News -> INDReporter MON, NOV 14 12:03PM by Walter Pierce

Pierre threatens to nix debate

District 44 House of Representatives candidate Vince Pierre on Monday threatened through his campaign to boycott Monday’s scheduled debate on the UL campus if a representative of the The Independent participated as a panelist. Dr. Robert Buckman, the UL journalism professor who arranged the debate, declined to acquiesce to the Pierre campaign’s demands; Emily Henagan, a UL journalism student and Ind intern, will be part of the panel of journalists posing questions to Pierre and incumbent Rep. Rickey Hardy.

By mid-morning Monday Buckman had worked out what amounts to a compromise: Pierre agreed to attend the debate but vowed to not answer questions posed by Henagan. (The debate format stipulates that questions posed by panelists be applicable to both candidates; in other words, no “gotcha” questions will be allowed.)

Ashley LaStrapes, Pierre’s public relations representative, tells The Ind that Pierre’s attempt to block this newspaper from participating in the debate stems from what Pierre views as unfavorable coverage over the last several weeks. “Every time he’s in the paper it’s negative in relation to someone that is quote-unquote a negative figure in the community,” LaStrapes says, referring to former City-Parish Councilman Chris Williams, a lightning rod in north Lafayette politics and a former political opponent of Hardy’s whom Hardy beat in a runoff four years ago for the District 44 seat.  “[Chris Williams is] not a part of the campaign staff, but every time we talk to you guys it’s been the same thing — it’s been a question about Chris Williams,” LaStrapes adds.

In our Oct. 26 cover story, “The Ex Factor,” this newspaper examined the relationships between Williams and several campaigns including the Pierre campaign.

Hardy got 43 percent of the vote to Pierre’s 40 percent in the three-person primary Oct. 22. The third candidate, attorney Roshell Jones, received 17 percent. Jones has since endorsed Hardy for re-election. The runoff is this Saturday, Nov. 19.

Today’s debate is set for 1 p.m. in Room 241 of Burke-Hawthorne Hall.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (19)add
...
written by Stephen Handwerk , November 14, 2011 - 12:55 pm
I am glad that Vincent Pierre is going to participate in this debate, as the community certainly needs to hear from him and stooping to Rickey Hardy’s level should not be entertained.

That said, Mr. Pierre has a solid point.

The Independent’s editor helped Representative Hardy perpetrate a hoax on his very own constituents (see “Up Against – Himself” - http://www.theind.com/news/901...t--himself ) by pulling a stunt and not appearing at the first round of debates. This combined with the terribly flattering coverage that Representative Hardy has received from this publication would make even the most sober reader take pause in trying to ascertain whether this publication can be considered impartial.

But a simple review of Representative Hardy’s record (something in which he constantly refers to and used as the main reason why he didn’t need to debate anyone) you will find that more than 20% of the time Representative Hardy hasn’t even done his job – vote. Hardy missed over 20% of the votes that have been cast in his chamber since being elected. (This isn't even taking into consideration the time Hardy was accused of voting other members machines.)

And let’s look at his legislative priorities… Hardy has now made it illegal to shop at yard sales with cash! Yep with his bill to supposedly combat stolen items from being resold by would be thieves, Hardy has made Antique Businesses and perhaps even yard sales in this state prevented from accepting cash for payment. This poorly conceived piece of legislation even by the most conservative legal observers calling it unconstitutional.

And what about trying to make people who test HIV positive into virtual sex offenders? Hardy filed a bill (later pulling it after all the criticism he got over it) that would have forced incarcerated individuals into a forced HIV screening and if they test positive they would have to mail a post card with their photo and HIV status to everyone who lives within 1 mile of them. Clearly this also has constitutional and privacy concerns.

And who can forget the times Hardy has appeared as the butt of the jokes of Late Night Comedians for his legislation.

Take all of this and add to it the Positive or even unbiased reporting on Pierre by this publication… (Do a search, and just read the headlines… all slanted IMHO)

I don’t think that you combat media biased by not talking or shutting them out… but can you blame the guy for considering it?

...
written by Cracklin Patin , November 14, 2011 - 01:37 pm
Stephen Handwerk is for Vincent Pierre? And thinks the Ind is in cahoots with Hardy? Then vote for Hardy.
...
written by thetruth , November 14, 2011 - 01:59 pm
Does Stephen Handwerk have a job other than hurling BS at policical candidates?
...
written by Lindsey Thibodeaux , November 14, 2011 - 02:09 pm
@Cracklin Patin:

An argument ad hominem is hardly a justification for putting someone into elected office. It would be a hell of a lot more useful if you spent some time standing FOR something instead of against it. Blind logical fallacy is not something voters should use to inform their conscience.
...
written by Layne St.Julien , November 14, 2011 - 02:17 pm
I'm supporting Pierre, but he made a mistake in copying Hardy's earlier tactic of ducking a debate by suggesting that the questioners would be unfair to him. Hardy revealed his own fears of weakness when he was a no-show at the Progressives debate; now Pierre reveals his by threatening to bow out. So what if he's hit with hard questions? Isn't this part of the role of representing the people? Hard questions have to be addressed regardless of who poses them; unfair questions also. I wish the candidates would quit with all this drama and get on talking about the isuses. We've got plenty of them in District 44.
...
written by James Melancon , November 14, 2011 - 02:43 pm
"Hardy has now made it illegal to shop at yard sales with cash!"
--------------------

I doubt the cash rule will stand up in court since cash is legal tender. Nevertheless, Hardy's point, to prevent the sale of stolen items, is a good idea just unenforceable.

