News -> INDReporter TUE, JUN 28 10:19AM by Heather Miller

Against all odds, LPSB voting on tax props

After months of discussion and public outcry, the Lafayette Parish School Board is finally set to decide Wednesday whether to place two separate tax proposals on the ballot for voters this fall.

The first property tax, which would levy at least 23 mills in its first year to fund the issuance of $561 million in bonds, would be used to pay for the first phase of a $1.1 billion facilities master plan adopted by the board last year. Also included in the tax proposition is an additional 2 mills to be set aside for maintenance of the district’s schools and other facilities.

The other tax proposal, first introduced June 15 with a proposed 5.4 mills, would now ­— if approved — allow the board to levy an additional 12-mills that would raise no more than $19.5 million a year to fund a districtwide Pre-K4 program.

LPSS Finance Director Matt Dugas tells The Advocate that the sudden increase on the pre-K tax proposal acts as a safeguard for any potential future loss of state funding. The Advocate reports that over the past five years, Lafayette Parish schools have seen a loss of more than $736,000 in state funding for pre-k and other early learning programs.

The board’s quest for more tax money has raised concerns from some in the community, such as the 100 Black Men of Greater Lafayette, which asked the board a few months ago to hold off on a property tax until it selects a permanent superintendent and a long-term education plan to address the broad achievement gap for at-risk, low-income students.

And no surprise here, the tax props are also under fire from the Tea Party of Lafayette, one of the city’s most active political groups as of late. The group, on its website, has this to say about the school board: “Last time LPSB got a tax increase, it brokered a deal with the Chamber of Commerce to implement reforms and achieve performance benchmarks in exchange for the Chamber’s support on the sales tax increase. LPSB never even TRIED to hold up its end of the bargain after the election.  That tax increase in 2001 was for teacher pay raises, but LPSB used the money instead for its own pet project – lower class sizes.  LPSB ignored considerable pressure from the Chamber to hold up its end of the bargain.

“LPSB built 4 new schools in the late 90’s [sic], ignored a court order to desegregate, and was later forced to build a 5th school that it hadn’t budgeted,” TPL continues.

The special school board meeting, open to the public, is at 4:30 p.m. Wednesday at the central office.


Comments (23)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 28, 2011 - 10:33 am
" late 90’s [sic]". "sic" means it's misspelled, right? I thought you're supposed to put an apostrophe after the number when you're talking about a decade or range of numbers like that.

What's a good web reference for this kind of stuff? I saw another article today with "sic" after a decade with an apostrophe....




...
written by tif , June 28, 2011 - 04:00 pm
Where is Joey when you need him? Just tif the students 1 cent per child per hour and every body will be happy. Remember Diseny was a tif! We could have all of that at our schools and we would all save on vacations.
...
written by BoFred , June 28, 2011 - 09:07 pm
NO, NO, NO, NO MORE PROPERTY TAXES!!! AND THEN THE SONS OF YOU KNOW WHAT WANT, WHAT, ANOTHER 40 MILS?

SOMEONE FIGURE OUT WHAT 4O MILS IS ON A $190,000 home (minus $75 thou). Prek is not necessary. Parents can teach what is taught in Prek which is what my kids had. Or find another way to finance it because I don't want to pay for it!
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 28, 2011 - 10:50 pm
Never has Tax money for Teacher's raises ever been directed towards this end result, the LPSB has always managed to divert the monies to their special pork projects.

