News -> INDReporter MON, OCT 3 7:40AM by Walter Pierce

Chamber issues endorsements, passes on some races

The Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce’s political action committee, Empower PAC, has issued endorsements in races that will appear on ballots in Lafayette Parish on Oct. 22, throwing its weight behind several candidates who are running unopposed and declining to make an endorsement in a handful of other races.

The chamber is endorsing Sen. Fred Mills (22nd District), state Rep. Page Cortez (23rd), Elbert Lee Guillory (24th) and Jonathan Perry (26th) in state Senate races. Among those candidates, only Guillory has a competitor on election day.

In the state House of Representatives races, the GLCC endorses incumbent Rep. Nancy Landry in District 31,  Jack Montoucet (42), Rickey Hardy (44), Joel Robideaux (45), Stuart Bishop (43), Don Menard (39) and Taylor Barras (48). Landry, Bishop and Barras are running unopposed.

The chamber is also endorsing Holly Boffy for the District 7 seat on the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and City-Parish President Joey Durel for a third term.

On the Lafayette City-Parish Council, the PAC is backing incumbents Sam Dore (District 6), Don Bertrand (7) and Keith Patin (8). However, the business group has endorsed challengers Britt Latiolais in District 5 over incumbent Jared Bellard and Walter Campbell in 9 over William Theriot. Bellard and Theriot are the CPC’s most fiscally conservative members.

The chamber’s PAC is not taking positions in the races for the newly created House District 96 and in BESE District 8.

Curiously, the chamber also declined to issue an endorsement in District 1 in northwest Lafayette Parish where three political newcomers are vying for the post and in District 3 where scandal-plagued incumbent Councilman Brandon Shelvin is facing a credible challenge from Carencro City Manager Lloyd Rochon.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (23)add
...
written by historyonyx , October 03, 2011 - 02:12 pm
Nothing "curious" about the neglect of Upper Lafayette. The plan is simply to exploit us for profit so it really doesn't matter who's in office. Shelvin has helped that along. I don't find anybody who will vote for Shelvin. Worse than useless!
...
written by Compassionate One , October 03, 2011 - 02:20 pm
Rubber Stamps/YES Men/Puppets for Liberal Chamber of Commerce:

Don Bertrand
Keith Patin
Sam Dore'
Britt Latiolais
Walter Campbell

Independant:

Jared Bellard
William Theriot


"Bellard and Theriot are the CPC’s most fiscally conservative members."


