story in the House, where the state’s only outgoing members — Reps. Joseph Cao, R-New Orleans, and Charlie Melancon, D-Napoleonville — missed the vote altogether. Melancon has represented the Acadiana region since 2005 and is leaving as Republicans prepare to take control of the lower chamber.

The rest of Louisiana’s congressional delegation voted against the food safety bill, including Reps. Rodney Alexander, R-Quitman; Charles Boustany, R-Lafayette; Bill Cassidy, R-Baton Rouge; and John Fleming, R-Shreveport.

Conservatives largely opposed the bill with accusations of overreaching — it gives the FDA authority to issue mandatory recalls, increase inspections and utilize new investigation techniques. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative-leaning think-tank, devalued the bill completely in a recent study, opining, “Americans do not want and cannot afford yet more unnecessary regulation and expansion of government. This proposal constitutes a costly and ineffective answer to a manufactured crisis.”

But closer to home, there are plenty of boosters. For instance, the Southern Shrimp Alliance has labeled the bill a “major step towards improving the Food and Drug Administration’s practices with respect to imported seafood.”

John Williams, executive director of the SSA, says the bill will allow state and local officials to act as an arm of the federal government to increase inspection and enforce safe seafood standards. It also includes new requirements for foreign food safety equivalence, foreign facility testing and increased penalties for violations. Overall, Williams says, it would “protect consumers and help level the playing field for U.S. shrimpers.”

Vitter negotiated most of the shrimp-related provisions in the bill pending Obama’s signature, based on another measure he had authored earlier in the current term. Vitter says he also included language to prohibit “port shopping,” which is a tactic foreign seafood producers use to find ports with loose safety requirements to sell seafood that would otherwise be rejected. It further requires that foreign importers follow “equivalence” standards to ensure that food safety processes meet FDA requirements.

Landrieu, meanwhile, unsuccessfully fought to tack on a massive amendment that would have forced the FDA to increase its testing of imported shrimp from less than 2 percent to 20 percent by 2015, among other requirements. But she did have a role in securing another rider that would impact yet one more seafood staple: The bill calls on the FDA to conduct public health and cost assessments before issuing any new regulations affecting the processing and consumption of raw oysters.

When the bill passed the Senate earlier this month, it likewise won praise from Louisiana Agriculture and Forestry Commissioner Mike Strain, who called it a “major advance towards safeguarding the nation’s food supply.” He said farmers and other agriculture interests would benefit from several provisions in the bill, including:

* Expanding the food recall authority of the FDA
* Establishing science-based minimum standards for safe production and harvesting of specific types of fresh fruits and vegetables
* Allocating additional funding for facility inspections and food imported into the United States based on their risk profiles and increases inspections of all facilities
* Requiring mandatory testing by federal laboratories or accredited non-federal laboratories
* Improving traceability of fresh fruits and vegetables in the event of a food-borne illness outbreak
* Setting up a pilot program to explore and evaluate methods for rapidly and effectively tracing processed foods to identify the source of an outbreak
* Establishing training and education programs for state, local, territorial and tribal food safety officials on regulatory responsibilities and polices
* Establishing stricter food safety controls on imported food
* Authorizing officials to refuse entry of imported food into the U.S. if permission to inspect the food facility is denied
* Determining if a foreign country can provide reasonable assurances that its food supply meets or exceeds U.S. food safety standards

“As much as I dislike additional red tape for farmers to navigate,” Strain says, “I believe these new measures will provide the framework to strengthen our food supply chain and prevent adulterated and contaminated food from entering the markets in the future.”

Obama is expected to take action on the bill in the coming days.

Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (8)add
...
written by Locked and Loaded , December 31, 2010 - 03:28 am
“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”
~Thomas Jefferson, 1781
...
written by northsidian shotgun , December 31, 2010 - 04:07 am
Is it true that Obama signed a Government contract with Hawaii, for twenty million PINEAPPLES and thirty million COCONUTS, to mix up some CUBA LIBRE'S and some WHITE RUSSIAN'S, for Michelle's Entourage from the EAST SIDE. Is this true ?
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , January 01, 2011 - 01:35 am
The main benefits here with the Food Safety Bill is that through the Mangager's Amendment and the 'Tester Amendment" sponsored by Sen. John Tester of Montana, local, small producers of agricultural products are going to be exempted from most of the reporting requirements that would be burdensome to the local, craft, organic, sustainable food producers. That is as it should be. Most of the food safety hazards in the past couple decades have been generated by the giant continental scale food producer conglomerates. Accordingly they will be properly regulated by FDA now instead of USDA, and hopefully staffing for inspection will go back up to historical levels that our ancestors in the early 20th century fought and died for so that we could have safe meat and produce to eat.

This is not a partisan issue, but a right to safe food issue. If the business of producing and selling food gets so big as to be impersonal and unaccountable, then we shouldn't have to rely on lawsuits for safety and compensation. It is the right role of the state to ensure food safety.
On the plus side, the more you know your local farmers, the more accountable and moral they will be. Most of these are goodly, hard working Christian folk that need our support.
Keep your dollars at home! Support your local farmer.
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , January 01, 2011 - 07:14 pm
written by Locked and Loaded , December 30, 2010
“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”
~Thomas Jefferson, 1781

Listen here, ragin cajun, there you go again quoting those old white guys from 300 years ago. Food safety has nothing to do with what people choose to eat. If you want to buy crawfish from china that is unregulated, use your freedom and purchase it.
...
written by Resident , January 03, 2011 - 01:17 pm
Thanks, Jason...at least someone knows what's really important. Thank goodness the Tester amendment was included. The food safety hazards are generated by huge industrial farm operations, as you said, which are a relatively recent thing. Our food system has been so homogenized and centralized in recent decades, and the government corporatocracy has promoted this through farm subsidies.

This bill almost was a major blow against the re-emergence of local foods and organic farming. Monsanto gave our Senator Vitter thousands of dollars to back the bill. Giant agribusiness backed the original bill because it would have put big burdens on the nascent local food movement; I bet they didn't count on Tester and a few good lawmakers who put the people ahead of the lobbyists.
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , January 03, 2011 - 04:57 pm
Score one for the american people. It is high time that we put some regs on the people that feed us. Sister Sarah, Rev Beck, Grand Klux Haily Barbour, ragin cajun, Northsidian, and their race hate base will no doubt claim that their freedom is being abridged and that tyranny is on the horizon, but at least they won't die from eating poision food from pigly wiggly.

IDIOTS!
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , January 03, 2011 - 11:14 pm
Lafayette Native, I think you've somewhat underframed the issue here. It's not so much local/state Board of Health oversight of the local grocery establishment that we all interact with regularly. By contrast it is the ten thousand acre produce farms, the CAFOs (Confined Animal Feeding Operations) and their associated under-regulated and animal waste runoff and further poor oversight in the slaughterhouses run by as few operators now as we have old-fashioned Broadcast Networks, which are the problem. The producers not the retailers are nationwide and at times transnational in scope.

Take note that I am asserting that the issue is not simply a failure of enforcement but also a failure to construct oversight rules in the past that has led to this problem. There is little doubt in my mind as to why additional legislation by the Congress was necessary to more explicitly spell out what the Executive Agencies should be doing to ensure our food is safe to eat and that production processes are not contaminating drinking water supplies and surface water supplies in the regions where production takes place.

Maybe everyone could go watch Babe 2, when Babe left Farmer Hoggett's pastoral acreage to arrive at the CAFO for reference, then check out either Food, Inc. or Fresh for more awareness on these issues.

Finally, I'd just add: This is Louisiana, almost everything and anything can grow here year round. It is ludicrous and cravenly wasteful that our perishable food is shipped across the continent for the convenience of the national-scale agribusiness and retail industries, thereby wasting precious fuel sources.

Last I read, State Departments of Agriculture are trying to encourage farmers to move back into "real" food production for the increased income unsubsidized crops especially those grown organically, can provide to farmers. Hopefully we'll see more of this and a proliferation of vendors at the Farmers Markets across Acadiana.
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , January 03, 2011 - 11:27 pm
I agree. However, I am a firm believer that the federal government and only the federal government should regulate the safety of our food.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it