You could require the reporting of all transactions by cash but that too is an impossible law. The IRS requires the reporting of all cash transactions $10,000 and over. Also, I believe a similar rule applies to banks. How effective is this? You could consider the rule unworkable but it gives the government a tool to use on the underground economy.
...
written by Cracklin Patin , November 14, 2011 - 04:10 pm
To Lindsey Thibodeaux

It was not an ad hominem. There was no negative comments, only the association of Mr. Handwerk with Pierre. Therefore, Handwerk's ideas are usually pas bon, hence, Mr. Pierre is pas bon.

Now, back to your Philosophy 101; we expect a full report on Kant next week.
...
written by Stephen Handwerk , November 14, 2011 - 04:37 pm
James... You seem to be so willing to give Hardy a pass here. But who pays all the legal & attorney fees. The state will have to pay to descend the law (our tax dollars)... But regular citizens will have to pay to bring this to court to prove it. I am not willing to give him a pass for this. Just because it is aimed to address an agreed upon problem, doesn't mean it is not wrong headed. After all this very same logic could be applied to prevent drunk driving... Prevent the sale of alcohol. Well we all know how that worked the last time.

Cracklin... Me thinks you just perfectly defined an ad hominem attack. Perhaps a dictionary for Christmas is in order?
...
written by chalotte Thib , November 14, 2011 - 07:58 pm
Mr. Pierre is smarter than the credit given. Why would he debate Mr Hardy, knowing well that Mr. Hardy will destroy Mr. Pierre. All the smoke 'n mirrors that has worked so effectively with Mr. Pierre's supporters would evaporate. Mr. Pierre does not want be reduced to the nothing that he is...no black or white person wants that. Debating is tough, remember Nixon vs JFK!!!
...
written by James Melancon , November 14, 2011 - 09:13 pm
Stephen Handwerk "James... You seem to be so willing to give Hardy a pass here. But who pays all the legal & attorney fees. The state will have to pay"
--------------------

True but it's not the first time; it's the process. History has shown Federal, State, and Local legislative branches pass laws in contradiction of the Constitution. The laws are subject to review by the courts who can declare them unconstitutional. It's the reason Obama care is being heard by the Supreme Court.
...
written by Cracklin Patin , November 15, 2011 - 08:30 am
by Stephen Handwerk

Cracklin... Me thinks you just perfectly defined an ad hominem attack.
--------------------

No, it's guilt by association.
...
written by Cornbread5 , November 15, 2011 - 09:48 am
Pierre Killed Hardy at the debate yesterday....Is Hardy a retarded person are something Baker Huge!!! ha joke 18 and cingular merge>>>>What Hardy....Ricky is a Joke....PIerre #54 your Next and best Representative!!!!!
...
written by PetieB , November 15, 2011 - 11:17 am
Charlott I don't think Ricky Hardy can destroy anyone. If you were at the debate or checked the video on the web you would see he bumbled his way through every answer. His defended this F given by business leaders by saying that it was the 65% who did not agree with him. Duh, 65 is greater than 45. He could not defend the fact that he has run businesses in the past without registering them with the state thus avoided paying taxes. He repeatedly attacked Mr. Pierre's family and friends by stating they had committed fraud, no one in either case he pointed to has been convicted of a crime. Come on when will the light turn on for some folks.
...
written by charlotte Thib , November 15, 2011 - 08:01 pm
I was at the debate. Pierre came across like a deer in the headlights. Rep Hardy was sharp and honest. He did not bumble. OK he is not Silver Tongued Bobby or Edwin...but have we not done well with the Silver Tongued either.
...
written by brownT , November 15, 2011 - 08:29 pm
So Stephen Handwerk is for Pierre....

Guess I'll be voting for Rickey Hardy.
...
written by Cornbread2 , November 16, 2011 - 11:31 am
Pierre #54 on the ballot Hardy has no chance...I'm just saying
...
written by Tub O'Riley , November 16, 2011 - 01:21 pm
written by brownT "Stephen Handwerk is for Pierre.... "
-------------------

With Stephen behind him, you know something is rotten in Denmark, or may be Carencro.
...
written by Cornbread2 , November 17, 2011 - 10:20 am
All you naysayers said the sameg about Brandon Shelvin!!!! Look what happened!!!Go Vince GO!!!!

...
written by the original northsidian , November 17, 2011 - 11:12 am
Layne St. Julien: I guess everyone will vote for Pierre since you are backing him. The folks really listened to you when you said you were for the massize school board tax increase! You sure do have some stroke! NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it