The Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce is in damage-control mode, evidenced by a letter to the editor and series of articles and editorials published Sunday in The Daily Advertiser in which the chamber both defends the legislative scorecard it released in January while softening its stand on the failing grade handed out to state Sen. Mike Michot.
Chamber leadership emailed the same statement to The Independent on Sunday — the same day the articles and editorials appeared in The Advertiser. Conspicuously absent from that Advertiser coverage were any quotes from Michot, who acknowledged to The Ind last week that he did indeed meet with chamber leadership but declined their offer to make the letter to the editor a joint statement.
State Sen. Mike Michot, R-Lafayette
The senator, in the final furlong of his time in office — he is term limited and will be replaced by an election this fall — is still smarting from the failing grade he was given by the chamber on its scorecard. Our reading is that Michot is more angry than disappointed, as he — like many in the community — believes he has been a steady advocate of Lafayette’s business interests during his 16 years in the Legislature. (Michot’s failing grade stemmed more from his absence at four of the 12 votes on which senators were graded by the chamber — votes Michot says he missed while tending to other important business in his role as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. The chamber acknowledges in the letter reprinted below that it is reviewing how absences weigh into grades.) Michot maintains that the grades distributed by the chamber were counterproductive to the longtime goal of knitting a strong coalition of Acadiana lawmakers to work in unison for the business interests in the area.
Here’s the chamber’s letter:
In 2010, the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce took a bold step in its long history of representing the interest of business. That step, as recommended by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, was the issuance of a voting record of local elected officials. The voting record report is a resource for the Chamber’s newly formed political action committee.
However, the simple idea of reporting on voting records brings with it the inherent risk of appearing to disapprove of a candidate or candidates, or having the report record being interpreted incorrectly. The Chamber, in reporting on voting records, provides numerical scores and not letter scores.
Unfortunately, as in the case of Lafayette Senator Mike Michot, the reported voting record tallied absences from significant votes due to his demanding and important role as Chairman of the Finance Committee. Thus, the unintended consequences were that a proven friend of the chamber and community received a low numerical score, which mischaracterizes Senator Michot’s legislative contribution.
Recognizing that the voting record, which is based on actual votes, did not accurately account for a pro-business philosophy, or an entire body of work, the chamber will modify its initial protocol. The Chamber will continue to communicate its positions on behalf of its members, will continue to monitor lawmakers’ votes, and will continue to hold them accountable.
The goal is to enhance the critical business infrastructure and environment for small and large businesses. That end will be achieved through positive, collaborative spirit by the Chamber, the community at-large and our elected officials on all levels. For at the end of the day, it is not “us” against “them,” but simply and collectively, “US”.
The Chamber leadership met recently with Senator Michot. We will work side-by-side as we face a most challenging 2011 legislative session. With Senator Michot as Chairman of the powerful Finance Committee, and the balance of our talented delegation, Lafayette has an unprecedented opportunity for spectacular progress.
Flo Meadows, chairman of the board Jerry Greig, chairman-elect Rob Guidry, president
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
AUG 22 Blogger Robert Mann is writing about the so-called Edmonson Amendment in this post, and he's not a fan. If Bobby Jindal really does support a "gold standard" of ethics he would have done something - or even said something - and yet he has not, Mann says.
AUG 22 Crazy Crawfish is blogging about the (interesting) incident of the state Education Department's website being out of commission earlier this week. It was reported (with heavy implications) in two local media outlets, and Crawfish feels the stories would have been better had the reporters done a little investigation instead of just printing what they were told.
AUG 22 Blogger Tom Aswell has some advice for state troopers who plan on making any public comments or challenges to the Jindal administration: don't do it. He's telling the story of one trooper who dared to challenge Commander Mike Edmonson's buddy and paid the price for it.
AUG 22 Columnist Clancy DuBos is writing about the upcoming elections in this post on Gambit. The field for local and federal offices has its share of old guys, he tells us, although mostly he's talking about Edwin Edwards.
AUG 22 Columnist Jim Beam is talking about the Office of Group Benefits in this post; that's the office that handles the money collected from state employees to pay their benefits. The OGB reserve fund has been reduced by half in the last year, and the Jindal administration keeps saying that's a good thing - but that's like telling a kid that castor oil is good, Beam says.
AUG 22 Columnist James Gill is writing about dueling efforts over the killing of animals; on one side is a lady trying to avoid the euthanizing of stray cats and on the other is a camp of folk who feel that there are enough black bears in Louisiana for us to start killing them for fun.
AUG 22 One could assume that nobody (teachers included) likes it when politicians tell them how to do their job. So what do teachers think about Common Core? Blogger Michael Deshotels is examining some responses from teachers who were asked. (Spoiler alert: none of these comments will be used in a Common Core marketing campaign.)
AUG 22 This post on The Hill is commenting upon the latest round of "that candidate is the worst person in the world" ads that are running in Louisiana's Senate race. This round takes aim at Bill Cassidy, the physician/Congressman who is challenging Mary Landrieu, and lists all the votes he has cast that hurt veterans.
AUG 21 Tom Aswell is telling us about another "efficiency" contract the state has signed. This one is paying a consultant (i.e. someone with a briefcase from out of town) $140 an hour, plus tens of thousands in air fare. The agency on the receiving end of this tender care? The DMV. Well -- that's working great, then.
AUG 21 Columnist Stephanie Riegel is writing about the scandal that has rocked the LSU Alumni Association (to wit, the executive director's "girlfriend" also was his employee; when they "broke up" he started paying her, with alumni money, to keep her mouth shut). In particular, she's looking for some lessons to learn from the mishigas.
AUG 21 This post on The Lens brings us up to date on the ongoing process of populating the levee board that will decide if the so-called Big Oil lawsuit will move forward. Gov. Jindal has done his best to put the kibosh on the suit by removing pro-suit members, but the process of replacing them is not simple, Bob Marshall tells us.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly