News -> INDReporter TUE, SEP 20 10:47AM by Walter Pierce

Advocacy for LPSS prop under way

LPSS_MASTER_PLANA political action committe formed in mid-August in support of the Lafayette Parish School System’s Oct. 22 tax proposition for the Master Facilities Plan has produced a website laying out its case that passage of the tax is essential for the future of the parish’s public school system.

The website, Invest in Our Children’s Future, was created by a PAC of the same name. The site includes a 10-minute video produced by the Lafayette chapter of the League of Women Voters detailing the more deplorable conditions of some of Lafayette’s school facilities. The video was actually produced more than three years ago. The site also contains a more slickly produced 30-second commercial advocating passage of the plan, in addition to links to CSRS’ master plan — a $1.1 billion undertaking that has been split into two phases, the first of which is on the Oct. 22 ballot and would fund $561,000 in projects through a 25 mills increase in the parish property tax.

The site argues, as proponents of the plan have for months, that putting off these repairs, upgrades and school replacements will cost  more the longer the parish waits:

With the ages of our school buildings and the lack of preventative maintenance and capital projects, our school facilities will age faster and cost MUCH more to repair. Waiting costs more money – rising costs, inflation and tighter budgets will cost us more year after year. Using a 3% inflation cost and factoring in the price tag presently of the 1st Phase of the Master Facility Plan ($561,000,000) we would see an increase of at least $16,830,000 dollars by waiting just ONE more year!


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (73)add
...
written by Southsider , September 20, 2011 - 04:52 pm
I can think of $18m reasons why this video was produced. But why put the burden on only landowners in the parish? Why not put a 1-cent sales tax on EVERYONE, that way the burden isn't so unpleasent and everyone contributes. What about the elderly on fixed income? What about people that own a resident AND have a business where they own the building/property? They will be taxed twice. Even welfare recipents shop, even people that rent shop. Lets share the burden. I will vote NO as long as the burden is on only lawnowers.
...
written by And so now... , September 20, 2011 - 06:12 pm
After decades of mismanagement and misuse of taxpayer monies the LPSS is proposing a large property tax increase. A 25 mill increase that will automatically double to 50 mills in five years if we taxpayers allow this nonsense to take place. The decision from this retired teacher is no where, no how, no way am I supporting this tax. Many teachers, support personnel, and central office staff are not supporting this tax. They, out of fear, do not openly oppose the proposed property tax increase but they are not supporting it and will not vote for it.

...
written by Who Der , September 20, 2011 - 06:16 pm
Stick to your guns Mr. Durel, we're behind you.
...
written by Mayor Charles E. Langlinais , September 20, 2011 - 06:42 pm
I could support a sales tax because EVERYONE pays based on what they consume/purchase. The above comment (by and so now)truly stuns me....does the proposed 25 mill increase double to 50 mills at 5 years??? What I am most incessed about is this contract with NSRS.....does the public know that they will get 3 1/2 % of the top....$18 mil to "manage" the construction of any projects....that doesn't include the state standard of 6-8% for architects to design and build improvements.....you can get a degreed construction manager for $100k a year!! I have yet found anyone that is supporting this including LPSB employees!
...
written by Hope , September 20, 2011 - 06:58 pm
NO PROP TAX, NO SALES TAX! The LPSB has had years to do its job maintaining schools, with property taxes for that and EVER INCREASING sales tax. NO NO NO IF YOU HAVE MONEY FOR A PAC, SEND IT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD! I have NOT had a raise in over 3 yrs, but feel I am fortunate to collect a check, but the majority of my property taxes goes to the school board already. Borrow money & pay it back, fix what you can, open some of those closed schools, get rid of specialty schools, and GET RID OF THE DROP PROGRAM! OPEN SCHOOL IN SEPTEMBER - HOW MUCH MONEY WILL THAT SAVE. Sometimes I just want to say "Go to He$$!" give what you want, but do not legislate to me to give more. Also, I have heard whispers from school employees, if these prop taxes go thru, ALL EMPLOYEES WILL GET A RAISE! Take that $4 Million and do repairs! Again ladies, not no, but NO WAY IN HELL, NO!

...
written by Mo , September 20, 2011 - 07:06 pm
Okay, my mom works the elections. During the last one, she was in a school cafeteria and the floors were filthy, the tables needed to be wiped down. There are employees who should be cleaning, if not janitors, the the darned cafeteria workers should be, since they don't cook at schools anymore, they heat up. Bus drivers are on "the drop" program, and yet there is a waiting list as long as your arm to be a school bus driver. Employees aren't saying anything against property taxes because they figure once they get their raises after this billion dollar tax, it will even out. Oh, I'll just bet there are some construction people supporting this cause their firms will make disgustingly enormous fees, hundreds of millions in the long run. But no! The answer is no. Period. No sales tax, no property tax. The End. Now get back to work.


...
written by holeinthedonut8 , September 20, 2011 - 07:15 pm
Consider if you can, that every possible measure has been taken to keep the school board OUT of this project, some of them are not even in favor of new school buildings. The PROFESSIONAL project managers get 3.5 percent to manage 40+ Projecdts, there's an oversight committee, the money is dedicate and CANNOT be redirected, there is NO other money that this is "replacing" - this is new money with a dedicated mission and very little school board input.

Consider also, if not now when? Are you willing to let the next company president that tours Lafayette drive by a school and tell him this represents Lafayette's commitment to education?

Are you willing to pay MUCH more later by waiting OR are you saying "Let the schools rot", its one or the other.




...
written by RuthT , September 20, 2011 - 08:03 pm
Hope - if you heard rumors that school employees are going get a raise if the additional millage tax is passed then somebody is spreading LIES. Money raised via the proposed 25 mills increase will go into a completely separate account administered by a citizen's oversight committee (already in place) and the LPSS central office will NOT be able to get their hands on it. This language was written into the Master Facility Plan early on and is repeated in many way throughout the text of the Plan. Anyone who has actually bothered to read it, instead of listen to or spread rumors, would know that.

Are there things in the LPSS budget that could be cut? Absolutely, but no amount of cuts can ever provide the money needed to BUILD NEW SCHOOLS, which is what we need, or even begin to repair and add on to the schools we have.

And no, Mayor Charles & And so now, the millage does NOT and WILL NOT automatically increase by 50% after 5 years. That would be illegal! It will NOT increase AT ALL. What will happen is that the money collected in the first 5 years will be spent on Phase 1 of the Plan and the money collected after that will be spent on Phase 2.

As for the $18 million CSRS will be paid over many years to manage the project...that is a BARGAIN when you consider that they will oversee projects at 36 DIFFERENT SCHOOLS throughout a large parish. Not to mention the fact that CSRS actually has experience in working with school systems. Why don't you ask Lourdes what they paid their construction management firm for a project which lasted less than a year?!

