News -> INDReporter THU, DEC 1 11:14AM by Heather Miller

C’est What? Jindal defends Occupy movement

Gov. Bobby Jindal says he identifies with the spirit of Occupy Wall Street. I repeat: Bobby Jindal has publicly sympathized with Occupy Wall Street.
 
According to a blog post on The Hill’s website, Jindal, the same Republican governor who most recently described a federal rural broadband grant for underserved north Louisiana as a destroyer of private industry, told MSNBC Thursday morning that he doesn’t “agree with some of [the OWS] tactics,” but he does believe “they’re articulating a genuine frustration from hardworking Americans:”

Jindal said the protesters represented a worry that “if we don’t fix this… they’re not going to have a chance to achieve the American dream” and defended the Republican party as having “always stood for upward mobility.”

Jindal’s comments came the morning after Republican pollster Frank Luntz gave a presentation at the Republican Governor’s Association warning the GOP about antagonizing the Occupy protesters, saying that if next year’s campaign became framed as a battle over the middle class, “Democrats will win.”

The Hill points out that Jindal’s comments create a rare split between he and fellow Republicans, the majority of whom have vilified the mass protests.

Read more here.


Comments (8)add
...
written by James Melancon , December 01, 2011 - 06:11 pm
"Jindal’s comments create a rare split between he and fellow Republicans, the majority of whom have vilified the mass protests."
----------------

Do you have evidence to backup this up?
...
written by b f , December 01, 2011 - 08:31 pm
I'm glad to see Jindal acknowledge it. One day everyone will, it will be a matter of political survival, just wait and see.

The best reporting I've seen on why EVERYONE should be aggravated with the big Wall Street firms and their tight links to our (their?) representatives in congress and the senate has been done by Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone magazine. He's one of the only reporters left who digs into the muck heap and talks about what he finds without sugar coating it with weasel words and "correct" phrasing. Who would have thought that Rolling Stone would be the last real bastion of investigative journalism in the U.S.? What does that say about the state of the media in this country?

I've long been frustrated at how oblivious the public has been to what's been going on between the Federal Reserve, the SEC, the financial "industry", their lobbyists, and congress and the senate. There was the briefest moment when the Tea Party was making stirring sounds as if it was a movement of people waking up to the corruption, but it became clear immediately that they are merely disgruntled, humiliated conservatives angry at the election of Barack Obama. I get the uneasy feeling that they don't mind getting screwed as long as the people doing the screwing are conservative. How can anyone respect that?

They could have (and still could) make a compelling case against Obama for being so cozy with the banksters, and I would be on their side if this had been their main issue, and even more so if they had equally condemned a Republican party leadership that proudly sees itself as servants not of people, but of big business and the banksters in particular. But no, their rhetoric quickly devolved into a bunch of tedious claptrap about birth certificates and "socialism" and 2nd amendment rights, all diversionary issues spoon fed to them by the same establishment that's been screwing them all along, an establishment that is acutely aware that the yellow brick road of financial/political incest leads right back to its own hallowed halls.

The people at Occupy Wall Street are focused on the banksters, the people in the Tea Party are focused on the politicians (although mostly Democrats - as if Republicans had nothing to do with the economic meltdown) but just maybe one day they will meet in the middle and finally understand it is the perverse relationship between the two that is screwing all the rest of us over so badly. Those two institutions are one big club that bully a codependent mass media into helping pre-select compliant candidates. To accomplish this they depend on a rather idiotic tendency by the American public to get 100 percent of their news from commercial television blurbs sandwiched between sporting events and reality shows about the Kardashian sisters. This way they usually get a candidate they can "work with", meaning one who'll continue to let them write legislation that won't be inspected too closely before getting signed into law.

They want us to shut up and watch television, buy their stuff, believe what they put in their campaign ads, and above all fight each other over issues which they select based on their effectiveness as diversions so we won't notice those fingers fishing around in our back pocket for our wallets.

They win because they can distract us like a bunch of dumb dogs, "Get the squirrel! Sic the Cat!" We have to stop it. We have to stop squabbling with each other and fight them or they will always win.
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 01, 2011 - 09:01 pm
"the people in the Tea Party are focused on the politicians (although mostly Democrats - as if Republicans had nothing to do with the economic meltdown)"

You're profoundly misinformed. Just ask Walter, he'll tell you all about the rift in the Republican Party between the "centrists" and "the tea party". He says it's happening nationally, and it's now going on locally, too.
...
written by Aaron , December 01, 2011 - 09:48 pm
"To accomplish this they depend on a rather idiotic tendency by the American public to get 100 percent of their news from commercial television blurbs sandwiched between sporting events and reality shows about the Kardashian sisters."

And getting your news from Rolling Stone magazine, between articles about Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga, is so much better.

...
written by ragin_cajun , December 02, 2011 - 12:10 am
"And getting your news from Rolling Stone magazine, between articles about Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga, is so much better."

Ooooohhhhhhh......
...
written by lindalu , December 02, 2011 - 03:40 am
Matt Taibbi did a good job on that article, get a reprint and see for yourself.
...
written by b f , December 02, 2011 - 04:10 am
"between articles about Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga"

Doesn't sound much different from Fox "News" to me, except that the serious reporting in Rolling Stone is superior.
...
written by cb , December 02, 2011 - 03:55 pm
Here is the full coverage of Frank Luntz speech to the Republican governors: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ti...07949.html

Jindal appears to have perfectly executed suggestion number 7.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it