News -> INDReporter MON, FEB 21 10:29AM by Heather Miller

Stimulus money ‘dried up’ in Lafayette Parish schools

An already tight budget for Lafayette Parish schools will bring even tougher funding decisions to Lafayette Parish School Board members when they begin budget workshops next month - as the last of the $16 million in federal stimulus money used by the school district over the past two years is gone.

According to a report by Marsha Sills published Monday in The Advocate, the School Board - already faced with an additional $6 million in contribution to the state’s retirement system during this year’s budget process - has relied on $7.5 million in Title I stimulus money and $8.5 million in stimulus education money to fund the district’s newest preschool classes and an extended learning program that offers additional tutoring and enrichment to students after school.  

But with the loss of the millions in federal stimulus dollars - and little optimism that the state will offer additional program money due to a BESE-approved freeze on school spending levels - the school system is looking into alternative funding sources while the School Board preps itself to make the ultimate decisions on which programs will continue receiving funding and whether any programs will be eliminated:

For the past two years, eight of the district’s 50 preschool classes have been funded by nearly $1.9 million in Title 1 stimulus funds. The additional funding made it possible for the district to expand its program to 3-year-olds.

The ... stimulus funds also paid for four of the dozen school sites that offered extended learning programs - after school enrichment and tutoring - and summer remediation for fourth- and eighth-graders who failted the LEAP test. LEAP remediation is a state requirement, but districts don’t receive additional funding to operate the sessions.
The report points out that last year, the school system entered its fiscal year with a $14 million deficit, which forced the School Board to streamline some programs and increase the student-teacher ratio. Those attempts, however, were not enough to make ends meet - and the board was forced to dip in to more than $5 million of its reserve fund.

Comments (21)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011 - 04:34 pm
Smells like a tax increase to me....:)
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , February 21, 2011 - 05:01 pm
This is an example of Obama's no child left behind. At least he funded it. Remember Bush did not fund NCLB.

Again, this is the difference between Democratic leadership and republican cut all programs but give the rich all of the money strategy.

Republican Trickle Gown Economics has proven to be a failure and a fraud.

Louisiana, especially Lafayette, you'd better get down to the polls and get the Democrats back in office.
...
written by Lagniappe , February 21, 2011 - 06:42 pm
Why did the school board use one-time funds to expand a program? Where did they think the money would come from to maintain the expanded program in year 2? Doesn't make much sense to me.
...
written by Facebook Me , February 21, 2011 - 06:53 pm
Take all the money from the rich, the middle class, and the poor, and then fund the teacher's retirement. Heck, they did in Wisconsin. Seems to be working OK up there.
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , February 21, 2011 - 07:21 pm
written by Facebook Me , February 21, 2011
Take all the money from the rich, the middle class, and the poor, and then fund the teacher's retirement

No, I say its high time for a little ECONOMIC PATRIOTISM. The rich has gotten more than their share under DICK AND BUSH and for 2 more years under OBAMA. They ruin the economy and now they need to fix it.

Union busting is going to blow up in their collective faces.

WORKERS OF THE WORLD. UNITE!
...
written by MollyBloom , February 21, 2011 - 07:22 pm
Of course it does, ragin_cajun! (God forbid we should actually have to pay for something . . .)
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011 - 07:27 pm
Native --

I don't understand your thinking here, buddy. Obama is president, and he's the one cutting this funding. The funding was stimulus money, and now it's going away. What does Bush have to do with this?

The article says " $7.5 million in Title I stimulus money and $8.5 million in stimulus education money "....so that's Obama's stimulus plan. I don't think this problem has anything to do with Bush, or Obama, or the federal government at all.

In fact, I don't think it's the school board's fault either. They got some money, the money went away, and now the programs have to go away....
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , February 21, 2011 - 07:39 pm
What it has to do with BUSH is simply that Obama tried to do something for the youth of this country. Bush created NCLB and then funded the war if Iraq instead of funding NCLB.

So, killing the children (4500+ dead in Iraq)took priority over NCLB and sending us into a near collapse of the economy to booth.

When the peasants rise up and grab their pitchforks and torches...

Now, ragin, remember I told you that the mid term was about abortion.

Let's see how many job creating bills jon boner has passed through the house of representative. UH, Lets see, lets see. UH! NONE
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011 - 09:01 pm
Now, native, remember I told YOU, that government doesn't create jobs, people do. Companies do. If you're waiting on a politician to create a job, you'll starve. That's why I don't go around attacking Obama because he didn't create any jobs--he can't and he damn well knows it. Boehner can't, either.