I'm not a member of the PAC, I don't work for LPSS, and I have no political aspirations whatsoever. I am a parent who has spent thousands of hours in Lafayette Parish schools where mushrooms are growing out of the walls, ceiling leaks have destroyed computers, non-functioning ACs have forced teachers and kids to hold classes in the library, huge tangles of electrical cords plugged into inadequate outlets have caused school blackouts, and class changes are stopped during bad weather because the kids can't get across a muddy swamp to get to their next class.... OUR KIDS AND TEACHERS DESERVE BETTER.
...
written by Amberlynn , September 20, 2011 - 08:47 pm
Thank you Ruth T! Finally, someone with FACTS and a BRAIN.

I ask all of you naysayers to tour just one school facility within our parish. Get all the information before you jump on the NO bandwagon. Read the wording of the proposed bond.

How many new businesses have we lost to Houston simply because our schools can't compare? How many millions of dollars does that amount to?

And Mayor Langlinais, if you haven't found anyone in support of this issue then you obviously haven't asked anyone other than yourself. Ask the teachers teaching in your town, ask the parents sending their kids to moldy overcrowded schools in your town what they think. As a person holding office you have a responsibility to get all of the facts on an issue before you speak out against it. Shame on you for being so shortsighted and for spreading false/misleading information. Get all the facts, tour the schools and while you are there ask the teachers.


...
written by Kit Kat , September 20, 2011 - 08:49 pm
Our school facilities are an embarrassment to Lafayette. The School Board can't touch this new money. The PAC has no affilitation with the school board, they simply support a school board issue.


...
written by the original northsidian , September 20, 2011 - 09:04 pm
Raise your property taxes again & again & again & again & again. I pray that the people who own property in Lafayette Parish are not the dummies the elected official think we are!!
...
written by Ophelia 46 , September 20, 2011 - 09:21 pm
If the school system had done its job maintaining the schools, this would be a 100 million dollar project instead of more than a billion. And I believe the bonding attorney said they had enough bonding capacity to do some of the more needed schools (e.g. Laf. High and Alleman) The bottom line is: The school board has proven over and over that they cannot be trusted to do the right thing --- only the political thing. And there are no guarantees that they will follow through on the recommendations of the citizens committee, because there really is no way to do that. And the CSRS proposal is an open ended 3.3 per cent of $561 million to start with -- there is no end to what they and their politically chosen subs can (and will) charge. School board said hey absolutely had to approve the CSRS proposal (haven't seen their contract yet) immediately in order to "hit the ground running." Anybody who's ever done a project this large knows that it will take time to sell the bonds and do all the other things -- like actually designing the schools, etc -- so they really didn't need to vote in August for a October 22ballot issue. Another case in point: They vote to spend 21 million to turn N.P. Moss (one of the newest schools in the parish) into a technical high school befire the state could take it over because of dismal test scores. Do we really need a technical high school with all the vo-tech schools and the WD Smith Career Center? There are so many more important things that need to be done to make Lafayette Parish schools "schools of excellence" and they have very little to do with a maassive construction project. Many of us have been fooled before by the politicians --- not this time. Beware the jabberwocky.

...
written by From Kermit and Greg , September 20, 2011 - 09:49 pm
From two school board members, this tax will fund building a new Laf High, Northside High and a auditorium at Comeaux, thats it. Do we need to spend A HALF A BILLION DOLLARS on three buildings?
...
written by RuthT , September 20, 2011 - 10:33 pm
Property taxes in Lafayette Parish are laughably low, as is the millage currently allotted to the school system (32.2). Progressive communities - that is those that give a damn about their community and it's children's future and want to attract new business - have an average dedicated school system millage of 60 mills. It won't be many years before Lafayette becomes the poor stepchild of those parishes where the educational infrastructure has been shored up and modernized.

The reason our facilities have been so woefully neglected is that the system has had to institute one budget cut after another BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY COMING IN TO MAINTAIN FACILITIES! That's the problem this new millage tax is designed to solve.

And once again, every precaution has been taken to ensure that the school board and central office CANNOT GET THEIR HANDS ON THE MONEY. That is why a citizens oversight committee -- composed of a wide range of citizens -- has been established. To prevent any use of the funds outside the stated purposes of building, repairing, adding to and maintaining Lafayette Parish school facilities.

And Kermit/Greg - if 2 school board members actually told you that all of the money would be used at Northside and Comeaux then they either misunderstood the question or you misunderstood the answer. Or you were talking to 2 of the worst idiots on the board.

If the millage passes, all 36 schools will receive money to begin addressing deferred maintenance. 7 schools will be Rebuilt: Northside and Lafayette High, LJ Alleman Middle, Carencro Heights, Green T. Lindon, Katherine Drexel and JW Faulk elementary schools.

6 schools will receive wing additions and/or expansions: Alice Boucher, Broadmoor, Evangeline and Ridge elementary schools, Scott Middle and Comeaux High.

People need to stop embarrassing themselves by spewing lies and hearsay and accepting rumor as fact. Try finding out the fact for yourselves, you might learn something.

Go to www.investinourchildrensfuture.org
...
written by CV , September 20, 2011 - 10:49 pm
The school board cannot include this money in the general budget and it is ILLEGAL for it to be deposited into the general fund account. It must, by LAW be used only for facilities and the maintenance of said facilities. We have not specifically funded school buildings and their maintenance since 1964. This is an embarrassment for our community! Is this what we really think of our children?

Is it okay for our children to have breathing problems because they are spending their days in classrooms that have visible mold growing on the ceiling and walls? Is it okay for them to miss days of school because they have sinus infections and asthma attacks due to the poor air quality of their school? Is it okay for our children to be in schools where the sewage backs up into the classroom because there are tree roots in the sewage lines because the school was built in the 1950s?

It is perfectly understandable that we have no warm and fuzzy feelings for the school board, but do we have any warm and fuzzy feelings for our children?

I don't care whether you have children in Catholic schools or public schools, the condition of our public schools affects you. The condition of our schools says something about our community to businesses who want to come here and set-up shop. It says something about the importance we place on education and our beloved youth. The school board has spent approximately $800,000 busing Catholic school children. If the parish continues to spend over budget in order to keep these crumbling buildings in some sort of working order, it is going to be hard to justify busing children who do not attend Catholic schools. I'm scared that that money will need to be pulled and applied to repairing facilities. If the millage increase passes, then that money can remain in the general fund because repairs will be funded through the millage revenue.

It is a travesty to say we value our children and their education when we ask them to spend 8 hours a day in buildings that are hazardous to their health. How can we say that we are a progressive community, a great place to raise our families when we don't back the one thing we should all be able to agree on. Every person I talk to "complains" about the condition of Texas schools as compared to Lafayette schools. Yes, they are better because they saw the importance in making schools a priority. Well I ask, when will we? Please show your children that you value them.

