News -> INDReporter FRI, AUG 12 10:38AM by Walter Pierce

La. Voice: Jindal ‘bundling’ big bucks

Tom Aswell of Capitol News Service in Baton Rouge has some interesting insights in a recent "Louisiana Voice" blog about the practice of “bundling,” a shady campaign-finance practice that has crept into American politics often as a means of circumventing Federal Elections Commission regulations. Specifically, Aswell takes aim at Gov. Bobby Jindal’s roughly $12 million re-election war chest, which has been padded by contributions from Goldman Sachs, BP, ExxonMobil, Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Lorillard Tobacco.

Not only was bundling done on a wholesale basis on Jindal’s behalf, but identical contributions by individuals and committees, many on the same dates totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars, routinely appeared in separate reports filed by candidate Jindal, the Committee to Re-elect Bobby Jindal, and Friends of Bobby Jindal, Inc. Contributions ranged from $500 to $5,000.

Moreover, Aswell asserts that some of the bundling linked to Jindal’s campaign can be tied to a former Washington, D.C., influence peddler who has former connections to the infamous Tom Delay and Jack Abramoff.

Read more here.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (6)add
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , August 12, 2011 - 05:03 pm
GA, will we be so lucky to have this Gourmond go off to wreak some more havoc as our dear beloved muslim loving OBAMA, as our next joke of a president, take care of the cronys, YOU BET !
...
written by James Melancon , August 12, 2011 - 05:29 pm
Unions, corporations, or individuals should be free to donate; it's called free speech.
...
written by Allen Melancon , August 12, 2011 - 08:46 pm
Yes, they should be free to donate but said donations should not circumvent the law. That is not free speech. That is illegal. Our ersatz governor, Piyush Jindal, is so brillant that he will eventually go the way of all "I am so smart and above it all" public office holders. He will be busted. It is only a matter of time. He just doesn't know it because he is so smart, so smug, so arrogant, and so sure that he won't make a mistake and will continue to fool everyone. Office holders like Piyush are always eventually brought down by their own smug arrgoance. No matter what party they belong to. Delane, Foley, Edwards, Nixon, and to be added sometime in the future: Jindal
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 13, 2011 - 11:22 am
"Yes, they should be free to donate but said donations should not circumvent the law."

Sounds reasonable to me.
...
written by Dean , August 13, 2011 - 01:36 pm
Most of those corporate contributors are members of the American Legislative Exchange Council [ALEC]. jindal gave an opening speech last week as ALEC held there bi-annual meeting at the Marriot in New Orleans. Corporations join ALEC [as do legislators] for the purpose of passing 'Modal Legislation'through state legislators, to pass into laws that benefit the corporations. In return legislators [and a certain governor] are rewarded with corporate monies [they call it a scholorship fund]. One of thier biggest agendas is 'privitization' look up the recipients[potential as well] of some of these state contracts: Prison sales: CCA, Geo-Group,[gave money to Jindal], Office of Group Benefits: Goldman Sachs [more money], Medicaid: Aetna connected [still more money. All of these companies are members of ALEC, just like Jindal.
...
written by Resident , August 14, 2011 - 07:08 pm
Dean has it right. Unlimited corporate campaign contributions just mean that corporations will have even more power to virtually write legislation usually means a loss to consumer/individual rights. ALEC is a perfect and dangerous example of this. They are working hard on state and local levels to cement the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few. And no surprise, Jindal is neck deep in it.

Corporations are not individuals and should not be able to give obscene amounts of money to legislators or write "Model Legislation." Individuals can't come close to giving this amount of money, and let's not pretend that unions can either. Money=power. The single biggest problem in our federal and state government is crony corporate influence that benefits corporations and legislators but reduces consumer/individual rights. Government is supposed to protect the rights of individuals, not diminish them by empowering corporations.

As Chief Justice John Marshall said: "A corporation is an artificial being, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of law. Being the mere creature of law, it possesses only those properties which the charter of creation confers upon it, either expressly, or as incidental to its very existence."

And before anyone starts with the "you're just against corporations or anyone making money," please spare me that nonsense. It's not corporations making money that is the problem; it's corporations controlling government and writing laws that is the problem. If we had this bad of a situation back in the 1970's, the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act probably would not have been created.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it