HELL, NO MORE TAXES !
...
written by Hope , June 29, 2011 - 05:29 am
I hope this initiative does not go through. I'm sure if it doesn't the LPSB will dog us to death, vote after vote, till it dogs us into giving in. What is it with education that it refuses to be fiscally responsible???? From the bus driver, ON THE DROP PROGRAM, I MIGHT ADD (What special degree do you have to get to drive a bus??? That's just sucking the taxpayers to the bone!) - to the clerks in the administrative office, they absolutley disregard the tax paying public. And to such a ENORMOUS extent? PRE K IS NOT A NECESSITY. THE DROP PROGRAM IS A SHAM! SPECIALTY SCHOOLS ARE A HOAX; go to trade school or college! LPSB should be told to maintain what is has within the budget it has and quit adding to the tax burden of home owners. I hope Lafayette parish homeowners turn out to vote in favor of keeping their homes!
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , June 29, 2011 - 01:04 pm
DAS AH GIMME, Even Lafayette voters can get it right after being flim-flammed over and over by the LPSB, No more asinine taxes, taxes which are never dedicated for their original purpose, which always seem to be put to use on failed programs, *baby sitting for Wal-Mart moms shopping outings, etc. HaH, the joke is always surfacing, *Special K programs and the LPSB failure to use tax monies to upgrade facility's, or to provide quality teachers who have the educational skills to teach our young, Oh, and I could go on and on and on with pointing out the sorry state of our state's educational system,
and the mismanagement of educational funds which have never arrived at the neediest point.
...
written by BoFred , June 29, 2011 - 04:14 pm
Northsidian, you are correct about "quality teachers who have educational skills to teach"!!! Several years ago, my GED mother got a job "tutoring" @ Myrtle Place Elem. after school hours, twice a week for an hr each day. She quit after a few weeks because she had a child with a behaviorial problem that she was not trained to deal with. She was shown the books, but was never given any training and was certainly not educated in spec ed and had no educational training much less a degree in education. She felt as if she would do more harm than good and refused to suck a paycheck from the educational system. So I'm not real inclined to trust the Laf Parish educational system....
...
written by Ugiveit , June 29, 2011 - 09:15 pm
Mz Walker, these are NOT my schools & I'm totally against giving the LPSB ANY more of my money to waste. Sorry. Close down some of those specialty schools, start school on a later date (have the laws changed since test scores have NOT improved in 20 yrs), go to a 4 day week if you have to, but DO NOT TAKE ANY MORE PROPERTY TAXES FROM ME!!! I will never support any more LPSB taxes until that entity is more fiscally responsible with that money. Ms. Walker, the LPSB has NOT maintained the schools so WHY THE HELL SHOULD I BELIEVE THEY CAN BE TRUSTED TO DO SO WITH MORE MONEY AND MORE SCHOOLS? YOU GIVE THEM ALL THE MONEY YOU WANT BUT DON'T TAKE ANY MORE OF MINE. THANK YOU.
...
written by Hope , June 30, 2011 - 05:31 am
I heard one of the #s, "on an average house, the tax liability would go up $200 a year". Well, that is an ENORMOUS AMOUNT to me! My homeowner's insurance has increased twice in the past two years, & its roughly $200 a month now. That additional two hundred bucks doesn't include the ANNUAL INCREASE IN PROPERTY TAX due to inflationary property values... ITS GOT TO STOP SOMETIME AND I WANT IT TO STOP NOW. I have in the past called them Tea Baggers, but since I'm becoming one, I'd have to stop. I am absolutely embracing the The Tea Party movement. Ms. Walker, whom I saw give a statement on TV, is welcomed to give as much as she wants to donate to the school system, but I'm tapped out. I do not want to lose my house cause the school board is negligent in maintaing their buildings. (DROP THE DROP PROGRAM!) IT LITERALLY IS GOING TO BE A MATTER OF IF I TAKE MY MEDICATION or pay Ms. Walker's new property taxes.
...
written by ben , June 30, 2011 - 08:36 am
Ugiveit, I agree with you, let the parents who send their children to these schools pay for it. Parents who care about their children pay enough by sending their children to privite schools. They should have to pay for the education of their children that attend the school. If they had to pay for their childrens education they would demand a better edusation for their children instead of using the system as a baby sitting service until they go to jail.
...
written by ragin_cajun , June 30, 2011 - 09:18 am
So....uhhh....think this tax will pass?..:)


Seriously, though. It's like the LPSB is politically tone deaf! This is the worst time in American History to ask voters to approve a tax increase. Why would they go through with this?

I wonder...how much does an election like this cost? I hope not much, because reading comments from readers, it sure seems like this tax increase is doomed. Even theIND says it's "against all odds".

What are they thinking? They can't be this stupid.
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , June 30, 2011 - 11:25 am
BoFred - A 40 mills increase on a $190,000 home would amount to $460 extra a year.

1 mill = 1/1000 of a dollar or $.001

$190,000(Assessed Value) - $75,000(Homestead Exemption) = $115,000 x 10%(Assessment Rate) = $11,500 x .040(40 x .001) = $460

Hope - Lafayette Tax Assessor claims average home value in Lafayette to be $150,000, therefore a 23 mills + 2 mills + 5.4 mills, which equals 30.4 mills, would be an annual increase of $228 per home in Lafayette. If I understand the article, the board would be able to levy up to another 6.6 mills on top of the 30.4 for a potential grand total of 37 mils, which would equate to an annual increase of $277.50 per year for the average household.