When will we love our children more than we hate the school board? I hope it's soon, like October 22.
...
written by CV , September 20, 2011 - 10:58 pm
Kermit and Greg,

Please check your facts. The 1/2 billion dollars does not just build 3 buildings. It will build news schools, repair others, add wings to some other still. Please make sure that you share all the facts. Shame on the school board members for either not knowing or not admitting the full story and its facts. I ask you, how much money are we spending trying to keep the old buildings standing? That certainly isn't cheap.
...
written by holeinthedonut8 , September 20, 2011 - 11:08 pm
If we raise the property tax by a "relatively" small 25 mills, Lafayette will STILL BE lower than the parishes we compete with for teachers and others looking at locations for businesses. People have choices and Lafayette, by this vote will tell the rest of the competitive areana that we choose to 1) stay consistently behind by voting FOR this or 2) Falling FURTHER BEHIND by voting against it.

Your choices are just that. Even if you vote for----Lafayette is still behind, for example, St. Tammany - where 2 out of 3 state principles of the year work.
...
written by realitycheck , September 20, 2011 - 11:27 pm
No amount of money will suffice if there is mismanagement. An insider tells me that the computer tracking finances is totally messed up and the money is going into a black hole. Extra money is just a patch to cover that there's no understanding of where money goes to! Must say NO until we have a lean, mean, runnin' machine and get rid of crazy and useless programs. And did I tell you , how much we HATE the COURT program for reading!! Go back to phoenix, fonix, phonicks, ... no wait........
...
written by And so now... , September 20, 2011 - 11:37 pm
We are now besieged by the pro tax people on this blog who will be putting on the final push to get this 25 mill property increase passed by the voting, taxpaying, property owning public. holeinthedonut8, CV, and RuthT, this 25 mill proposed property tax increase that doubles in five years will not pass. The federal government is cutting, the state government is cutting, the LCG is cutting, but Lafayette Parish School System is giving an extra paycheck to the likes of Lawrence Lilly. Our elderly on fixed incomes haven't had a COLA in three years but their Medicare premiums have increased. State retirees have not had a COLA in three years, yet their health care premiums have increased. Retired teachers have not received a COLA in three years, yet their health care premiums have increased as well. State employees have had their salaries frozen for over two years, yet Lafayette teachers still receive their step increases and a bonus check to boot. The bonus check comes from "overlooked" extra money on the books. Isn't "overlooked" money in fact mismanaged money? The LPSS Central Office has the highest percentage of rehired retirees in the state. The contract bus drivers are the highest paid in the country and the lies of how money will be spent from the school board are historical as well as hysterically funny. With this economy the timing of this proposed high property tax increase is not funny. It is just plain stupid. Lets have a pool how on badly this item on the ballot fails because it is destined to fail. Badly.
...
written by PTCParent , September 21, 2011 - 12:16 am
I am a very active parent that has spent countless hours volunteering at schools in Lafayette Parish! Overwhelmingly, the teachers at my son's school ARE IN FAVOR of this tax referendum! How do I know? I asked them!!! I wanted to know if this referendum would make a difference in their lives and the lives of their students at school! Not ONE teacher told me these changes weren't needed! Not ONE!!! Where are these naysayers getting their information?!?

At our Parent Open House recently a HUGE topic of discussion amongst the parents was this referendum! So, I decided to ask/research the information that we, as parents, were concerned with. Here's what I found:

Is this dedicated strictly to building facilities?
It is.

Is it going into the general budget and can it be used in other departments?
No. We were told it is against state law for these funds to be used for any other purpose ( I checked it out, it's true).

Who would be in charge of this HUGE construction project? Who would ensure that this plan would happen in the time frame that was written and in the order that was set forth in the plan?
A planning firm. Not central office! This couldn't have made us HAPPIER! (Who, employed by the school system would have the qualifications to be entrusted with a project of this magnitude? Are you kidding?? The last thing we need is some "degreed construction manager" and his staff (because he WILL need staff) being hired to get on our payroll, and then we have to pay for all of their insurance and retirement benefits! Who knows, this suggested "degreed construction engineer" and his future staff would probably be tenured too and on our payroll FOREVER!! NO WAY do we want central office staff in charge of this! It's time we start doing business like successful companies do!!

Mr. Langlinais, Lafayette Parish is a hub of sorts for other smaller, adjacent parishes. Are you proposing that residents of Abbeville, Louisiana (who pay a higher tax rate to their school system than we do) pay sales tax to fund OUR school system when they shop at our mall? The residents of St. Landry parish, who travel here to see specialists in the medical field, pay sales tax on their medicines and such to fund OUR school system? How about the citizens of Iberia Parish who come to Lafayette Parish to frequent our wonderful restaurants, and Festival International pay their fare share of OUR school systems needs too?

A property tax is the most fair way for OUR citizens, who reap the benefits of OUR schools to contribute. Everyone in this parish will benefit by improving our school facilities! Businesses, and individuals look at the public school system before investing in any community! If you work, own property, or own a business in Lafayette Parish, this will benefit YOU!!!!

For the record, I DO NOT think these building improvements will have a “direct” impact and immediately raise test scores! I DO think our schools are falling apart! I DO know that most other parishes in Louisiana choose to invest in their school system at a much higher rate than we do! I DO know that OUR children are the ones suffering from these unhealthy, unsafe, over crowded buildings!! Finally I KNOW how to change it! I need to vote YES! For my son’s sake, and his health, and for all of the children in our community!

...
written by PTCParent , September 21, 2011 - 12:22 am
Quick question "And so Now," where is this information about the property tax doubling in five years?!? I want to know, because I haven't seen it anywhere! If it's true, I want to know!
...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 12:37 am
CV..i used argue with my mother in law in regards to LPSB using public school buses to bus kids to Catholic schools. Her answer always was I pay taxes just like you. Makes sense doesn't it? As far as schools in Tejas, they use the Robin Hood system. That is, the rich pay more in taxes(school tax) than the poorer areas. This money is given to the poorer areas. Used to really piss my brother in law off that while living in Plano, his money was being shipped to the Mexican border to help schools there instead of staying in Plano.

Ruth, what makes Lafayette such an attractive place for families is that what you call a laughably small tax millage rate. Well lets raise that rate to 100mills to solve the shortcomings of the LPSB. She just how high property taxes will be. Tell that to your local real estate agent. Property values are already high enough. Imagine raising them more! People will be jumping out of their McMasions second story window to commit suicide as they won't be able to afford it.
...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 12:39 am
I wonder what the Chamber of Commerces position is on this. A few short years ago, they wanted to get in bed with the LPSB instead of keeping their collective noses involved in what they should be doing. Well Rob Guidry? Where does the Chamber stand?
...
written by ElaineB , September 21, 2011 - 01:09 am
Nobody wake up "and so now..." she is obviously enjoying the delusions of her dream world. Had she attended just one of the MANY community dialogs that took place apart from the school board over the last 4 years she would know that she is grossly misinformed.

This is not a today only issue and has nothing to do with the siting school board or LPSS employees. It has to do with Lafayette being a progressive community. Its about investing in the future of our community. Its about the safety and health of our children. Its about attracting and retaining top talent with regards to our teachers. Its about improving the education of students by providing them with facilities that can support technology-after all it is the 21st century!

