News -> INDReporter WED, JUN 1 5:11PM by Walter Pierce

Annexation, infrastructure tensions erupt among mayors

A long-running, wide-ranging animus between the administrations in Lafayette and Broussard is red, tender and throbbing yet again, due this time to a refusal by Lafayette Consolidated Government to provide water to an unincorporated subdivision surrounded by the corporate limits of Broussard.

The animosity and mistrust between the administrations of Lafayette City-Parish President Joey Durel and Broussard Mayor Charles Langlinais have been well chronicled by local media, this newspaper included. The latest flare-up centers around Shenandoah Estates, a tidy subdivision of about 225 middle class homes near Bayou Tortue Road that is completely enveloped by the city of Broussard.

Shenandoah’s water service is supplied by Total Environmental Solutions Inc., a private, state-regulated utility company. Residents in the neighborhood have long complained about the service provided by TESI, and have lobbied Langlinais to annex them into city, which would make them eligible to receive clean, potable LUS water. (LUS, under former C-P President Walter Comeaux, entered into a long-term contract with Broussard nearly two decades ago to sell water at wholesale to the south Lafayette Parish city. LUS has contracts with other small municipalities and water works districts within Lafayette Parish as well, but does not supply water to unincorporated parts of the parish that are not covered by those water works districts. As a result, roughly 80 percent of Lafayette Parish receives LUS water. Shenandoah Estates does not.)

Langlinais recently sent a request to LCG asking that LUS enter into a third-party agreement with TESI to provide LUS water to Shenandoah. Citing the contractual agreement between LCG and Broussard for LUS water, which stipulates said water can only be supplied to the city limits of Broussard, Durel, no doubt relishing every moment of it, politely but firmly declined. His response, in part, reads:

It is not in the “best interest” of LCG ... to enter into a third-party wholesale water agreement for resale of wholesale water outside the corporate limits of another municipality in this circumstance.

Shenandoah Estates is completely surrounded by the corporate limits of Broussard and cannot be served or annexed by any other municipality. LCG has not entered into third-party wholesale water agreements under any other circumstances previously. LCG does not desire to set the precedent of allowing other municipal customers to resell City of Lafayette-produced wholesale water outside of their respective municipal boundaries to third-party resellers when the transaction does nothing to improve the reliability of Lafayette’s water system or to improve existing service to current customers of Lafayette.

These issues and concerns could be immediately eliminated by Broussard’s annexation of Shenandoah Estates. If that annexation were to occur, Section I (1) of the Wholesale Water Agreement clearly provides that Shenandoah Estates would automatically become part of the area to be served with LCG water.

Until such annexation, however, LCG declines to enter into a third-party agreement to allow the resale of LCG wholesale water to TESI for service to Shenandoah Estates Subdivision.

Regards,
L.J. “Joey” Durel Jr.

Langlinais, who has been accused of “cherry picking” his annexations by favoring commercial corridors that generate sales tax revenue while avoiding residential subdivisions — Broussard has no property tax, thus annexing subdivisions increases Broussard’s infrastructure and services burden while generating no additional revenue — fired off a snarky email to Durel on Wednesday in response to the LCG snub. Langlinais refers to LCG in the email as “LCOG” and copied C-P Councilman Don Bertrand, who represents Shenandoah. His response also references the annexation battles fought between Lafayette and Broussard, notably last year as the Ambassador South extension opened to new development. Read more about that here:

We have no desire or intention on incorporating Shenandoah and like everything with Durel/LCG, it’s a control issue…………

JOEY, HOW EASY is it to execute a three party agreement??? This BS about “its not in the best interest of LCOG or LUS” ,   let me tell you, its not in the BEST INTEREST of Broussard to provide Shenandoah water although we are willing to do so at an estimated cost of $80K to the citizens of Broussard!!  Further, by law you DO NOT HAVE TO BE CONTIGUOUS to incorporate Shenandoah…..just look at that BS you pulled on Caffery and Fabacher/Vieux Chenes….. was in the best interest of LCOG then?! AND DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that you opposed our legislation last year to provide water/sewer services to out lying areas!!!!  Flat out wrote a letter AND appeared before the legislative committees reviewing same……I suspect that I could get a copy of minutes in which your 4 or 5 people (and you) stating on the record your opposition!