You're so worried about job creation, why don't you go start a company and pay some people to do the work. That's how jobs are created my friend.
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011 - 09:15 pm
"God forbid we should actually have to pay for something . . .) "

You say that like Lafayette has been starving the School Board of funding for years, now, and that's just not the case. The school board has a pretty big budget over there, millions of dollars a year. Every property owner in Lafayette parish chips in. I chip in, and my kids don't even go to public school.
...
written by lafla , February 21, 2011 - 09:22 pm
Does anyone reading this remember the retirees who come back to work a day later to a new job, new salary while drawing the school retirement?
Ridiculous programs like that should never have been started. It makes no sense. If you do not want to retire, keep working. Don't do this. No wonder there is no money with this kind of fiscal management.

These are huge numbers and these terms "Title I" "stimulus money," "$6 million to state retirement..." What does it mean?

Simplify it- tax dollars. All this money comes from you, the tax payer.

If you work in a convenience store, hotel, bank, restaurant, etc. these huge amounts of money come from you. You can stick any name on it you like, but at one time, that money belonged to you and other tax payers. Think about it.

So, with people losing homes, private sector salaries frozen, private sector lay-offs, Obama refusing to issue off-shore drilling permits and his all out assault on the oil & gas industry-from where will these dollars come in Louisiana?
Wind or Green Jobs in Louisiana? Probably not.

Government operates schools and does a lot of necessary stuff like protect us & put out fires, etc.
Government does not make a profit.
In order to operate everyone who does not work in government must make money pay taxes make a profit to operate of help our employers make a profit.

Are there too many school programs? Are all necessary? I cannot answer that.
I say if government makes a profit, let it expand like the private sector.
Until then, let it do what the private sector does.
I've been laid off and down sized or "right" sized. It hurts. It is frightening.

Rough economic conditions is what most American workers deal with all too frequently.
Welcome to our economic nightmare.



...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , February 21, 2011 - 10:03 pm
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011
Now, native, remember I told YOU, that government doesn't create jobs

So that business about giving tax breaks to the rich because they create jobs-you mean that's a republican hoax?

And that cut corporate tax rates crap that the republicans recite in their sleep-that's a hoax too?

So you agree with me that these so call conservatives are phony as the day is long.
...
written by The Original Northsidian , February 22, 2011 - 12:48 am
So does this mean the school board never prepared for this? But, I guess they didn't have to. The dumb asses (us) will vote for ANOTHER TAX INCREASE. You know a tax increase that Rob Guidry & Co. (Lafayette Chamber of Commerce) will certainly endorse!!!! NO MO TAXES!! The politicians need to pay attention to what happens when people have enough! Does the word Middle East ring a bell?
...
written by Dr.Northsidian Shotgun , February 22, 2011 - 12:57 am
Laf. Native You just don't get it, turn your "booth" upside down and you'll find where you saved your gum.
...
written by SENSIBLE POLITICS , February 22, 2011 - 01:24 am
written by lafla , February 21, 2011
Welcome to our economic nightmare.

You mean welcome to our economic nightmare that Bush and the republicans created.

Again, government can create jobs by proxie. In other words, government can create the conditions through which businesses can create jobs. This does not mean giving a bunch of rich people all of the money in the treasury via tax giveaway.

For example, alternative energy. Providing matching funding to investors for developing alt energy would spur millions of jobs.
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 22, 2011 - 01:35 am
Native -

There's no doubt, government regulation and taxes are a drag on business, IN THE AGGREGATE! In a very high tax, high regulation environment, like Ronald Reagan dealt with, cutting taxes and regulation can spur economic growth. But it's not automatic, and there's a limit. If you already have pretty low taxes, and light regulation, I don't think it's reasonable to expect a tax cut or minor deregulation to "create jobs". That's not exactly what Art Laffer, or Milton Friedman, said. I agree that Republicans/Conservatives go overboard with that.

Democrats/Liberals do it, too. They blindly parrot their own line of shit about government spending spurring economic growth. That's not exactly what Keynes said, either. There's limits to these economic phenomena.

I think that cutting taxes to nothing would not help much right now. I think that raising taxes and more government spending would not help much now. The truth is, the government is powerless to change the larger economic/social forces at play. Politicians that claim that they, or government, CAN change these things, are nothing but hustlers. Liberals and Conservatives BOTH do this, and they only do it to get elected and stay in the game. It's that simple.




