News -> INDReporter FRI, MAR 25 10:55AM by Walter Pierce

AG defends opinion pace

Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s office is defending itself against criticism that it has been slow to respond to requests for opinions submitted by Lafayette Consolidated Government’s legal department concerning questions about the Lafayette Charter Commission.

Communications Director Sharon Kleinpeter contacted The Ind last week to question a headline we used on our website, “Caldwell sticking it to Lafayette.” The article expressed frustration with the apparent slow pace with which the AG is fielding questions from LCG, which requested opinions from Caldwell as long ago as February of 2010. LCG chief counsel Mike Hebert, who took over the post from longtime LCG attorney Pat Ottinger earlier this year, told The Daily Advertiser last week that his department has been unable “to get an answer of any kind” since Ottinger began requesting opinions more than a year ago. Some members of the commission have also privately expressed frustration with Caldwell’s office.

Most recently — in late February — Hebert requested an opinion about whether the charter commission can place a multiple-choice ballot before voters. In that request Hebert also directed Caldwell’s office to disregard previous requests for opinions.

In an email exchange this week with Kleinpeter, the communications director defended the AG’s office:

Attorney General Caldwell would like to set the record straight on the issue of a timely opinion on what the Lafayette Charter Commission can recommend in a parish wide referendum on consolidated government.  Your headline could be misleading unless you understand the facts.

The current opinion request has been pending since March 2, 2011, a mere three weeks, not thirteen months. We have met with City-Parish officials in 2010 and 2011 to provide feedback on the City-Parish’s original proposal. After thorough research into the various issues presented by the City-Parish, we advised Lafayette representatives that they could not proceed to deconsolidate their present government in the manner proposed in their original request. As a result, the Lafayette attorneys withdrew their original requests and presented a revised request for opinion written on February 28, 2011 and received in our office on March 2, 2011. In fact the February 28, 2011 opinion request thanked the Attorney General’s office for assistance in reviewing the issues presented in previous requests.

As Attorney General Caldwell stated, “Issuing opinions is a responsibility we take very seriously. We will not provide legal opinions that do not meet legal parameters just to satisfy a requester’s wishes. However we do issue studied and accurate opinions based on the law.”

Deconsolidation has never been attempted in Louisiana and it is not a simple isolated process. Arriving at such a conclusion takes extensive legal research and consideration of the many entities involved in this scenario. As research was being conducted by our office, various ideas began emerging from the council and charter commission, and additional opinions were requested. Our office communicated with parish officials in 2010 and 2011 which resulted in the March 2, 2011 opinion request being submitted and withdrawing all previous requests.

Our office understands this unique situation and intends to provide the most accurate legal reasoning in its opinion, bearing in mind that this endeavor must also receive approval from the State Bond Commission and be precleared by the United States Department of Justice.
On Monday the City-Parish Council will vote on an introductory ordinance giving the commission an additional nine months to conduct its business and make a recommendation. If the intro ordinance fails the commission will have just two weeks to settle on what it puts before voters.

Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (4)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 25, 2011 - 11:19 am
The State AG's office is making a lot of sense. But, what they fail to understand is this. There is a very impatient "creative class" in Lafayette that wants what they want -- AND RIGHT NOW! They want deconsolidation, they want it to happen in an impossibly short time frame, and they don't want ANYBODY to think about it too much. If they don't get what they want, they will scream and yell and hurl insults and personal attacks regardless of what the facts are.

So, the best thing the AG's office can do is to just give whatever answer this loud minority wants to hear. A studied legal opinion is not required. If they insist on taking time to think about it, the AG's office will be attacked in print like every one else who is deemed to be an "opponent of progress", or doesn't "get it".
...
written by Walter Pierce , March 25, 2011 - 11:29 am
Um, yeah. Thanks for another dose of your low-grade negativity, ragin. The commission has a very limited window -- by law -- to conduct its work. If it receives no satisfactory answers from the AG before the window closes, well, tough titty huh?
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 25, 2011 - 04:21 pm
Nothing negative about it, Walter. That is my viewpoint. Isn't my viewpoint "equally as valid" as anyone else's? Why do you have to always make a value judgement about my experiences--my "reality"--like that? Why can't you just accept it for what it is, and perhaps try to see it from my side. I think that would be a more enlightened response from you.

Try to relax, man. And try to be more open to the diversity of ideas and values of those around you...:)
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , March 25, 2011 - 09:03 pm
Everyone has an opinion, and that makes the milk taste shitty.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it