DON Bertrand – you need to step up here and put your foot down!!  These are your constituents!  Not mine!

The Ind has learned through a source in Shenandoah Estates that Durel and Bertrand will meet with residents on June 13 at Lafayette City Hall to discuss their concerns.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (48)add
...
written by Realtor.... , June 01, 2011 - 08:00 pm
Seems there is no commission available to Langlinais on this transaction. Or is there?
...
written by The Original Northsidian , June 01, 2011 - 08:11 pm
I luv it when 2 dumb asses fight!!
...
written by Southsider , June 01, 2011 - 08:45 pm
Joey had better not cave in to that genius of a clown Langlinais. When is the long term contract going to end???? Once again, a PERFECT example of why our non-consolidated consolidated government isn't working. Screw Broussard. Let them fend for themselves.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 01, 2011 - 08:47 pm
How do they fight, do they pitty pat each others face,surely they do not kick each others candyass.....
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 01, 2011 - 08:54 pm
Durel used to have the largest volume of sales for his special family recipe of self formulated KY jelly in his birdseed shop............all clients were introduced to his jelly, especially all first time visitors to the bird seed store.
...
written by Concerned , June 01, 2011 - 11:08 pm
The problem with saying "Screw Broussard" is that the water is not for Broussard. It would be for an unincorp part of Lafayette Parish. Those people pay prop taxes to Lafayette and it is not allowed for them to connect to LUS system. The money would be paid for by the residents of that communitiy. Not a dime would be paid by tax payers. I know that both Broussard and TESI agreed to a deal to allow connection....at Shenandoah's expense. And according to Mr. Durel as stated on KPEL, "There is nothing we can do to help Shenandoah. The only people that can help them is the City of Broussard because they are surrounded on all side by Broussard City limits." Now it seems that everything changes when Broussard wants to help someone that they are not entiled to do.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 02, 2011 - 07:08 am
It seems that Joey is certainly a more effective writer than Charlie. And I can certainly see Joey's point.

But Charlie's positions are much more effective...even if they are poorly written. Joey's playing political games and getting revenge while Charlie's trying to figure out how to get people clean drinking water and stop them from complaining. Difference in people.

What is this legislation that Charlie's talking about? The legislation that Durel opposed?

As for Don Bertrand stepping up and putting his foot down...keep dreaming, Charlie.
...
written by realitycheck , June 02, 2011 - 07:33 am
Maybe Joey will just "redevelop" large tracts of lands under the land grab HB 531? It is not about blight; Lafayette does not have true "blight". We have scattered sites of neglect; usually where the city has sat on property. Under this bill, joey will be able to take large tracts of vacant land, farms and woodlands from Langlinais domain and award them to a select few developers. That is, of course, only if Langlinais is too tied up with this issue to realize that his municipality needs to opt out.......and in a hurry!
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 02, 2011 - 09:26 am
All of a sudden, the trio of " The GreenAmbulanceMan, The Half-BubbleOffSurveyor,and The erotically-donned YellowPagesSettleForADimeOnADollarLawyer, have become Joey's, favorite Developers.....
The most fitting scenario finale would be for Joey to win another term and before he reaches tenure, he's busted by the Feds..........
...
written by South of I-10 , June 02, 2011 - 09:48 am
@Ragin Cajun I was trying to remember, I think it had something to do with Langlinais building some sort of water/sewage station and effectively blocking either Lafayette or Youngsville from annexing in some way? Walter, do you know?

Either way, I feel terrible for these people. I find it difficult to take anything Langlinais says in good faith, and find it equally difficult to believe that he was doing this out of the goodness of his heart. He has not exactly been a team player. Of course, I am a biased city of Lafayette resident.
...
written by Southsider , June 02, 2011 - 10:16 am
Concerned wrote:
The problem with saying "Screw Broussard" is that the water is not for Broussard. It would be for an unincorp part of Lafayette Parish. Those people pay prop taxes to Lafayette and it is not allowed for them to connect to LUS system.

That is correct. The water is for the city of lafayette residents. LUS was built by the city, for the city, paid for by the city taxpayers. Walter Comeaux wholesales water to the outlying areas while the city taxpayers still pay for it. If Broussard wants city services, then pay city taxes. Its that simple. The residents of the subdivision should be breathing down Mr. Langlinais neck. He is the one that surrounded their subdivision with Broussard property. Lets put the shoe on the other foot. Would Broussard help out a city of lafayette subdivision? We all know the answer to that question.
...
written by Bow Tox , June 02, 2011 - 10:25 am
Reminds me of midget wrestling (Durel and Langlinais).
...
written by Pony up! , June 02, 2011 - 11:00 am
Ragin Cajun,
If Charlie wanted to truly give water to Shenandoah he would annex them. They have begged to be annexed for the last 5 years. LCG can't annex them because they are surrounded by Broussard. charlie won't annex them because it is "all about profit". He can WHOLESALE our water and make a profit. But if he annexes Shenandoah he loses money on road repairs.
Why should the city of Lafayette allow Broussard to make a profit on our water!!?

...
written by ragin_cajun , June 02, 2011 - 11:31 am
Pony up --

" by law you DO NOT HAVE TO BE CONTIGUOUS to incorporate Shenandoah " I take that to mean that Charlie is saying to Joey that Lafayette can annex Shenandoah anytime it wants. Is that how you read that?
...
written by Haven't Lost Hope , June 02, 2011 - 12:12 pm
In all fairness to both sides, the annexation issue is probably moot, in that Shenandoah Subdivision is split down the middle, with half the subdivision on TESI water and half on private wells. The 2 sides were built at different times. (Not sure how they let the developer get away with that!) The half on private wells are happy with their water and don't want annexation. The other half can't seem to get anything done about their water.

As for cherrypicking - that's an issue of State law from what I understand and the laws need to be changed, given our growing cities.

As for TESI - why are they not being held accountable for their deplorable water, and WHO CAN make them meet safe water standards? (They can say what they want. I've seen the water - at times worse than others - and there is no way it meets minimum standards!) Seems to me like that is where the answer lies......
...
written by Exhausted and Frustrated , June 02, 2011 - 12:37 pm
As a resident of Shenandoah and a lifetime resident of Lafayette Parish, let me clarify some misconceptions. On an ongoing, recurring basis, we live, bath and drink water that looks like it comes from a ditch - a 3rd world country. Our subdivision covenants (for the newer half of the subdivision) prevent us from drilling our own individual water wells. Shenandoah lies within an unincorporated area of the Parish - we are "bastard children" to all political divisions caught in a "peeing contest" between Lafayette and Broussard. We pay property tax to the parish (so Durel gets tax money from us), and we shop at the Broussard Walmart, Home Depot, etc (so Broussard gets the benefit of our sales tax revenue). Both Durel and Langlinais would rather spend time bashing each other and blaming each other for our plight rather than spend their productive time and energy serving the citizens. TESI is not being held accountable either. In the final analysis, neither LCG nor Broussard is "a business venture". Those political entities do not exist to earn a profit or look for the next commercial area to "suck up"; THEY EXIST TO SERVE THE CITIZENS. Our subdivision has been to the public service commissioner to complain about the TESI water, the town of Broussard, the Parish of Lafayette (everyone, please remember: Joey Durel is also the PARISH President). All parties involved are spending their time bickering and badgering each other with their political grudges rather than PERFORM THE JOBS THEY WERE ELECTED TO DO. Unforunately, Shenandoah is the victim of Durel's and Langlanais power struggle.

