News -> INDReporter MON, FEB 28 12:10PM by Heather Miller

Small group of locals: ‘Keep your Boehner off my body’

WebpicDonning glittery signs and Rosie the Riveter-esque head gear, more than a dozen pro-choice women — and a couple of men ­— took to the streets of Lafayette Saturday afternoon for a march against federal defunding of Planned Parenthood and other women’s health programs.

The Walk For Choice march, modeled after the large-scale protests seen across the country Saturday in cities like New York and other major metros, was in response to the passage of a U.S. House budget bill amendment that bars all federal funding to Planned Parenthood, a nonprofit that provides abortions, contraceptives, cancer screenings and other preventative health services to women.

In addition to the Planned Parenthood federal budget cuts, the House on Feb. 18 voted 240-185, mostly along party lines, to eliminate “Title X,” a budget provision that provides $317 million annually to family planning services nationwide, according to The New York Times:
[The] continuing resolution would cut by 10 percent the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, better known as WIC, which serves 9.6 million low-income women, new mothers, and infants each month, and has been linked in studies to higher birth weight and lower infant mortality.

“In Louisiana, we already have limited resources for women,” said Lauren Vice, a UL visual arts student and one of the protest coordinators. “We want to introduce to the town that this exists, a group of people in a conservative area who believe in choice. We want our autonomy protected. It’s ridiculous that we have to walk around town carrying glittery signs to ask for adequate health care. But I do like glitter.”

The group decided against widely publicizing the local march beforehand ­­— essentially because organizers weren’t sure of the kind of feedback they would face in their hometown.

“A lot of women who wanted to come couldn’t because they couldn’t find a baby sitter for their children,” Vice said. “They were afraid to bring their children because of the response [the protest] might bring.”

What started with a little more than 15 people grew slightly during their trek from Girard Park to downtown Parc Sans Souci, taking in two additional stragglers who joined the “Keep your Boehner off my body” signs along the way.

“Activism isn’t something we see here,” said Lauren Hebert, 27, an online student of library science at the University of Arizona. “It’s easy to feel isolated here.

ABC News reported on its website that Planned Parenthood already is banned from using federal dollars to fund abortions. The money the House voted to take away is used by Planned Parenthood for “family planning, birth control, medical and preventive services.”

The Planned Parenthood budget amendment is awaiting a vote in the Senate.

Read more on the Planned Parenthood funding cuts and other measures in the bill here.


Comments (26)add
...
written by RCajunrunner , February 28, 2011 - 05:23 pm
Here's the main thing:

Planned Parenthood, like Louisiana Family Forum, Family Research Council, etc., is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL Organization. None of those organizations should be funded with our public federal tax dollars.

With the current federal and state deficits, the U.S. Government and State of Louisiana should immediately end all appropriations of tax dollars to any NGO that has not been directly granted a government contract for its goods and services.

These groups already receive tax-exempt status. The taxpayers should not also be subsidizing their salaries and services. Tell them all to raise their own funding.
...
written by Risky Business , February 28, 2011 - 06:45 pm
From the photo, I don't think Boehner or anyone else is interested in their bodies.
...
written by tuggums , February 28, 2011 - 07:29 pm
I wish I knew this was happening, I would have joined. As a ULL student, I feel that there isn't enough activism for me to take part it. I would have gladly marched alongside these brave people.
...
written by Bubba Boudreaux , February 28, 2011 - 07:31 pm
By the looks of it most of the women in attendance need not fear an unwanted pregnancy.
...
written by Hailey , February 28, 2011 - 07:51 pm
That's really cute. Rather than discuss this like adults or moving on, we felt the need to make immature statements about people we don't know at all. I was one of the people lucky enough to have been in the presence of these women and it was an incredible experience.
...
written by Hailey , February 28, 2011 - 07:55 pm
and to tuggums, the women that started the walk were talking about doing more things like this. there's a page on facebook called walk for choice lafayette and they said they'll be posting about any future walks or other activities, if you'd like to join the next one.
...
written by Leah , February 28, 2011 - 07:56 pm
Tuggums OR ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED- there is a letter writing meeting for Planned Parenthood tonight! Send me an email if you're interested in attending and I'll give you the location.
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it (temporary email)

