News -> INDReporter WED, JUL 20 4:29PM by Walter Pierce

Appeals court ups award to beaten bar patrons

RichardLe
This October 2006 photo shows plaintiff Richard Le in a Lafayette hospital following his altercation with Nitetown bouncers.

[Editor's Note: This story has been updated with a statement from Nitetown's attorney.]

A downtown Lafayette nightclub has been informed by an appeals court that a jury’s damages in a suit brought by two men beaten by the club's bouncers were too low and the club is on the hook for even more.

Nitetown, a Jefferson Street club popular among the college set for its live music, has been ordered by the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal to pay $55,000 in damages to Richard Le and Edward Prince. The former, whose October 2006 beaten required hospitalization and physical therapy, is to receive $50,000; the jury’s original award was about $30,000. Prince’s award was increased from $1,900 to $5,000. District Judge Herman Clause presided over the March 2010 civil trial.

In its opinion released Wednesday, the appeals court characterized the award for Le as “abusively low.” The appeal challenging the jury's award, was filed by Le and Prince, whom the jury found partially responsible for their injuries.

The incident happened in an enclosed alley off Buchanan Street behind the Jefferson Street venue, which has a rear door that opens onto the alley. Nitetown suspended the bouncers, who never returned to work at the club, according to a statement released last year by the club’s owner.

Costs for the appeals court hearing were also assessed to Nitetown. Read the full opinion here.

Early Thursday afternoon, Nitetown attorney Thomas Hightower issued the following statement:

Nitetown respectfully disagrees with the three (3) to two (2) decision of the Third Circuit overturning the Judgment of the Trial Court.  Two (2) dissenting judges essentially espoused Nitetown’s position.  Nitetown will request that the Louisiana Supreme Court review the action of the Third Circuit Court of Appeal.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (4)add
...
written by William Morvant , July 21, 2011 - 01:09 pm
Although, sympathetic to Richard Le and Edward Prince, perhaps the better lesson is to find entertainment in a less risky environment.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 21, 2011 - 01:29 pm
How " Macho of them !
...
written by Hope , July 21, 2011 - 02:54 pm
I applaud the judge in this case. Where it happened & why don't concern me as much, no one deserves to be beaten. I applaud the judge who through his years of service, saw the award was too low. I have a dear relative who had to have surgery on a knee because she slipped in oil on the lot of an auto parts store who had been allowing customers to do oil changes in the lot. This woman was in her 70s & her recuperation was long & painful. She won her case against the company but the jury allotted her less money than what her medical expenses were. And the jury found her 5 % negligent because she should have looked where she was waling. Somtimes juries just don't make the right judgement.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , July 22, 2011 - 02:37 am
Jurors are couillions, they attempt to use logic and can't even spell the word...much less think on any matter factually...
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it