Like others have said before me, get the FACTS then make an INFORMED decision. Without the facts, you are missing the boat.

...
written by Unempirical Observer , September 21, 2011 - 02:34 am
One might think the Broussard Mayor will be pulling a Zachary/Baker/Central and go angling for a school district separate from LPSS. Things are always easier to manage when they are shrunken and when your population is economically more homogeneous and when the discrete area is on a growth binge with surplus wealth flying around to underwrite the expansion.
This is ONE PARISH Charlie Langlinais, we're all in this together, no more than Lafayette Parish can divorce itself from Louisiana and the ills plaguing any other area of the state.
...
written by Morrow , September 21, 2011 - 09:27 am
Hole in the donut, how about the hole in my pocket that has no more money. Its not MY fault if schools are falling. I've been paying my taxes THAT GO UP EVERY YEAR and another $500 a year I am NOT willing to pay, not even if Laf High falls tommorrow morning. The school board is responsible for this and it does not happen in 4 yrs, so don't try to slam this down my throat. Its hard for people to understand how sick the taxpayer is & how much we do not trust the school board. What about this other tax increase in 5 yrs? AND RUTH, I too have heard about raises in the future NOT FROM THIS TAX, we're not that stupid, from the revenue it frees up, that's where the raise would come from. We're also not so stupid we dont believe that could be a proposal.
...
written by Hope , September 21, 2011 - 09:32 am
Respectfully, Hole, when I heard the whispers of raises, it was suggested that would occur later, not as a result of this tax. It has built into a hope school board employees would down-the-road just a little bit, receive a salary increase that would make up for the increase in property tax in their own homes. Now THAT IS a possibility since some monies would be freed with that huge tax increase.
AND QUIT TELLING ME LAF PARISH HAS LOWER MILLAGES - WE HAVE MC MANSIONS THAT BRING MILLIONS & MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in addition to sales tax. You are absolutely NOT going to guilt the taxpayers into thinking they're not paying enough.
...
written by Hope , September 21, 2011 - 09:34 am
WHICH MAMA OR MAMAS in the newly formed PAC has children in the construction/real estate business, or maybe a vendor for an architect, WHO STANDS TO MAKE MEGA MILLIONS ON THESE DEALS???? THAT IS A LIST I'D LOVE TO SEE: the names of the members who formed this PAC.
...
written by BoFred , September 21, 2011 - 09:44 am
Will no one, surely not that rag of a local newspaper, report the truth? How much money does the school board take in yearly in sales tax and property tax? How much is for maintenance? WHAT IS THE SCHOOL BOARD DOING TO CUT/STREAM LINE their budget? NOTHING. I'd love to see a run down for the last 12 yrs, how much they took in each yr via millages & via sales tax. Don't tell me Laf or La has lower millages because I know the homes in Laf Parish have always been higher than in other parishes - even B R. Other people have mentioned it, but START SCHOOL LATER, CUT OUT THE SPECIALTY SCHOOLS, HAVE ONE CENTRAL GIFTED SCHOOL, CUT OUT THE DARNED DROP PROGRAM!!! I'll use my last breath on this planet to say "No new taxes for the school board". And I'll not be bullied or made to feel responsible for the deplorable condition of schools. I did not do it. I am sorry the education system has let these kids down, but I have paid thousands upon thousands in my lifetime to the school board. COMPARE IT TO VERMILLION PARISH which pays less tax & has a higher return, via better test scores....
...
written by BoFred , September 21, 2011 - 09:52 am
IF YOU PAY RENT, YOU WILL PAY THIS PROPERTY TAX BY WAY OF RENT INCREASES! Just remember that you renters. College students: if you rent, your rent will increase. Just because you do not own a home, you will still pay. The property owner will pass on the increase to you. Old people have not had a cost of living increase in SS in over 3 yrs & cannot afford a tax increas or a rental increase. Many people have had to cut back so much, but not the school system...SO IF 3 SCHOOLS FALL DOWN THIS AFTERNOON, I WOULD NOT BE BULLIED INTO THINKING THIS IS MY FAULT. When the drop program is dropped, when the edu system makes a real effort to streamline costs, then I might consider a small increse, but I don't think it would be necessary. It is going to be hard to find a sympathetic audience. Its not the kids, but we just don't have it, the money. And I too wonder whose going to make millions in "fees"...
...
written by BoFred , September 21, 2011 - 10:51 am
Oh, Amberlynn is winning friends & influencing people. Her insinuation I don't have a brain because I recognize this problem didn't happen in the past 4 yrs, really convinced me I should be forced to decide if I pay the utilities or have my meds refilled....
...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 10:58 am
Written by PTCparent:
A property tax is the most fair way for OUR citizens, who reap the benefits of OUR schools to contribute. Everyone in this parish will benefit by improving our school facilities! Businesses, and individuals look at the public school system before investing in any community! If you work, own property, or own a business in Lafayette Parish, this will benefit YOU!!!!

Everyone MAY benefit from it, but not EVERYONE will PAY for it with a property tax! EVERYONE will pay for it with a sales tax!
...
written by PTCParent , September 21, 2011 - 11:37 am
written by Southsider:
Everyone MAY benefit from it, but not EVERYONE will PAY for it with a property tax! EVERYONE will pay for it with a sales tax!

You are right!!! EVERYONE will be paying for it!! Including ALL of the citizens from neighboring parishes who choose to shop, dine, and see doctors here!! Not to mention our elderly parents, (mine included) who require a tremendous amount of "supplies" that are constantly purchased to keep them healthy and comfortable in their home!!