I'm proud to have been a member of this group! I hope that in the upcoming events we'll have more people join us. It's disappointing to see that the commenters here couldn't stick to the main issue and had to resort to body hate. The human body is a beautiful thing. Ignorance, however, is not.
...
written by RCajunrunner , February 28, 2011 - 08:11 pm
Hailey:

Why do you believe the taxpayers should subsidize the salaries and operations of Planned Parenthood, or any other NGO, especially considering they already receive tax-exempt status?
...
written by Hailey , February 28, 2011 - 08:19 pm
I think that there is a massive issue in our priorities at the moment. Would you rather money go towards providing contraceptives, cancer screenings and other healthcare services or so the army can sponsor a car in nascar?

I believe that until the government is willing to provide us with actual reasonably priced healthcare, they shouldn't cut funding to the few places that provide that for us.
...
written by holeinthedonut8 , March 01, 2011 - 01:49 am
Our society "subsidizes" NGO's for the same reason they give money and grants and huge gigantic public property to the oil companies. Good for business.

Simple..Get over the idea NGO somehow is less relevant and worthy than the other corporate sugartitsuckers you support.

Just saying

...
written by RCajunrunner , March 01, 2011 - 02:53 am
Then maybe we should remove tax-exempt status of these NGOs?

Just saying.

By the way, how much in taxes and funds to government do oil companies contribute into the coffers?
...
written by holeinthedonut8 , March 01, 2011 - 03:31 pm
EXXON paid ZERO in income tax last year

Just saying
...
written by holeinthedonut8 , March 01, 2011 - 03:39 pm
Citations for the comment about who pays taxes: http://www.ldsfreedomforum.com...8&p=180286

"- EXXON-MOBIL: The oil giant uses offshore subsidiaries in the Caribbean to avoid paying taxes in the United States. Although Exxon-Mobil paid $15 billion in taxes in 2009, not a penny of those taxes went to the American Treasury. This was the same year that the company overtook Wal-Mart in the Fortune 500. Meanwhile the total compensation of Exxon-Mobil’s CEO the same year was over $29,000,000."
...
written by RCajunrunner , March 01, 2011 - 04:37 pm
Using the Exxon-Mobil argument is absurd, ignorant at best.

First, smaller, independent E&P companies develop roughly 90% of the oil & gas wells in the U.S. Those are the oil & gas companies, like PetroQuest and Stone Energy in Lafayette, which drive our local economy and pay significant amounts of taxes.

Second, PolitFact easily dismantles the leftist propaganda of Exxon Mobil paying no taxes.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/dec/10/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-filibuster-exxon-mobil/

Also, multi-nationals like Exxon and GE classify their headquarters these days as an overseas location for tax purposes. But again, Exxon-Mobil does not represent the oil & gas industry here in the U.S.
...
written by James Melancon , March 01, 2011 - 06:19 pm
written by holeinthedonut8 "EXXON paid ZERO in income tax last year...Just saying"

---------------------

It’s worth noting that Exxon records $7.7 billion in other taxes in the U.S. (sales, property, excise, etc) and more than $50 billion of other taxes and duties paid overseas in 2009.

holeinthedonut8, your sources came from a 2009 article which failed to give the complete story. Nevertheless, what does Exxon have to do with Planned Parenthood?
...
written by LookSomeThings , March 01, 2011 - 06:45 pm
^ You forgot the "Just sayin"
...
written by Soop. , March 01, 2011 - 07:14 pm
Brave? Did I read that correctly? These women are brave? For buying posterboard, writing on it and then walking down the sidewalk? That is what qualifies as brave these days?

So what are the guys who scaled the white cliffs of Dover to free a continent from Hitler? They are just brave too?