I don't suppose there's a lawyer/philanthopist out there who would be willing to help us with our plight?
...
written by Pony Up , June 02, 2011 - 12:56 pm
Ragin,
I have never seen it done. That is why you have seen Broussard buy property to stop Lafayette from annexing down Ambassador Caffery.
Let Lafayette try to annex something that is not contiguous and you will see Broussard file a suit faster than a blink of an eye.
Yet Broussard surrounds Shenandoah Esates and could provide water by their simple annexation, which is what the citizens of Shenandoah have been requesting for 5 years.
So the bigger question is WHY does Charlie refuse to do what his neighbors are asking of him?
And why would the city of Lafayette allow Broussard to make a profit on our water?
...
written by Shenandoah Resident , June 02, 2011 - 12:59 pm
What I love the most about all these comments from you retards who live in Lafayette, have no idea how bad the water is in our neighborhood. I know of 2 neighbors who have lost contracts when trying to sell their homes. It's affecting property value. I also have to bathe my infant in this crappy water. We also have to cook with it. My neighbors and I have said over and over again we have no problem paying for the water, and the cost to get it here. No my main gripe is with TESI, they shoule be embarrased because they are the ones who provide this water. They are too cheap to drill a well deeper to get to a cleaner water table. Secondly, Mayor Langlinais is being cheap by not annexing us. While I understand why, I do not agree with it. And finally, I 100% believe that Joey Durel is doing what he is doing out of spite. None of the parties involved are interested in their customers/residents needs. I am also 100% sure that every single one of you entitled Lafayette residents would complain at the top of your lungs on TV and in the Advertiser if you had the water we had. If you need an example, just look at how much crying you guys do over the Red Light Vans/Camera's and the intersection at Camilia and Johnston. Screw Broussard? No Screw you Lafayette.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 02, 2011 - 01:05 pm
Exhausted and Frustrated --

All very valid points. I empathize deeply with your frustration with Lafayette and Broussard government bodies and with TESI....and with the PSC. I agree that in light of your very real problems, the power struggle between Joey and Charlie seems childish indeed.
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 02, 2011 - 01:16 pm
Stop the presses, ragin_cajun just agreed with someone!
:0
...
written by Walter Pierce , June 02, 2011 - 01:37 pm
But seriously, ragin, with respect to your earlier question about the legislation Langlinais refers to in his email, I suspect he's referring to House Bill 870, which evidently died in the House Municipal & Parochial Affairs Committee during the 2010 regular session, although I don't recall any media reports (certainly none in this paper) on a fight between Lafayette and Broussard over the legislation.
You can read the bill at www.legis.state.la.us/billdata...did=687794
...
written by Southsider , June 02, 2011 - 02:05 pm
Exhausted and Frustrated wrote:

What I love the most about all these comments from you retards who live in Lafayette, have no idea how bad the water is in our neighborhood

At least we retards are smart enough to live withing a city limit to have clean water. My suggestion is file suit against Broussard AND Tesi. They are the ones screwing you, not the city of lafayette.

Screw Lafayette? Nice...tell that to Joey..see if he gives in to your wants.
...
written by Poogie , June 02, 2011 - 02:10 pm
Just remember residents in the town of Broussard and Shenandoah all vote in the Parish Presidents election and no one ran against him so eveyone must be happy with him. All of you need to stop talking bad about Joey.
...
written by Just wondering? , June 02, 2011 - 02:33 pm
Shenandoah resident,
When you moved into a rural area, did you expect to have city water?
While I appreciate your dilemma, I think your beef is with TESI.