At least, with a property tax the retired community on fixed incomes are "protected" by an exemption for elderly residents in our parish! They wouldn't have that protection with a sales tax!
...
written by BoFred , September 21, 2011 - 01:08 pm
Oh, I see a referenced "board" that will take this mega fund & manage it. Are they doing it for free??? Whose overseeing spending??? How much of the mega millions will they earn over the lifetime of the millages? Who's been doing the building & maintenance for the schools that were recently built? So, we need a new board why? I KNEW there were some mamas involved who's children will make tons of cash (to send to private schools maybe). FOLLOW THE MONEY!!! You'll learn why & where the support is. Not until the day I see the LPSB earn the trust of the taxpayer by running a tight ship, cutting their budget, I will never support more property taxes. And PTC parent has just about convinced my it SHOULD be a sales tax. My own mother rents & her rent will go up, so she has no protection. I'd rather help support her than give more money in property taxes!
...
written by Mo , September 21, 2011 - 01:16 pm
Mayor Langlinais. Many do not like what he has to say, but I don't see anyone telling him he's wrong. GO ON MAYOR LANGLINAIS! MAYBE YOU CAN FIND OUT HOW MUCH THE LPSB's collections have grown in the past 15 yrs. I don't think you'll be able ascertain what they did with it.... While, when I drive through Broussard, I CAN SEE WHAT YOU'VE DONE WITH YOURS! Who do you think will be collecting those planning & construction fees Mayor? THE TRUTH IS SOMEONE STANDS TO MAKE MONEY THAT WILL MAKE Gachassin's consulting fees look like chump-change, and a large pro-property tax advocacy will benefit financially. PLEASE KEEP US INFORMED MAYOR LANGLINAIS!
...
written by MollyBloom , September 21, 2011 - 01:24 pm
I am an advocate for this millage to improve the school facilities in Lafayette Parish because I know the facts. I have attended every school board meeting for more than a year, even though I do not have any affiliation with LPSS. I know the problems with the board and the staff; that's why I spend at least three hours of my live -- every two weeks -- to sit there and listen. I also spend lots of time reading the actual language of things, like the actual terms of the ballot referendum that cleary and unequivocably states that -- by law -- this money cannot be used for any other purpose than for facility construction and maintenance. I also know that the League of Women Voters video was produced by independent citizens with nary a contractor among the group because I was part of that group. I also understand -- as apparently many of the naysayers do not -- how the schools are funded, which is through a minimum foundation formula. (I suggest you no-nothing look that up.) The funding that comes to us is determined by the legislature, which also specifies how those funds can be spent. 70% MUST be spent on curriculum and instruction; the remaining 30% must cover EVERYTHING else, including wages and benefits (insurance, retirement, etc.), transportation (including for getting non-public school students to their private schools), custodial, yada yada yada. There is absolutely NO line item dedicated to construction and maintenance. This millage will construct such a line item that will by mandated, with the force of law, to only cover construction and maintenance. As to the millage itself, I find the objections laughable. Businesses will shoulder a good part of the burden and it will be good for them in the long run because a well educated community spends more. Every one with a brain in their head can understand that. The rest of us are paying the lowest taxes in 50 years. Despite all the noise to the contrary, the facts are the facts. And here's an example of how it will break down for individual homeowners: If you home's ASSESSED value is $150,000 -- the average in Lafayette -- you will pay approximately $16 more per month. Now, to break that down even further, it means either one pack of cigarettes or one CC's coffee (depending on your lifestyle) every week. If we cannot afford this for the betterment of our entire community and our future within the region, than we are beyond hope. I encourage all of you to tour the schools or at least to watch the video. You will be appalled, as I am, I can assure you. To think that a community like Lafayette -- the third wealthiest school district in the state of Louisiana -- allows our schools to continue in such a state should be an embarrassment to all of us. Especially to the gossip mongers who spout "rumors" and untruths about how the millage will double in five years (it absolutely will not!), that the money will go to benefit contractors and builders (that's why we need a third-party management firm so that we can hold costs down by keeping cronyism off the table!) and that teachers will get special raises (the meanest rumor of all and I challenge anyone to show the slightest evidence of this!). So, go ahead, vote against this, all you small-minded, pig-headed, selfish "citizens." You know who you are!
...
written by Leslie Davis , September 21, 2011 - 01:32 pm
I am a parent, with no ties to LPSS or politics. I have been involved with the parents working long hours to do better for our children... all we are asking is that you get informed. Go to the web site. Visit the schools. Keep in mind that as the wealthiest parish, we get less money per student with the state formula. Keep in mind that federal and state dollars can NOT be used for facilities. And ask yourself, Southsider, how are we going to attract new residents and new businesses with school buildings that are horrific? How are we going to attract the best teachers?

We pride ourselves on being the best in the state--fiber to the home, LITE Center, UL, etc. When we don't put our money where our mouth is, as 49th out of 69 parishes, then we all lose. The property millage for schools has not increased since 1965! We're talking about an average of $16 a month.

And BoFred, you are suggesting we cut out all the enrichment activities that make our schools stand out. Do you want to be like Baton Rouge, where they have no choice but to send their kids to private school? Lafayette is home of the creative class... let's support that!
...
written by Cajun Girl , September 21, 2011 - 01:50 pm
I am disappointed that so many people are opposed to this tax. I am further saddened that Mayor Langlinais does not know the facts and disseminates hearsay. As a leader, he should educate himself on the facts of the proposition, and then give his opinion. Furthermore, if he has not found one LPSS employee who supports the tax, then he hasn’t looked very hard.
I have no agenda other than trying to educate my children in the LPSS. Clearly every parent should want what is best for their child. And if that is wanting good schools and adequate facilities, then so be it.
By not supporting this tax, you are choosing to not provide a future for the children of Lafayette which will have economic implication of the City of Lafayette. I am tired of everyone complaining about the past. So what - bad choices may have been made in the past. The question is what are you going to do about the future? Sit and complain or make a difference?
I truly encourage everyone to get the facts. Have an opinion, but at least have an educated opinion.

...
written by Eye Kia , September 21, 2011 - 01:58 pm
If you want progress, denationalized the public schools. Education is an ambiguous process best left to private means.
...
written by And so now... , September 21, 2011 - 02:18 pm
We are able to see the same people writing in, who have never written in before, all of a sudden saying the same thing over and over under many different nom de plumes. As I said, the push to make this tax palatable will increase the closer we get to election day. This tax is b.s. and will not pass. The people of this parish are good people but they are not stupid people. Excellent reference to Vermilion Parish in a previous posting. They paid much less and get much more for their children. Post and push all you want, this tax is doomed outta the box.
...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 02:47 pm
Pasted:
I am a parent, with no ties to LPSS or politics. I have been involved with the parents working long hours to do better for our children... all we are asking is that you get informed. Go to the web site. Visit the schools. Keep in mind that as the wealthiest parish, we get less money per student with the state formula. Keep in mind that federal and state dollars can NOT be used for facilities. And ask yourself, Southsider, how are we going to attract new residents and new businesses with school buildings that are horrific? How are we going to attract the best teachers?
----------------------------------------------------------
I would say that Lafayette's economy is doing quite well for itself, even with the horrific conditions NOW of the schools, wouldn't you agree? I see many houses being built, I see many BMW's, Mercedes, Cadillacs, i see the restaurants full, etc. And i though we already had the best teachers, no?



We pride ourselves on being the best in the state--fiber to the home, LITE Center, UL, etc. When we don't put our money where our mouth is, as 49th out of 69 parishes, then we all lose. The property millage for schools has not increased since 1965! We're talking about an average of $16 a month.

Your assuming i have a house appraised at $150k. I don't. My house is 3 times that. So using the rates to the best of my ability, as to make it simple, i will pay $800-$1000 a year MINIMUM. I plan on living at least 20 more years, and we all know that property values won't go down, so the rate will increase. So, for my $18,000 MINIMUM, what and how is it going to be a benefit to me? What do i get for $20k. I agree that we need to fix,repair and build new schools if necessary. My problem is how to pay for it all.


...
written by Angie Simoneaux, LPSS Spokeswoman , September 21, 2011 - 04:13 pm
Actually, there is absolutely no mechanism to "double" or change the amount of the tax in any way in 5 years or any other time frame. It is 23 mills for the master plan and 2 mills for maintenance. But don't take my word for it, read the prop yourself here: http://esbstaff.lpssonline.com...7021fa.pdf

In that prop, you will find language that dedicates the tax to the master plan, and gives the citizens' oversight committee its authority.

