News -> INDReporter TUE, MAR 1 12:18PM by Leslie Turk

Obama allows states to opt out of health care reform

President Barack Obama has apparently had a change of heart, Monday telling members of the National Governors Association, among whom was Gov. Bobby Jindal, that they can opt of the landmark health care reform law as soon as it goes into effect if they have a better plan.

Under the current law, states must wait until 2017 to obtain waivers, but Obama said he supported accelerating the date to 2014, as proposed by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Scott Brown, R-Mass.

The president, who has staunchly supported the law through court attacks and legislative efforts to repeal it, told the nation’s governors that he was willing to amend the measure to give states the ability to opt out of its most controversial requirements from the outset, including the requirement that most people buy insurance. But those states must have a better way to expand coverage without driving up health care costs, he said, and they will need to prove it. For example, states will have to demonstrate that insurance benefits would be as affordable and as comprehensive and that the same number of residents in their states would gain coverage.

On March 23 of last year, the day Obama signed the health care overhaul into law, 14 states, including Louisiana, filed legal challenges to its constitutionality.

Thirteen states claim the legislation places a fiscal burden on their cash-strapped budgets with an expansion of state-run Medicaid. Virginia filed its own suit, claiming that the “individual mandate” requiring people to buy health insurance exceeds Congress’ powers.

Joining Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell, then the only Democratic governor in the bunch (he has since switched), were Florida, Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Washington.

Obama also has backed removing a specific tax provision that both parties regard as onerous on business, The New York Times reported.



Comments (10)add
...
written by Gerald Bertholl , March 01, 2011 - 01:02 pm
Actually, there is some debate about whether he could stop the states due to a process called Nullification......
...
written by James Melancon , March 01, 2011 - 01:04 pm
Sounds like move to undermine the lawsuit. Nonetheless, I doubt it changes much.
...
written by queenbee , March 01, 2011 - 02:16 pm
I am disappointed at how Obama has allowed the Republican party to "punk" him. Can you please get a backbone, sir?
...
written by HARDHAT , March 01, 2011 - 09:15 pm
Queenbee, your president was born punked and i'm sure you have no "idea, what the word "PUNKED explains. Do mankind a "GREAT FAVOR". Go buy you a betty crocker baking receipe book.
...
written by Docpaul , March 02, 2011 - 04:30 am
Consider the the widely unpopular individual mandate (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/individual-mandate-in-health-care-reform-law-still-widely-unpopular-poll-117146333.html) and whether it is considered a penalty or a tax.
DOJ argues that it is a tax and therefore is constitutional through the use of commerce clause.

However, it appears that the six judges that have weighed in on this as of March 1 (3 for and 3 against) have stated in their opinions that they all agree that it is NOT a tax (http://www.redcounty.com/content/legal-fate-obamacare-may-boil-down-tax-issue). Most believe this will have a bearing if this gets to the Supreme Court and the individual mandate will be struck down as unconsitutional and thereby since there is not serverability from this and the entire law, Obamacare will be deemed nullified.
...
written by queenbee , March 02, 2011 - 09:36 am
Hardhat: I'm not quite sure why my response gave you such a h--d-on." Punked in the younger generation's vernacular means when someone lays down and doesn't fight anymore; to be weakened; non-responsive, "soft".....uh, what did you think it meant?
...
written by Resident , March 02, 2011 - 03:32 pm
Docpaul, fair analysis. It will be interesting to see what the corporate-friendly, federalist Supreme Court will say about this. "Obamacare" was favored by the insurance industry which lobbied for it (after all, the mandate would give them billions of dollars in windfall). So we have a bunch of SC justices who would like to stick it to Obama for the Republican pals, but these same justices are friends of the corporatocracy and lean heavily toward federal power over states' rights.
...
written by BoFred , March 03, 2011 - 05:22 am
I'm sure La will opt out, but I just got a notice my Blue Cross is going up a whopping $400 a yr, to $1200/mo for my family, and that is with a whopping deductible. No Rx card. I have to try to figure out a way to do this. I need to stay healthy for a few more years, till my kids are grown. I need to have them insured. I'd love the opportunity to try a federal insurance. I WOULD WELCOME THE COMPETITION in Louisiana, to see if some companies would lowere their risk. Since I haven't made a claim in years, I guess I have to pay more for the insurance industry to pay to make sure this federal health program doesn't take place.
...
written by BoFred , March 03, 2011 - 05:25 am
BTW, the sexist comment about getting a cookbook does not do you any justice. Surely you have the intellect to be able to express yourself better.
...
written by Doctor Ciano , March 03, 2011 - 08:28 am
Bo-fred, I will clue you, you dont count, you have'nt paid your dues, therefore your opinion is not revelant, but if you are bent on being cavalier, lay your coat on Queenbee's H--d-on, and join the "sexist fest. Read your casefile before you plea your case. Oh and have your Missus Queenbee change her alias, to Missus Bo-fred.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it