...
written by T , June 02, 2011 - 03:04 pm
I do feel sorry for these people who were duped into moving into an unincorporated part of the parish. But, if you want to live in "the country" and not pay city taxes then you should not expect to have the same services as we do in the city. The rest of the parish has benefited for way too long and been spoiled. It's time for Broussard and the rest to fend for themselves, this story is a great example of why we need De-consolidation!
...
written by The Original Northsidian , June 02, 2011 - 04:11 pm
T, to you my man I say AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...
written by Exhausted and Frustrated , June 02, 2011 - 04:24 pm
Shenandoah is not a "rural" area. Honestly, when I purchased the home, I had no idea it was outside the city limits. I didn't "choose" to be unannexed. The south side of Lafayette Parish is like a jigsaw puzzle of incorporated and unincorporated areas, so "incorporation status" is not readily apparent. Yep, it was pretty stupid of me not to have known prior to purchase, but the typical homebuyer is more focused on things like termite inspections and homeowner inspections rather than city boundaries. After the Katrina fiasco (when half of New Orleans migrated here), folks like me were just desperate to get into a home - things were being snatched up before they even hit the market. So innocent victims like me jumped on a house and closed quickly - thankful that we found something. Now we are stuck in homes that we can't re-sell, because home inspectors and realtors have become "savvy" to our water problem. In the larger scheme of things, Lafayette Parish is consistently on the list of top progressive/growing parishes in the state and has been for years. Prior to the purchase of this home, I would have never DREAMED that such poor quality of water could exist in such a progressive parish (or even anywhere in the U.S. for that matter). Our water is often literally the color of iced tea, with lots of gritty sediment in it. Show some compassion, won't you - we are looking to be helped, not criticized.
...
written by Rinkelstein , June 02, 2011 - 05:08 pm
Charlie's chickens have come home to ROOST!!!! Broussard gets what they deserve for voting for their douche of a mayor! Time to deconsolidate. Then we will really hear ole Chucky crying!
...
written by Walter Pierce, Managing Editor , June 02, 2011 - 05:29 pm
Exhausted and Frustrated,
Please contact me if you would like to discuss your situation further: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
...
written by City resident , June 02, 2011 - 08:32 pm
Exhausted...

it seems there is also a legal impediment to your situation. According to the contract between the municipalities, the mayor of Lafayette has to act in the best interest of LUS.
When Joey Durel wears the hat of parish president, he owns no utility company, as LUS was bought and paid for (taxed) by the citizens of the city of Lafayette.
When he wears the hat of mayor of Lafayette, he has to answer to me and many other city residents who want to make sure that another "Walter Comeaux" mistake is not made.(as has been documented by this paper) and that the LUS water supply remains healthy for future generations. We don't want the contract tampered with and any new precedents set that would jeopardize LUS and the city.
It seems the legal and simple way to fix your problem is to be annexed by Broussard as the contract already allows for this.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 02, 2011 - 08:39 pm
Exhausted and Frustrated --

I guess a temporary solution for you would be filtration
...
written by Andy Hebert , June 02, 2011 - 09:01 pm
FYI:
The procedure to be annexed into a municipality is to present a signed petition to the governing authority (Council) requesting to be annexed.
The governing authority will draw up a Petition along with the legal boundaries of the area to be annexed.
It takes the signatures of 51% of the registered voters, 51% of the property owners and 25% of the assessed property values living in the geographical area signing a petition to be annexed.
This will be certified, I think, by the Parish Assessor and the Registrar of Voters.
After the Petition is Certified it is up to the Council to place it on the Council Agenda and vote to annex or not to annex.

The same procedure is used for de-annexation.

...
written by IMJacquemo , June 03, 2011 - 05:48 am
Due to Broussard's (Charlie Langlinais et al.) total lack of goodwill on dealing with so many other issues impacting both communities, why should Lafayette help? Sounds like it is time to negotiate. Charlie wants what he wants when he wants it...always at Lafayette's expense. Let him come with "hat in hand".
...
written by Compassionate One , June 03, 2011 - 07:47 am
Exhausted and Frustrated

What a terrible situation! I can totally understand why you call yourself Exhausted and Frustrated.

You would think that politicians who want to SERVE would come to your side. Unfortunately, this is an example of "not my problem" mentality. Where are the grownups here?

Langlanais-No
Durel-No
Bertrand-NO
PSC-No

Sorry and sad that no one in this great community of Acadiana seems to help you.
...
written by Compassionate One , June 03, 2011 - 07:49 am
Where are the grownups?
...
written by Just wondering? , June 03, 2011 - 09:24 am
Compassionate One,

I think the grown ups are waiting for the private owner TESI, who contracted with these people and made profits to step up and fulfill it's obligations of providing quality water. I see that you named everyone but the real culprit. Seems to me you have an agenda.
...
written by Compassionate One , June 03, 2011 - 11:54 am
Just wondering.....

I did name the PSC which oversees TESI. If TESI doesn't perform, these guys should come to this lady's aid.

I feel for her Catch 22 situation.

