News -> INDReporter THU, JUL 28 11:30AM by Walter Pierce

Ethics: Board subject to disclosure rule

[Editor's Note: This story was updated at 5:27 p.m. Thursday to reflect our conversation with Glenn Dugas.]

Members of the all-volunteer Lafayette Workforce Investment Board must disclose their personal finances beginning in May of next year, according to an advisory opinion issued by the Louisiana Ethics Board on Wednesday.

In a letter to Glenn Dugas, executive administrator of the LWIB, Ethics Board member Tracy Barker explains that because Lafayette Parish’s population has exceeded 200,000, LWIB board members are subject to the financial disclosure rule enacted as part of Gov. Bobby Jindal’s sweeping ethics reform package a few years ago. That requirement led to a wave of resignations from boards and commissions statewide, many by volunteer appointees who didn’t want their personal finances subject to public scrutiny.

Dugas tells The Ind that the personal disclosure requirement “isn’t very onerous,” and that board members are not required to disclose personal income. They are only required to divulge ownership of private companies and income earned in industries like gaming. Dugas adds that none of the 31 members of the LWIB has expressed an intention to resign from the board due to the new disclosure requirement.

The LWIB, according to LCG’s website, “serves Lafayette Parish and receives federal money that is used to provide a variety of services to businesses and job seekers through the Lafayette Business and Career Solutions Center.”

Lafayette Parish’s growth beyond the 200,000 population threshold is likely to affect most of the boards and commissions in the parish. State ethics law requires members of boards that “disburse, invest, or expend $10,000 or more in funds in a fiscal year to file an annual personal financial disclosure statement.” There are nearly 30 such bodies operating in Lafayette Parish.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (3)add
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , July 28, 2011 - 09:12 pm
I wonder if Governor Jindal obtained his "gold-plated platinum standard" or whatever he is still referring to this as, from ALEC the American Legislative Exchange Council, a fake "non-partisan" education organization that has been responsible for propagating offensive legislation into law across the country at the state level via our legislators. I say offensive, because it is offensive to me to see anyone with personal prosperity marginalized out of public service in this way. It is offensive to me to see cities and public services privatized for financial gain by a narrow set of interests looking for new "growth" opportunities while using the public realm to stick regular working people and out of work people with the tab. Yes, if you are out of work, you are getting the tab too, in reduced street maintenance, policing, fire, university funding and tuition, public health and affordable universal access to health care, and a sustainable environment instead of one being pillaged and undermined for short term gain. It's not entirely accurate when they say money doesn't grow on trees. Cut the tree down, no more money, cut the whole forest ecological economy down, where will it regrow from? Take from the forest for its ability to regenerate and provide more life, it would sustain us. Just a metaphor to put all this mess into context.

If I was a conspiracist, this personal financial disclosure requirement, while activating our noblest notions of undoing public corruption would instead seem all part of a well orchestrated sleeper move to push good people out of government leaving only knuckleheads, numbskulls and know-nothings behind while the puppetmasters do their dirty work.

This is not a good direction we are going in. Check out the recent LCG minutes, another person resigned from a city-parish volunteer committee for needs of privacy of financial assets, mind you, not active dealings and contracts and personal relationships.

If the public continues to have fewer and fewer outlets to civic participation, and few trade unions and other civic associations, we may yet see more sufferable alternatives pop up. We're better than this.
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , July 28, 2011 - 09:13 pm
...or as an episode of Star Trek asked, "Who Will Watch the Watchers?"
...
written by Yahoo Wahoo , July 29, 2011 - 11:18 am
Too bad Governor Jindal doesn't have to follow his own rules...
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it