...
written by RCajunrunner , October 03, 2011 - 06:29 pm
Maybe someone should inform the Lafayette Chamber that while they endorsed the incumbent (Montoucet) in the State Rep District 42 race, his challenger, Anthony Emmongs, has received pretty much all the other business endorsements: LOGA, LABI, NFIB, Pelican ABC and the Homebuilders Association.
...
written by RCajunrunner , October 03, 2011 - 06:30 pm
Correction for typo: Anthony EMMONS
...
written by Downtowner , October 03, 2011 - 06:50 pm
Remember Bellard and Theriot both voted against police recommendations to make downtown Lafayette safe. These 2 wizards have no background in Law enforcement, but know it all? We can do better. Vote for Latiolais and Campbell.
...
written by Boudin Boy , October 03, 2011 - 07:21 pm
Don't know about Bellard but Theriot does what the people who elected him want him to do. Campbell is just another lap dog for Joey Durel & co. and Campbell has never served in public office. He is a doing nothing bought and paid for by Durel, Conque, and the Lafayette Chamber. A truly said state of affairs when we are relegated to have that krewe of miscreants tell us who we should vote for.
...
written by historyonyx , October 03, 2011 - 09:59 pm
Downtown: please explain. Are you referring to anything about bars paying extra money? or what? Bc residents didn't like that downtown bc it didn't help them at all. Please tell us...
...
written by ben , October 03, 2011 - 11:41 pm
The Chamber lost 100% of the last eletions when the School Board ran. I think they will win some this time. I think some of our incumbents did a good job and I will vote for them again. But not the ones who try to raise taxes every chance they get. I'll vote for Cortez and Theriot and Landry, but not for Durel. He is always trying to tax Lafayette. Iwish he would go run some where else so we wouldn't have to watch his sneaky moves that he tries to pool all the time.
...
written by Morrow , October 04, 2011 - 01:45 pm
Well, now silly me, I thought Downtown Laf. IS safe. That's what the Chief has been telling us... Esp since all those police officers are being paid those big bucks in security work... they just can't pass up those big dollars. I vote for fiscal responsibility, not taxing the voters to the point of pain. I respect the Theriot & Bellard and some others for trying to rein in the others. This city is just getting to expensive to live in, esp since we're not getting our money's worth. I absolutely disagree with the Redflex expediture, which has again turned into a money pit for the administration & retired police officers!
...
written by Morrow , October 04, 2011 - 01:48 pm
The Chamber is losing a lot of respect in the business commuity regarding political issues. I believe the public is recognizing The Chamber is a good reference for businesses, but when it comes to fiscal issues/fiscal responsibility, The Chamber is a lap dog for liberal politicians. I am especially disappointed on how quiet The Chamber is regarding this tax rape the LPSB is trying to inflict upon business owners and property owners.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 05, 2011 - 03:07 am
I think I have discovered a solution to satisfy everyone and still have JOEY DONUTTIN, and SHAKY SHELVIN in office,we redistrict the parish, and make river ranch into two districts in itself, elect Joey Donuttin as the President of the south district and elect Shaky Shelvin as the president of the north district and in a couple of weeks the two would have either each stolen all they and their cronys & sponsors could tote off, or they would kiss each others ass... and screw their cronys and their sponsors big time, outta all the cookies. Am I Right, Are Am I Correct .
You can book this. Anon
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 05, 2011 - 03:18 am
OOOps ! I forgot the finale....of the division of River Ranch, the conclusion of the solution for now.
Joey Do`nuttin and Shaky Shel`vin merge, " das right, they consolidate, and they rename River Ranch,
can I have a " TOOT TOOT heah, " $HAKY-NUTTIN WORLD, LLC.

TBC, at an appropiate date
...
written by Zachary Barker , October 05, 2011 - 07:27 pm
I understand the Chamber believes it is their role to make endorsements, however, I must say that any organization representing a multitude of varied opinions from the masses should shy from any formal endorsements without an approved format from their constituency. Example: At least a 2/3 majority, with a minimum # of votes. Otherwise, say nothing.

It is challenging to be the voice of a group, when your scope of influence is your voice with your assumptions and/or opinions.

What should be done by the Chamber is to host debates and forums for the business community to learn more about their potential representation, as well as have a chance to question them on their action plans.

It is high time our city, parish, state and nation stop allowing "leaders" to talk about what we believe in, hoping the people that we elect will fairly represent us. It is time for us to have leadership that understands their role is to listen, then lead with defined action plans and accountability measures. Our leaderships must become servants to the people again, not dictators of their beliefs and values.

In an election, won by 53%, there is 47% (a near majority) which is NOT interested in your party-centric values.

LEADERSHIP IS SERVICE. Maybe we should start electing for such... (and reporting should do the same!)

Frustratedly hopeful,
Zachary Barker
...
written by Compassionate One , October 05, 2011 - 09:00 pm
Good post Zach. Four years ago, they DID host forums which were well attended and televised.

Since then the leadership has formed their Political Action Committee and chosen who to endorse. MORE POWER that way in the leadership and less in the citizens knowledge of the issues.

Your post is on the money. Leadership should be service, and not self-service. Shame on you Rob Guidry and Bruce Conque, et al.
...
written by the original northsidian , October 05, 2011 - 09:32 pm
Fella's you are talking about a bunch of eunuch's!!