Yeah, where are the grownups?
...
written by Dekent , June 03, 2011 - 05:01 pm
Although I'm sure Joey is having a bigger laugh at Broussards situation than he would ever admit, he is doing the right thing, what is in the best interests of the city of Lafayette and LUS, which it owns. As he says, there are no 3rd party contracts for LUS water and he does not want to set that prescience, a very reasonable stance.

Now a city that ignores a large neighborhood it engulfs simply because they don't want to pay the infrastructure, THAT is something you should be enraged about, and even more so with the current water provider for failing to do it's job.
...
written by TESI-0 , June 04, 2011 - 09:35 am
Why doesn't someone file suit against TESI? They are doing the same thing in Youngsville. Make profits for years and won't fix the water. There r many ways they can fix the problem, but we just get excuses.
...
written by Concerned , June 04, 2011 - 10:00 pm
After reading all of this...I am truly amazed. This country can send aide to every foreign government....but when a community asks for someone to help to bring clean water to their homes....its like asking for the moon. "Come to Acadiana...we have great festivals....but we wont help out people with terrible water." This state and country can hand out "FEMA Trailors" to everyone at no cost, but when people are willing to actually pay for something its "UP YOURS!!!" from everyone (and yes "everyone" includes the kind citizens of Lafayette. The people of Shenandoah are not asking for a hand out....they are asking for help. The residents will pay for all water lines to them out of their pockets....not out of the pockets of the Broussard or Lafayette citizens. LUS has multiple 2 party agreements throughout the parish....so why can't Lafayette Parish ask to tie into the Broussard line and then Laf. can have a 2 party agreement between them and TESI??? If they wanted to do that, they could.

People ask why is it Lafayette's responsibility to help? Because Lafayette Parish is their representation. They are represented by Don Bertrand (Parish Rep). They are represented by the parish. The people were told by the parish (i.e. Joey Durel) that only Broussard could help them. What he should have said was that only Broussard could help ....but that he would block anything that Broussard is WILLING to do.

And TESI.....what a joke. Not even worth typing about.

As for as the Dept of Health???? Its a joke. TESI could sell ditch water to people as long as there is no bacteria or poisons in it. "Sorry it looks brown but there is nothing we can do about it. Have a nice day." Thanks state of Louisiana.

People around here get pissed off when someone needs clear water to drink and bath in.....but when LUS tells them not to water lawns due to drought ....HOW DARE THEY TELL ME I CANT PUT MY WATER ON MY GRASS. Wonderful priorities.

I bet if Shenandoah would be asking Lafayette Parish to us tax payers money build their kids a park so the could have a place to play...it would be no problem. But whatever you do, dont ask for water. When "Lafayette parish" went to once a week garbage pick-up, the city residents were in an up roar...."how dare you only pick up my garbage once a week!!!!!" Do you realize that those homes outside of the city limits have always had garbage pick-up once a week? But...dont you dare ask for water.

Help Thy Brother.....oh, except when it comes to water!!!



...
written by Rinkelstein , June 05, 2011 - 10:59 am
Hey Concerned,

Maybe you missed the part where it was discussed that the parish doesn't own a single part of LUS. The residents of the city of Lafayette own LUS. Broussard is not our responsibility. Broussard citizens elected a shit mayor and now they are paying the price with shit water.
...
written by Southsider , June 05, 2011 - 12:48 pm
Concerned wrote:
People ask why is it Lafayette's responsibility to help? Because Lafayette Parish is their representation. They are represented by Don Bertrand (Parish Rep).

Its NOT the city of lafyette responsibility. The are in the unincorporated area of the parish. They pay NO city of lafayette taxes. LUS belongs to the city, not anyone else. They(the other towns and unincorporated areas) are spoiled as to having city of lafayette services without having to pay for them. The bucks stops now. Its really a simple solution but the Mayor of Broussard won't incorporate the area into Broussard. HE is the problem, not Lafayette.
...
written by Concerned , June 05, 2011 - 03:46 pm
Southsider

