News -> INDReporter TUE, JUN 7 11:38AM by Walter Pierce

CPC to set decon elex

The Lafayette City-Parish Council is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a resolution that would set Oct. 22 as the day voters in the parish decide whether our 15-year-old consolidated government should continue. Pending approval from the state Bond Commission, the referendum before voters would ask whether the existing Lafayette Home Rule Charter should be replaced with both a charter for the city of Lafayette and a charter for Lafayette Parish.

One of the quirks of this electoral process is that, although the smaller municipalities of Broussard, Carencro, Duson, Scott and Youngsville are autonomous from Lafayette Consolidated Government — they elected to opt out of LCG when the current form of consolidation took effect in 1996 — they still elect representatives to the City-Parish Council and will still get a say in whether LCG is replaced with separate city- and parish governments. More precisely, the autonomous small towns will help decide whether the city of Lafayette enjoys the same level of autonomy as they do.

In fact, it was largely the city of Lafayette’s lack of self-governance, especially in matters pertaining to city-owned Lafayette Utilities Service, that prompted the formation of the Lafayette Charter Commission last summer. After nine months of weekly meetings, the commission in April recommended what is effectively deconsolidation.

The council is required by law to set the election and is prohibited from amending the ballot proposition created by the charter commission. To read the referendum, click here.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (6)add
...
written by Rinkelstein , June 07, 2011 - 11:08 pm
It's about time. Let's deconsolidate. It hasn't done anything except give outlying areas of the parish a vote on Lafayette City issues. It's representation without taxation.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 08, 2011 - 02:08 am
We need consolidation, consolidate and allow the rest of the parish
( meaning the outlying towns ) to join Durel and his cronys at the hog trough..........Everyone is equal and everyone should get a bite.
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , June 08, 2011 - 06:11 pm
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 07, 2011
'We need consolidation, consolidate and allow the rest of the parish (meaning the outlying towns) to join Durel and his cronys at the hog trough..........Everyone is equal and everyone should get a bite.'

Dude, you are a trip! ROFL


...
written by James Melancon , June 08, 2011 - 08:29 pm
And replace the charter with what? I hear why the charter is bad but little explanation on what's next.

Why can't the City of Lafayette just absorb all areas not inside the smaller municipalities?
...
written by Andy Hebert , June 08, 2011 - 10:22 pm
Fundamentally flawed again:

THE “NEW CITY OF LAFAYETTE CHARTER” STATES:
“CITY CHARTER

ARTICLE I. INCORPORATION, FORM OF GOVERNMENT, BOUNDARIES, POWERS

Section 1-01. Home Rule Charter.

Section 8-14. Required Approval By Electors.
The Charter shall become effective only if approved by a majority of those voting on the Charter residing in Lafayette Parish.”

“IF APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING ON THE CHARTER RESIDING IN LAFAYETTE PARISH”

RESIDING IN LAFAYETTE PARISH?


Parish residents required to approve a City of Lafayette Charter?

Go figure!!!!!!!!!!

...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 10, 2011 - 11:55 am
Uh huh go figah, double digitals " RESIDING, in Lafayette Parish.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it