NO MORE TAXES!! GOV'T PENSION REFORM, NOW!!
...
written by Hope , October 09, 2011 - 03:57 am
I read the tax proposition on the ballot. The wording is vague as to how this money will be delegated. It well says the maintenance & equipment & furnishing, so MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WILL BE FREED UP FOR THE LPSB TO P AWAY. If the voters of Laf Parish do not vote against this prop tax rape, hundreds of millions will be spent without responsibility & the local economy will be destroyed.
...
written by Hope , October 09, 2011 - 04:01 am
Shame on the Chamber of Commerce's cowardice. That group knows the business community will be hurt economically WHEN BUSINESS & RENTAL PROPERTY TAXES DOUBLE and it absolutely should be speaking out against it. Now I know, the Laf Chamber of Commerce is a gimmick, a political farce & cares not a whit about what is economically good for local business. Belonging to the Laf Chamber of Commerce could actually hurt a business' reputation.
...
written by 101 , October 10, 2011 - 04:56 am
Good public schools are the foundation of our community. But our schools need help — today.

Our public schools prepare our children to be successful adults and citizens. They are the heart of our neighborhoods, supporting and protecting property values.

You can’t have great students without great teachers and buildings that support both.Lafayette’s public schools are in dire need of major repairs and some need to be completely rebuilt.

Over half of our school buildings are over 50 years of age with little to no renovations - only band-aids. Thanks to years of tight budgets, many are crumbling, don’t have adequate electrical capacity or proper air ventilation and simply don’t support 21st century learning.

The bond proposition for Lafayette Parish’s Public Schools will make critical repairs to increase safety and update classrooms, cafeterias, libraries, etc. in many of our worst schools. It will also rebuild or replace schools in most immediate need across our district. ALL schools will see some funding for their facility needs in this bond proposition!
...
written by Hope , October 10, 2011 - 02:41 pm
Milton Elem is in good shape because its kept up. Youngsville Elem is in good shape because its been kept up. Broadmoor Elem is in good shape because maintenance is done. Some schools have intentionally been neglected. Laf High is FILTHY on the outside. A good housewashing machine could take care of that and a lawnmower would improve the yard @ Laf High. But cleaning wasn't in "the plan" to convince voters to rape the business owners & property owners of the parish. Some schools have intentionally been let to run down. Comeaux High has had butler buildings & could have had wings built since the 70s. Don't ask me for more of my hard earned money. Start school in Sept & save millions right there! Close down the specialty schools & save millions more. There are trade schools & community colleges for that. I will neve support paying more property taxes, esp since they already go UP eve year. This tax proposal is a sham intended to fool the taxpayers.
...
written by 101 , October 11, 2011 - 03:55 am
Hope-your repeated use of the word "rape" is insensitive and offensive. I pray that you, your wife, daughter, son, mother, father, never experience the true devastation caused by this horrible act.
Have your opinion but please keep the theatrics to a minimum.
...
written by Compassionate One , October 11, 2011 - 11:49 pm
Hey 101---Give you political correctness a rest.

Hope could substitute SCREWED and be right on the money!

And I'm very sensitive, I'm the Compassionate One!
...
written by Hope , October 13, 2011 - 05:42 pm
101, I'm sorry & you do have a point. I do not mean to be insensitive to anyone who has been hurt or a victim. I totally regret using the word. I do have very strong feelings against this tax prop because frankly, it will be a significant financial burden on my household. Thank you Compassionate One for providing me with a more appropriate term for how I feel I have been treated as a property owner. I figure I've shelled out $60 Grand in the past 30 yrs, not including sales tax & commercial prop tx. Our lease included paying the commercial prop tx on the building we leased for 10 - 12 yrs. I feel as if I've donated enuf to the LPSB to waste away instead of doing what needed to be done. MORE MONEY WILL NOT ENSURE BROKEN TOILETS WILL BE FIXED, GRASS CUT, CAFETERIA TABLES WIPED DOWN, and so I am not willing to give more. I am encouraged Comp One; my mom's "retirement" home is bussing old voters to vote against the millage! There are a lot of old folks who realize this tax millage is bad for this community.
...
written by historyonyx , October 15, 2011 - 11:44 pm
sometimes "superintendant" means a person who maintains a building. Maybe somebody forgot that. Money has always been there but not spent on the buildings. Why not? More money will not change that. Hiring outside people only makes the cost higher. We should already have people with the job and fired for failure before spending more money. VOTE NO!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it