I see your point. But for now, this is a consolidated government that the people voted on. Therefore, for now, they have to go to their city/parish representative...whether you like it or not. That is who they HAVE to go to. It sucks, but the truth. When I first moved here, I moved from a much poorer parish. And its funny how there, the parish set up multiple water districts to serve all the unincorp homes there. The police jury (parish) is in charge of that. So....why does a wealthier parish like Lafayette has soooo much trouble???? One reason....POLITICS!!!!!!! And when the unincorp homes here goes to the parish for help (as they should be able to do)....its 'SCREW YOU' from everyone, including the politicians. What a broken system we live in. And since no one in the precious city limits of Lafayette want these people to get LUS water, HOW ABOUT THE PARISH OF LAFAYETTE MAKE THEM INTO A WATER DISTRICT AND DRILL THEM A PROPER WATER WELL????? But I'm sure you guys would be pissed about that too. I feel sorry for those people, really I do.
...
written by Rinkelstein , June 05, 2011 - 06:33 pm
Concerned,

Vote for deconsolidation.
...
written by Just Wondering? , June 05, 2011 - 08:06 pm
Why have the citizens of shenandoah not sued TESI? There are many things that can be done to fix the water. Before they ask government to fix the problem, they should spend the money and go after TESI.
...
written by Southsider , June 06, 2011 - 05:52 am
Concerned..thats what happenes when you live in the unincorporated areas..I don't know what convenant won't them drill a water well but i think i'd drill one and pay the fine later. And yes i would be pissed. As Rinkelseing stated, vote for deconsolidation. As you can see, its not working. But again, why blame Lafayette? You live in Broussard, no? You are serviced by TESI, No? That is the problems, not Lafayette.
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , June 06, 2011 - 03:40 pm
Interestingly, I came across a fluoridated water listing from the CDC... http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/mwf/
What is striking is that there are a mere handful of water districts in East Baton Rouge Parish, in Orleans Parish and in all of Jefferson Parish.
Yet in places like Lafayette Parish, there are dozens, one for every country subdivision. Many seem to be relics of the 1970's and 80's when our Parish let subdivisions go up anywhere, Shenandoah, where I have family included. In that original section, every home had a well, but there was a consolidated sewer system. Later expansions of Shenandoah in the late 80's and early 90's completed the neighborhood (which sits straddling several natural gas pipelines even though the older section has no gas service) and it is these newer sections which were built atop an old Dairy Farm which I believe belonged to some Girouard heirs that are having the water problem. This neighborhood also had drainage problems in some sections which took nearly 10 years to be repaired by the Parish, I should know, I once flooded out a car there during the 2000 Tropical Storm Allison even though this neighborhood sits atop a high terrace draining into cypress bayou. Also, only this year have we seen partial repaving of streets in the neighborhood while half remain heavily worn in areas and not yet repaved.

My memory serves that Holiday Gardens had these exact same problems, which is why City of Lafayette annexed part of that neigborhood during Walter Comeaux's administration to repair all these defects. My recollection also is that TESI is the company that took over about 10+ years ago from another company which was having the same troubles with water and sewer. Is one of the higher water tables in the aquifer falling in our area?

Just for the record, no one in this neighborhood can vote in Broussard elections. Rinkelstein, your observation about the mayor is not something anyone in that area can have any say in.

The bigger issue this matter brings to light is the need for a comprehensive planning process that transcends the lines of any one municipality and jurisdiction, that can handle public utilities and transportation matters, which I think was part of Joey Durel's talking points in his 2003 campaign, the idea of regionalism. Maybe something like Portland Metro is the way to go? It would be nice to put all the turf battles and squabbling to rest.

Also, cheers to the commenter who mentioned that the mission of a city is more than simply profit generation. Cities are manifestation of a common interest and needs of their citizens. In many respects, people in Shenandoah consider themselves Broussard residents already.

(One other note, there will never be an opportunity to get on LUSFiber out there.)
...
written by Concerned , June 07, 2011 - 08:26 pm
Mr Faulk.

Great writing. I totally agree. When the area of government that represents you tells you..."We can't do anything for you....it has to be someone elses government" (but keep sending us your tax money)...then what is the point for them to represent you. What good do they do.

As for as LUSFiber.....those people just want drinking water, not internet and phone. They cant drink Fiberoptics!!!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it