News -> INDReporter FRI, JUN 10 9:43AM by Walter Pierce

Profs slam UL system

An organization representing thousands of university professors in the United States is taking the University of Louisiana System to task for what it characterizes as “an unprecedented and unwarranted assault on its faculty.”

Writing for the American Association of University Professors, Michael F. Bérubé, chairman of the Subcommittee on Program Closures, points specifically to decisions by the administrations at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond and UL-Monroe that the AAUP says are a threat to tenure. The former discontinued its French program, fired three tenured professors in the program and then offered to rehire one of the professors as a temporary instructor. ULM, Bérubé says, is following a similar tack with four tenured chemistry professors, concluding:

The University of Louisiana System ... appears to be going well beyond anything that can be justified by economic hardship, launching a capricious assault on tenure as well as minimal standards of job security for the untenured. Faculty nationwide should be advised that the UL System has effectively nullified its tenure procedures; and students in the UL System, and their parents, should be advised that maintaining the quality of core liberal arts programs is no longer a priority of the UL System administration.

Read the full letter here.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (12)add
...
written by Farrow , June 10, 2011 - 12:59 pm
I don't really care about the issue of tenure, but I do care about what I see as the growing threat of anti-intellectualism in the U.S. -- and that is what I believe is really behind this movement against tenure. And by anti-intellectualism, I don't mean a dislike of intellectuals in themselves, but an even broader dislike of reason, logic, and rationality -- dislike that is rampant among the right-wing, Evangelical Christian, tea party set. I do not advocate that we move to the left, however -- I advocate that we move toward the center, toward moderation.
...
written by William Morvant , June 10, 2011 - 01:24 pm
Perhaps the best course of action is to de-nationalized education. This way tenure will be history, like the divine right of kings.
...
written by Morrow , June 12, 2011 - 08:53 am
Isn't it just like ULL to sacrifice some of their best to keep their favorites? I don't get it, but my kids do, cause they won't attend, not unless there is no other opportunity. I'm so disappointed in the university the past 10 or 15 yrs. When the past president made it more impt to reward those who helped his soninlaw become a millionaire, the university has become more a little kingdome, an organized crime unit type institution. And never, never, never to the betterment of the students, whom they just keep passing on their financial responsibilities. I resent the administration's lack of commitment to education, and their great concern for their own retirements.
...
written by William Morvant , June 12, 2011 - 12:04 pm
Morrow "past president made it more impt to reward those who helped his soninlaw become a millionaire, the university has become more a little kingdome, an organized crime unit type institution.
------------------

There is some true this, perhaps organized crime is over the top but I thought of the past president as more like Mr. Burns on the Simpsons.
...
written by JAnderson , June 12, 2011 - 05:01 pm
There is absolutely no accountability in our universities. Cost is constantly increasing, but quality is not. Our schools have become venues for the leftist, socialist agenda, and the students & parents have no say in what is going on in the classroom. Screw tenure. Earn your keep or get out. Just like the rest of us.
...
written by Morrow , June 13, 2011 - 08:04 am
There is some merit to tenure and that's possibly the motive for this "cleansing" going on @ ULL. Tenure allows profs who have been there longer than the univ pres to stand their ground. They don't have to worship @ the altar of the pres, they can't be controlled by the administration or big donors and I happen to like that. Its easy to conclude bucking the system might be a motivating factor as to why these profs are going. They probably don't kiss ass - the kind of prof I want educating.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 13, 2011 - 10:12 am
"growing threat of anti-intellectualism"..."And by anti-intellectualism... an even broader dislike of reason, logic, and rationality -- dislike that is rampant among the right-wing, Evangelical Christian, tea party set"

Although not very religious, I AM part of that right-wing tea party set you talk about. I think that I've been pretty good about sticking to logic, reason, and rationality when commenting here. I think I've presented very reasoned and thoughtful positions, backed them up with links and references, and I've given concrete examples when challenged to do so.

I've discussed philosophy and history here and I think most people would say that I'm well informed, logical, and rarely, if ever, emotional or shrill. Some of the other commenters here that would fit your definition of "the right" are also very reasonable and rational. Wouldn't you agree?

Based on what I see posted here at theIND.com, your comment simply doesn't hold water.

Also, I notice that you were careful to define what you mean by "anti-intellectualism", and also who exactly exhibits it. That's GREAT! So, tell us....what do you mean by "the left", and where do you see this "center, toward moderation" exhibited in America today? Let's be as clear about "the left" as we are about the "irrational" right. How can I know what you mean by "the center" when I only know what you call one extreme? Can you define the other extreme for us, too?
...
written by Resident , June 13, 2011 - 11:23 am
Farrow, I agree that anti-intellectualism is a problem but I don't think it's restricted to the "right wing" as defined by talking heads. I'm reluctant to use the phony labels foisted on us by the MSM and politicians to keep us ignorant and divided. In fact, that anti-intellectualism IS foisted on us by 24 hour cable infotainment masquerading as "news" and self-absorbed politicians of both parties. Anti-intellectualism is also needed to sustain a wasteful, consumerist society thriving on unsustainable resource use and worshiping the dollar.
...
written by The Original Northsidian , June 13, 2011 - 07:03 pm
Listen folks, I think the ULL administration is not worried about the students. They are worried about their pay and retirement benefits. They are also power hungry and like their @$$ kissed by the hangers on, donors, alumni, etc!! Why doesn't theind investigate how much retirement these ya-hoo's will be entitled to receive? And if you want to talk about entitlements this is where it's at!!
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 14, 2011 - 09:18 am
bump....

As usual, no real description of "left", "moderate", or "center". Only opposition to "the right" or "the tea party"....

I have asked this before, and I have yet to hear a really solid answer from the leftists here. What is your position, who are your "intellectual" forebears, what books do I read that tell me what your beliefs and positions really are? What concepts and principles animate your political thought?

What do you mean by "center" and "moderate"? Those terms are only meaningful when you know what two extremes you are in the center of, what opposing extremes you seek to moderate.

How about this? Who would you consider an extreme leftist? Bill Clinton? Lenin? Mao? Do you consider Obama a moderate or a leftist? Is John Breaux a moderate, or a leftist?

If you don't see your ideology reflected well in current public figures, then what positions are lacking in a "good leftist", or a "good moderate"?

If you "reject the labels", then define your positions so we CAN get past being "ingorant and divided"...at least in our small part of the country.




...
written by @ William Morvant , June 15, 2011 - 03:07 pm
de-nationalized education? Where did you get the idea that education was nationalized? Glen Beck?

God people are retarded around here.
...
written by BMP , June 17, 2011 - 04:28 pm
Apparently some people didn't actually read the article, which does not mention ULL, but two other universities in the University of Louisiana System. Don't tarnish ULL because some other school had to cut a department. Also, this article really doesn't give much information about the situation. Perhaps there weren't enough students in these departments to support the number of professors on the payroll. These schools are in dire straits financially and are subsidized by your tax dollars. If the professors aren't needed, its difficult to justify paying them.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it