...
written by BoFred , February 22, 2011 - 10:28 am
NO TAXES, NO TAXES, NOT TAXES

NOT FOR THE SCHOOL BOARD, NOT FOR THE SHERIFF, NOT FOR THE CITY OR THE PARISH, NOT FOR NEW & RICH NEIGHBORHOODS!!!

SO MUCH FOR NEW SCHOOL BOARD. LIVE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE. PERIOD. I GIVE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS A YEAR, THOUSANDS, & I DON'T WANT TO GIVE ANYMORE. I WILL ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST ANYONE WHO MENTIONS TAXING IN ANY MANOR, IN ANY NEIGHBORHOOD.

THE SCHOOL BOARD CAN CUT.
...
written by LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA , February 22, 2011 - 02:09 pm
written by ragin_cajun , February 21, 2011
There's no doubt, government regulation and taxes are a drag on business

Let me again urge my lil cousin ragin cajun, QUIT GETTING YOUR NEWS FROM THE PRETTY FOX FAKE NEWS MODELS.

On the question of Regulation: safe working conditions, medicine, food, highways, water-you name it. Every Financial segment needs to be regulated. Left up to me I'd regulate them greddy bastards right up to when they have intercourse with their wives-in the case of VITTER, with his whores.

Taxes: giving tax incentives to ship jobs overseas needs to stop. corporations need to be taxed at 40% across the board. Loopholes in the tax code s/b closed. Foreign investment needs to be taxed at 50%. Inheritence tax should start at 10 million and then 50%

This is the formula for a bountiful nation.

ECONOMIC PATRIOTISM, it's that simple.



...
written by ragin_cajun , February 22, 2011 - 02:41 pm
"This is the formula for a bountiful nation"

Your formula is Socialism, plain and simple. That level of government regulation would stop the free market cold, and bring this country to a point where we'd have to choose between Capitalism or a Command Economy. Free men will not form companies and work under the conditions you describe.

"Foreign Investment" is what creates markets for the things that America produces--Caterpillar Tractors, GM cars, Computers/servers/network gear/software, Energy services, industrial design and consulting, finance, etc. Tax that at 50%, and the world will ask a cheaper provider for these things--Germany, Britain, and in a few years perhaps China will be able to provide those things, too.

Taxing corporations at 40% is a tax increase on people who buy their services--corporations either pass along tax increases, or they go out of business. How would you like to see a 20% increase on every item you buy tomorrow? An increase to 40% of the corporate tax rate would mean at least that much increase in your weekly grocery bill, every nickel you spend for services, for lumber, cars, everything.

You just don't get it. Every nickel the government "taxes" comes out of an individual's pocket. Not some fictional creation like a "corporation", "banker", or "the rich". It comes from a real person who actually earned it and should rightfully keep it.

Try to have a reasonable conversation with you, and you pop off with crap like this. You can't stay on topic. You repeat the same slogans you've been chanting for months now whether they are germane to the conversation or not.
...
written by Resident , February 22, 2011 - 02:43 pm
Dang, ragin, I'm agreeing almost entirely with your posts. Well said. I see glimmers of sense in Native's posts, if only he can get past that manufactured "us/them" "Democrat/Republican" charade.

Only thing I'll say is that we do need sensible regulations for some things such as clean air and clean water, and ideally to protect the masses from investment fraud by the Wall St. mafia (although that obviously hasn't worked, especially after bipartisan repeal of the Glass-Steagil Act). But clean air and clean water are Public Assets that government has an obligation to protect.

Sorry for the conversation creep but it looks like that has already happened before I jumped in.
...
written by BoFred , February 23, 2011 - 10:49 am
I just heard that China demands the patents in order to sell goods there. Anyone know if that's true? Cause if that's true, the John Deere knock offs are just a coupla years away anyway. Maybe its not so good to do business w/ China..... I know I'm not enamoured with them.

I also know, I'm sorry for the students cause they're the ones who are suffering in sub standard schools, BUT I'M NOT SUPPORTING ANY NEW PROPERTY TAXES OR SALES TAXES None, not any time soon. The school board can learn to do with what they have as I have had to do. I have not had a raise in 9 yrs, so its getting tight. The internet may have to go soon & I will have to go to the library to comment on The Indep, but @ $7 a gal, I might have to get a bike. Long before I bike it, the school board will rot in heck - well one of us will be...
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it