Use the formula above to calculate for your own home. Oh, and commercial property owners don't get the homestead exemption.



...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , June 30, 2011 - 12:02 pm
Let's also not forget, the second half of the Master Plan still has no funding, so, I'm sure another millage tax would be proposed in 5 or so years.
...
written by the original northsidian , June 30, 2011 - 05:38 pm
Why not tax the so called "Farm Land" for it's actual value. If the tax passes the Saloom property tax will go up .32 cents a month? And yours $450.00 a year? What's wrong with that picture!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOW MANY FRICKIN PROPERTY TAX INCREASES HAVE WE HAD IN THE LAST 20 YEARS>>>>>ANSWER: TOO MANY!!!

Vote NO, for more leaking schools!!!!!!!!!!!!
...
written by just asking , June 30, 2011 - 05:42 pm
Where does the Tea Party, Republican Party,Democratic Party and the Lafayette Chamber of Commerce stand on the tax increase??

We already know how the bus drivers will vote!!
...
written by Hope , July 01, 2011 - 05:50 am
those bus drivers, and I love them as much as I love the cafeteria ladies, the janitors and the teachers, but BUS DRIVERS ON THE DROP PROGRAM??? How could I possibly trust LPSB with more money. Heck people, $500 a yr more, and more on top of that, will change my lifestyle completely: as in I'll be in the dark, sweating my behind off, reading by the lantern. Seriously, when milk is nearly $6 a gallon and a bread is $3, its tough to feed 3 kids. You know what school lunch is and you know what, THEY DON'T COOK IN SCHOOL ANYMORE; they open a huge can of cheese liquid crap, pour it over the chips they opened, open a big ole bag of lettuce and viola! YOU HAVE NACHOS! So I'm hesitant to apply for free lunch - I'm not a sucker. I don't suck off the system, I don't get food stamps. I work. I clean. I cook. We don't go on vacations. We visit relatives and call it a vacation.... I'm not crying, whining, I'm explaining. I saying why I don't want to lose my house because the swchool board has been negligent in its duties. I don't want kids in schools that are leaking, but there are buildings that don't leak. There is waste, waste, waste in the educational system! Clean up the back yard before you take more of my money.
...
written by Pedro , July 01, 2011 - 07:35 am
The fact is we ELECT the LPSB and PAY them to be our representatives on the LPSB. It is sad, a community filled with an abundance of educated and hard working citizens elects a bunch of yahoos with limited education to run our schools.

Many of us don't have the option of moving our children to private schools. It does not mean we don't care about their education.

Voting yes to this tax compares to repairing the damage caused by a leaky roof and never repairing the roof. Until we "fix" central office, we will have the same result we have had for the last 30 years.
...
written by ragin_cajun , July 01, 2011 - 08:58 am
Uhhhh.....I think it's safe to assume the TEA Party is against a tax increase. They got the name from "taxed enough already"....but you can always check their website...:)
...
written by the original northsidian , July 01, 2011 - 02:38 pm
ragin_cajun: What about the tax loving Republicans, Democrats and let's not forget the ulitmate tax increase lover the Lafayette Chamber of Commerce. Lafayette is the only place in the USA that the Republicans love a tax increase!! Is it because they all own under valued FARM PROPERTY?

WHAT SAY YOU, CONRAD COMEAUX???
...
written by BoFred , July 03, 2011 - 09:38 am
O. North., I hear Mr. Comeaux will have opposition in the next election.... At least you'll have someone else to consider. I heard tell that opposition is the reason the assessor's office was buying TV time for "public service announcements".
...
written by the original northsidian , July 03, 2011 - 01:09 pm
BoFred: And is that why he is now telling folks over 65 about the freeze on home assessment? Very strange, since this has been in place for many years now. I hope someone runs against the "I have never seen a tax increase I don't Like" assessor!! Then maybe he could try and get a real job!!
...
written by rambeaux rawlings , July 05, 2011 - 08:04 am
Remember when Communists were our biggest threat and not taxes? Remember when communities took pride in their public school systems? Remember when civic responsibility extended beyond one's property line or immediate family?
... me neither.
...
written by stacyc , August 15, 2011 - 02:18 pm
Wow. Patriots, eh?

Since when do "Patriots" not give a crap about our children's education? When it has to come out of the "Patriots" pockets. What a shame.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it