Also, the master plan includes seven new schools and dozens of projects which will result in the removal of a significant number of our portable classrooms, not just three new schools. But don't take my word for it, take a look at the master plan here: http://lpss.csrsonline.com

Want some actual facts on spending? Only four districts of the 70 in Louisiana spend LESS on administration than LPSS. Our central office costs are less than HALF the state average. Our property tax support to our school system is 49th out of 69 in the state. All of these facts are available on the state department's website, in their annual financial reports. But again, don’t take my word for it, look here: http://www.doe.state.la.us/div..._data.html

Want to know what the school board's budget looks like? You can see them (going back to 2002) here: http://www.lpssonline.com/site342.php Don’t let someone tell you how the money is spent; go read it for yourself.

You could also read our annual financial reports here: http://www.lpssonline.com/site338.php

Don't take my word for it, get the facts for yourself.

...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 05:35 pm
Angie...as the spokesperson for LPSS, how much land does the LPSS own and what is its fair market value. I don't mean school land, i mean other land, such as the land being leased to Logan's Roadhouse, etc.

...
written by Mo , September 21, 2011 - 06:24 pm
Mollybloom & Leslie Davis: I don't want to know about federal dollars & how they're spent. I want to know what the LPSS does with the property taxes I pay every yr that has gone up every year for 17 yrs. There are a # of millages for them on my tax bill - several. What does the state legislature have to do with those monies? What happens to the parish sales tax that is collected in the name of the school board every month? The TRUTH is the money has been there every year & the school board has chosen to ignore the maintenance of the buildings. The TRUTH is NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT BRINGING COSTS DOWN: like the drop system, starting school later in the year, etc. THE TRUTH IS THE LPSB HAS COLLECTED RECORD AMOUNTS OF MONEY EA YEAR FOR AT LEAST 17 YRS. And the truth is I will spend my last breath fighting more taxes for the school board. Maybe ya'll could start a fund & all you people who want to pay more could contribute to that fund. $16 a month is nearly $400 for me. NO NO NO that's on top of the nearly $1300 a yr I already paying property taxes & you want it just for the school board! YOU WILL NOT GUILT ME INTO THINKING I SHOULD PAY MORE! Get with the school board & find a way to do this a little at a time & PAY ALONG THE WAY!
...
written by ElaineB , September 21, 2011 - 06:26 pm
Funny how the opposition resorts to attacking individuals. Would be nice to see just one of them use actual FACTS and not just made up nonsense.

And really, you don't care if the schools actually fall down around the students? How much do you think your taxes will go up when the lawsuits start pouring in?


...
written by More to the point , September 21, 2011 - 06:30 pm
More to the point: How much does the LPSB's "mouth" get paid a yr to try to sucker us into the poor house? What are her benefits & salary? Why would the school board need a PR person to begin with? Why has the school board waited this long, been negligent in its duties to maintain facilities? Why can't projects be done & paid for as they're done? This whole property tax thing sucks, and it sucks for the kids, but it didn't happen yesterday and it won't get fixed tomorrow, or in Oct either.
...
written by ALL CAPS IZ KEWL , September 21, 2011 - 07:32 pm
STILL NO REAL FACTUAL BASIS FROM THE OPPOSITION?? THAT'S CODE FOR RUNNING SCARED. NOT ONLY WILL THE BOND PASS, IT WILL BE A SLAM DUNK LANDSLIDE AND I WILL BE LAUGHING ALL THE WAY BACK TO MY MCMANSION!
...
written by Angie Simoneaux, LPSS Spokeswoman , September 21, 2011 - 08:42 pm
Southsider, the property LPSS has use of that is not being used for schools is all Section 16 property. We can't sell that. But we can lease it, which is what we do with Logan's lot. We don't do regular valuations of these properties, because we don't own it. the state owns them... i hope this answers your question!
...
written by Southsider , September 21, 2011 - 08:59 pm
Thank you so much for the info Angie
...
written by x , September 22, 2011 - 12:02 am
Please get all the facts about the property tax. We are in need of these new schools that will be built if the tax passes. Research and watch the videos of the conditions of the schools that many children attend daily. Our children and teachers deserve to learn and work in better conditons.
...
written by More to the point , September 22, 2011 - 01:28 am
More to the point: Comeaux HS has needed a new wing since the 1980s. What the brother in law doesn't rent them to the school board anymore? He's in construction now, as in building schools? What about the school that had to have hundreds of thousands of dollars spent to clean up that newly built school? Remember those architects? Those builders? I'm real glad for ALL CAPS & that additional taxes on his McMansion won't affect him in the least. I'm also glad to see he cares about the poor & hurting in his community too. Where were these concerned citizens 10 yrs ago when the schools also needed maintenance? the school board has been negligent but its had the money to do its job. I'm just not willing to give more; I can't afford more, but I guess that doesn't matter to some of the enlightened who support this.
...
written by Southsider , September 22, 2011 - 01:39 am
Ruth, Molly and all the other pro-tax proponents: I took Angies advice and read the proposal. You say the tax will not double in 5 years? Please, reread the proposal. The tax of 23mill is ONLY for Phase 1 on the project, NOT the whole project. An additional tax will be needed or the tax will i guess 'rollover' for an additional length of time to pay for Phase 2. Yes, lets get the whole truth out to make an educated decision. While i doubt i live another 40 years, I have no intention of being taxed to the poor house for the time i do have on this planet due to the poor financial matters of the LPSS, caused by the LPSS. I don't need to watch the videos as i am well aware of the conditions of the schools my kids have and are attending due to my wife and I volunteering our time and money to them.
...
written by ALL CAPS IZ KEWL , September 22, 2011 - 02:24 am
SOUTHSIDER, YOU ARE MISUNDERSTANDING THE WORDING AND THE WAY BONDS WORK WHICH SEEMS TO BE A COMMON PROBLEM. (THIS IS NOT A DIG AT YOU) IT WILL HELP IF YOU SPEAK TO AN EXPERT ON THE SUBJECT AND HAVE THEM EXPLAIN IT TO YOU. IT CAN BE CONFUSING.
...
written by Middle of the Road , September 22, 2011 - 02:33 am
The Propositon clearly states funds will be DEDICATED to building new facilities. The School Board cannot mess with the money.
Quality schools IMPROVE property values greatly.
(1) Compare the costs: Tx - In Katy a home w/an assessed value of $150,000, would pay $2,289.90 /yr. to the school system. In Spring it's $2,190.00/ yr. for schools. In Laf. Parish - w/a home assessed at $150,000 less the homestead you pay $247.50 / yr! If this bond passes, you will pay $435.00 / yr. to the schools - an increase of only $15.63 / month! 7 schools rebuilt, 5 schools w/wing additions,and all 36 other schools will get dollars for deferred maintenance.
(2) Compare the conditions:
(a) tin, rusty buildings with window unit a/c's that have to be unplugged for computers, or dehumidifiers, or to lower noise level.
(b) Mold
(c) No covered walkways. Children soaked in rain.
(d) Children have to go to main building for lunch and for ANY water. They line up for rest rooms.
(e) In case of storms, they have to come inside from dangerous
tin buildings and huddle in hallways of old brick building.
(f) Student population of Lafayette High is ONE THOUSAND higher than what it was built to educate. That's a lot of people. No new
rest rooms.
(3) Lower class size always improves educational quality. But the state cuts have been forcing teacher layoffs. The state cuts teachers and increases class sizes.
(4) The school board has been shifting money from Capital improvements to Operating funds. That left the buildings to rot.
(4) Citizen watchdogs insisted that the Proposition require the money to be DEDICATED to the improved facilities. (See list above.)
(5) Whoever allowed this to happen should be ashamed.
(6) Whoever allows this to continue should be ashamed.
(7) No matter what happened in the past, we deserve a better future.
(8) Vote YES.
...
written by Middle of the Road , September 22, 2011 - 02:34 am
The Propositon clearly states funds will be DEDICATED to building new facilities. The School Board cannot mess with the money.
Quality schools IMPROVE property values greatly.
(1) Compare the costs: Tx - In Katy a home w/an assessed value of $150,000, would pay $2,289.90 /yr. to the school system. In Spring it's $2,190.00/ yr. for schools. In Laf. Parish - w/a home assessed at $150,000 less the homestead you pay $247.50 / yr! If this bond passes, you will pay $435.00 / yr. to the schools - an increase of only $15.63 / month! 7 schools rebuilt, 5 schools w/wing additions,and all 36 other schools will get dollars for deferred maintenance.
(2) Compare the conditions:
(a) tin, rusty buildings with window unit a/c's that have to be unplugged for computers, or dehumidifiers, or to lower noise level.
(b) Mold
(c) No covered walkways. Children soaked in rain.
(d) Children have to go to main building for lunch and for ANY water. They line up for rest rooms.
(e) In case of storms, they have to come inside from dangerous
tin buildings and huddle in hallways of old brick building.
(f) Student population of Lafayette High is ONE THOUSAND higher than what it was built to educate. That's a lot of people. No new
rest rooms.
(3) Lower class size always improves educational quality. But the state cuts have been forcing teacher layoffs. The state cuts teachers and increases class sizes.
(4) The school board has been shifting money from Capital improvements to Operating funds. That left the buildings to rot.
(4) Citizen watchdogs insisted that the Proposition require the money to be DEDICATED to the improved facilities. (See list above.)
(5) Whoever allowed this to happen should be ashamed.
(6) Whoever allows this to continue should be ashamed.
(7) No matter what happened in the past, we deserve a better future.
(8) Vote YES.
...
written by ALL CAPS IZ KEWL , September 22, 2011 - 02:34 am
YOU'RE ALSO MISSING THE POINT OF THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE WHICH IS COMPRISED OF VOLUNTEERS FROM THE COMMUNITY-PARENTS, BUSINESS OWNERS, TEACHERS, ETC. IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE HANDLING OF THE MONEY, THEN STEP UP AND BECOME A MEMBER OF THIS COMMITTEE OR AT LEAST ATTEND SOME OF THE MEETINGS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS GROUP IS TO MAKE SURE THE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS DON'T MAKE THE SAME MISTAKES AS THEIR PREDECESSORS.