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Sally , March 02, 2011 - 12:39 am
I think it is despicable and a low blow to reference these women's looks. What does fighting for what you believe in have to do with what you look like? Planned Parenthood is an essential establishment for many women and especially younger females. They offer many services for women's health, taking away their funding hurts their chance to be able to make sure girls and women without the means can take care of their bodies.
...
written by Hailey , March 02, 2011 - 05:22 am
What we did that day was rather brave. Going out into a mostly conservative community to protest something that most conservatives agree with? I'd call that rather brave, considering the sometimes physical reactions that pro-lifers tend to have.

Bravery comes in different forms. Someone referring to us as brave isn't discrediting any of the soliders of WWII and it's preposterous for you to even imply that.
...
written by northsidian shotgun , March 02, 2011 - 12:29 pm
Like I have said before. The poor get abortions, the rich send their daughters to visit "Taunt Mae Mae" for a few months in California. Give ma a frickin' break! Hypocrisy is alive and well in our little country town!!




...
written by Soop. , March 02, 2011 - 01:21 pm
Yes Hailey, I think you all should get the congressional medal of honor for your bravery ... for walking down the street. Despite what they tell you constantly on MSNBC, most conservatives are decent folks interested in honest debate. Did you really think there was a chance you would be harmed?

And as for the people complaining about the sexual comments ... take another look at the one main sign that is legible in the picture above ... by using sexual innuendo on their "brave" posters, these "brave" marchers were the ones that bravely invited these "brave" comments.

All the "brave" best,

Soop, a "brave" American
...
written by Hailey , March 02, 2011 - 06:51 pm
No one ever implied that we were on the same level as those who receive such honors. Again, bravery comes in many forms. One of the definitions of bravery is "Courage, also known as bravery, fortitude, will, and intrepidity, is the ability to confront fear, pain, risk/danger, uncertainty, or intimidation." When the march was being created, they said they were afraid that there wouldn't be a decent turn out. They were afraid that pro-lifers would come and scare away the few that may have showed up. I personally was afraid of what could happen if there were pro-lifers there and things got heated. Not to mention we probably would have been very outnumbered if they had decided to show up. But I sucked it up and went because I believe in this cause and I wanted to show my support.

And, just for the record, I don't watch MSNBC. My view on conservatives comes from living in this area for most of my life, being around my family (who are all conservative) and all of whom spent that day bashing me for being a "baby murderer".

I'm sure when they made the sign they didn't think "yeah! this is for those immature guys who have no valid argument so that they can still make a negative comment towards us!" This entire subject is about our body and our right to decide what to do with it.

Again, "Soop", we never attempted at invalidating the men/women that have and are fighting for our country. We never implied that we should be given medals for our bravery, because we know that what we did was small. But considering where we live and what we were walking for, it was HUGE and it did require a bit of bravery.
...
written by countmein , March 03, 2011 - 01:41 am
Way to go, Hailey. Keep up the good work! (Oh, and disregard the offensive immature comments.)
...
written by Christina Dunigan , March 03, 2011 - 03:17 pm
The "Walk for Choice" rallies were pretty pathetic nationwide. Planned Parenthood can't even seem to get the usual Rent a Rabble astroturfers to come back them anymore. People are just opposed to helping creeps pimp underage girls, especially with our tax dollars.
...
written by Hailey , March 03, 2011 - 07:55 pm
Like I said on facebook, Christina, you seem to have skewed the facts a bit.
Planned Parenthood had nothing to do with the underage sex scandal nonsense, and were the ones that reported it. sooo...
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , March 10, 2011 - 09:07 pm
Right on Ladies! We should have had 100,000 ladies marching though. There is a Republican assault on women rights---these ignorant Republicans wish to push our ladies back in whoredom and servitude by denying them access to proper health over their own bodies. Republican men are nasty brutes!

We should be leading the nation in these set of Rights, since we are a French polite and civil society!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it