ITS EASY TO SIT BACK AND CRITICIZE HOW MONEY HAS BEEN MISHANDLED. DID YOU ATTEND ANY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET MEETINGS? THEY ARE BURDENED WITH THE TASK OF FILLING IN GAPS LEFT BY CUTS FROM THE STATE AS WELL AS UNFUNDED MANDATES. DID YOU KNOW THAT OUR TRANSPORTATION COSTS MORE THAN TRIPLED AS A RESULT OF THE DESEG LAWSUIT? THAT MONEY HAD TO BE TAKEN FROM SOMEWHERE. INSTEAD OF CRITICIZING FROM YOUR ARMCHAIR, PERHAPS YOU COULD OFFER BETTER OPTIONS.

...
written by ragin_cajun , September 22, 2011 - 03:21 am
Angie Simoneaux --

Thanks for pointing us to the facts. I'm sure we all appreciate your help in understanding this, and your familiarity with the facts.

You wrote that "our property tax support to our school system is 49th out of 69 in the state." Does that mean that LPSS ranks that low in expenditure per pupil, too? Where does Lafayette Parish rank among the other parishes in the state in expenditure per pupil?

With such a low property tax contribution to LPSS, are there any other taxes that LPSS collects that other school systems in the state don't collect? For example, do other school systems also levy a sales tax like LPSS does? And where does Lafayette rank in TOTAL tax support to LPSS.


Because as I look at the facts, what I see is that LPSS, with its "low" tax support, spends about the same per pupil as other school systems in the state. How can that be?

Thanks...



...
written by ragin_cajun , September 22, 2011 - 03:31 am
Angie Simoneaux --

Looking further at "the facts", I find that Lafayette Parish currently ranks 19, in the top 3rd, of parishes in "Local Revenue per Pupil"--and dead last in "State Revenue per Pupil". So how does that square with your "49th of 69" in property tax support? What makes up the difference?

And why are we dead last in support from State Government?

Thanks...
...
written by Southsider , September 22, 2011 - 11:23 am
Caps...i think i understand it. Phase 1, 23 mills...Phase 2, 23 mills...no? with 2 mill for maintenance
...
written by Southsider , September 22, 2011 - 11:48 am
RC..it was reported yesterday on TV3 website:

Here is a list of the Acadiana parishes which spent the most per pupil in 2010:

PARISH Per Pupil Expenditure
1. ST MARY 10, 2901
2. JEFF DAVIS 10, 252
3. LAFAYETTE 10, 198
4. EVANGELINE PARISH 9,778
5. IBERIA PARISH 9,606
6. ST LANDRY 9, 550
7. VERMILION 9,418
8. ACADIA PARISH 9,281
9. ST MARTIN 9, 163

State Average $10,622

Here is the list of the student's performance rankings:

PARISH District Performance Score
1. JEFF DAVIS 107.3
2. VERMILION 100.5
3. LAFEYTTE 96.5
4. IBERIA PARISH 95.1
5. ST MARY 94.3
6. EVANGELINE 91.6
7. ACADIA 90.6
8. ST LANDRY 88.4
9. ST MARTIN 87.3


...
written by Morrow , September 22, 2011 - 12:11 pm
OH MY GOD, IBERIA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD IS NOT INCREASING THEIR PROPERTY TAXES !!! HOW WILL THEY MANAGE???? How will they maintain their buildings??? How can a parish so near us operate a whole school year without taking more money from property owners???

I WONDER IF ITS BECAUSE THEY'VE MAINTAINED THEM THRU THE YRS?



...
written by Morrow , September 22, 2011 - 12:17 pm
I think I've figured it out, the real reason for a HUGE property tax, the real reason the LPSB wants hundreds of millions, A FREAKING BILLION, dollars. If all those dollars are used for construction & maintenance, it means hundreds or millions of $, over a billion $ will be freed up in the general fund. Then LPSB can play for years and years on your dollars not ever having to control themselves or their spending! WHEN YOU FREE A BILLION DOLLARS, ITS NOT SO HARD TO BELIEVE A PERSONNEL PAYROL INCREASE isn't the motivation that is keeping so many Laf parish school personnel quiet.... As to rumors, usually, "where there's smoke, there's fire". Is anyone willing to legislate that freed up money that will be available in the general fund WILL NOT GO TO PAY INCREASES OR BENEFITS??? MAYBE THE PLAN IS TO PUT IT IN EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS OR RETIREMENT..... but you can bet there are plans for that freed up money.
...
written by holeinthedonut8 , September 22, 2011 - 12:50 pm
Those of you who most adamant about a NO NEW TAX. What's your solution to the decline in business that will result in increasing poorer schools? What's your plan for the devaluing of your property values when the school values crash? What's your plan for demonstrating that this community has more to offer than music and food.

Dont pass this-your anger will not subside, but your future will be bleaker-that's guaranteed, absolutely for sure.

WHAT IS YOUR PLAN if your against????
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 22, 2011 - 01:01 pm
"I WONDER IF ITS BECAUSE THEY'VE MAINTAINED THEM THRU THE YRS? "

That is exactly it. They have a steady and consistent school construction plan, they have been building a new school or two over there for years, and they do a much better job of presenting the project and the tax proposal to the voters.

LPSB should take some notes next time they see them at a conference.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 22, 2011 - 02:53 pm
holeinthedonut8 --

"WHAT IS YOUR PLAN if your against???? "

I described it in my comment to hope over here....http://www.theind.com/lead-news/9049-dearth-a-taxes

Basically, my suggestion would be for LPSB to do this the way that Iberia Parish School Board did it. A small tax increase, a few schools at a time, millage renews every two years so voters can renew it if LPSB does a good job with it, or not renew it if LPSB botches the project.

That way, schools get built IF LPSB does it right, taxpayers are protected if LPSB drops the ball, the building project is easier to manage because it is smaller. You know, small consistent incremental change over time.
...
written by Morrow , September 22, 2011 - 06:16 pm
ragin_cajun, I really believe the need for the huge amount is a smoke & mirrors ploy. I just didn't understand why all of a sudden, all at once, so very much money, and then again, that much more in such a little time. I now absoulutely believe now the small amount would not free up enough money from the general fund to accomplish what is probably the real motivation for all that money. A little at a time would not allow for additional personnel raises because there wouldn't be enough money taken out of general operating expenses. I believe the plan is that ALL maintenance expenses be used from that maintenance millage. So all maintenance payroll expenses, all supplies & equipment used for maintenance and maybe the support of maintenance buildings too would come from that big fat account. Then hundreds of millions of dollars will be freed up in the general fund - the money USED NOW to pay those people & provide for all that equipment. Not just the maintenance for those 7 schools, but for ALL schools in Lafayette parish. Its the only situation that makes sense to me. You let schools go unmaintained for years, when the tax money is available for that maintenance, & then say ALL OF LAFAYETTE PARISH IS FALLING DOWN! ragin, something stinks very badly about this enormous tax proposal & the rabid rants of a few people about the sky falling....
...
written by Pedro , September 22, 2011 - 06:59 pm
I have a couple of questions...
1.) Why must the LPSB hire consultants(and pay them millions) each time money is involved?
2.) If the LPSS central office staff are not performing their job duties why do we continue to pay them?
3.) Why would the citizens of Lafayette give the LPSB more money(to pay consultants)?
4.) Why do we (citizens of Lafayette) continue to elect LPSB members unable to "break the cycle" of LPSB/LPSS politics?
5.) Has every single penny in the last approved "teacher raise" tax been spent on classroom teachers? Show me.

Showing me video of the schools my children attend does not make me want to "throw more money" at a system with no accountability.

What our children deserve is a community invested enough in public education to demand accountability from our elected (paid) LPSB members and LPSS administration.

...
written by ragin_cajun , September 22, 2011 - 11:02 pm
Morrow--

Youre right, something DOES stink about all this.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 23, 2011 - 01:18 pm
Angie Simoneaux --

Section 10 of the proposal states that "the Governing Authority anticipates that it may pay a portion of the costs of the projects from the General Fund"

So this whole thing starts off with LPSS borrowing from the General Fund to pay some costs for the project, and then repaying that money back when the bond revenue comes in?

For LPSS, with the history it has of robbing Peter to pay Paul, to start off a HUGE construction project with an accounting "maneuver" like that does not inspire much confidence.

I'm glad I read the prop. Thanks for posting a link to it.
...
written by the original northsidian , September 23, 2011 - 01:58 pm
Ruth T.: Not enough money to maintain the schools? But enough money to put bus drivers on the drop program? And enough money to rehire someone a day after they retire? Come-on, give me a break!!!
...
written by Hope , October 09, 2011 - 02:11 pm
I read how the proposition reads & its vague so as to allow for maintenance of ALL schools in Laf parish. It allows for building of "maintenance" building, you know, to house the new equipment LPSB is gonna buy with this windfall. Gonna need storage bldgs for the new mowers, parking lots for the maintenance employees vehicles... etc. Gonna need millions to pay those employees, and furnish schools, in addition to building & replacing schls. This is a sneaky misrepresentation of what LPSB really wants to do, take all maintenace, & employees out of the GENERAL FUND. I knew in my heart, school employees were being too quiet about this increase in property taxes, this rape of the Laf property owner.
...
written by Sam's Mom , October 10, 2011 - 05:11 am
LPSS/LPSB employees were not being quiet about this! They held countless public forums for the issue to be discussed. Had you attended just one, then you might understand the truth of what is going on.

Our schools are literally crumbling around our students and teachers. This bond offers a smart and immediate solution to an enormous problem facing our community.

Did you know that the schools will all be open this Monday at 6pm? Go tour a couple and see for your self. We need to work together to see positive change in our town. We can't keep playing the blame game.


...
written by Morrow , October 16, 2011 - 11:59 am
So I heard the pic in the daily rag, the pic of the mold, is in a little used storage room. Makes for good press though, to fool the public into thinking this is in all of our schools. This tax prop will cripple some businesses, hurt the overall economy, put undue burden on property owners, hurt those who rent, etc. The only people who will benefit are the consultants, the architects, the construction co., the vendors in construction industry, and the school system employees who will see a big raise in a few years! There are several ways to get around the "dedication" & no one is saying what the plan is for freed up money. No one will legislate that money won't go into employee pockets. A lot of people are scared of this tax proposition & how harsh it is. A lot of people are in for a shock when the tax bill comes in, the house note goes up or the rents go up...
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it