News -> INDReporter MON, DEC 5 11:18AM by Walter Pierce

Downtown levy up for debate, repeal

The City-Parish Council on Tuesday will consider an introductory ordinance that would repeal the section in Lafayette’s Code of Ordinances pertaining to the Special Law Enforcement Levy charged to bars in downtown Lafayette. The levy, which is based on each bar’s capacity and ranges from $186 per month for Frankie’s Bar & Grill to Karma’s $4,870 monthly fee, has been a subject of contention between some bar owners and Lafayette Police.

The levy was created to fund extra police patrols downtown on weekends, but some bar owners recently refused to pay the monthly fee, setting up a possible showdown in state district court if Tuesday’s introductory ordinance is unsuccessful. The ordinance is sponsored by Councilman Brandon Shelvin who represents downtown Lafayette.

If passed, the ordinance will face a vote for final adoption on Dec. 20.

For some back story on the downtown security levy, see our Dec. 9, 2009 cover story, “Bar Fight.”


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (15)add
...
written by julie Calzone , December 05, 2011 - 04:49 pm
Why should the taxpayers of the Parish pay for these bars anymore? They create the problem and they should pay for it.
...
written by Southsider , December 05, 2011 - 05:08 pm
Julie...because its part of the responsibility of the LPD. Why should bar owners be taxed? If it wasn't for the bars, downtown Lafayette would still be a deserted ghetto. Its the bars that brought people back to downtown once the beautification project was finished.
...
written by James Melancon , December 05, 2011 - 06:35 pm
The power to tax is the power to destroy. In this case, the City could force bars out-of-business.
...
written by corima , December 05, 2011 - 06:49 pm
just add a cent or two to drinks served downtown
...
written by Realistic , December 05, 2011 - 07:01 pm
Southsider, would you like to pay additional taxes then in order to cover the salaries of these downtown officers while ensuring the rest of the city/parish is still covered? Or would you rather the bar owners, especially Karma and a few others to pay for the cops that are needed due to their clientele and alcohol consumption?
...
written by Just another taxpayer , December 05, 2011 - 07:02 pm
Southsider, you are absolutely correct. With few exceptions, most businesses had left downtown. A few visionaries, opened bars/restaurants in the face of the deep decline, gambling mightily to bring back the vitality than now exists once again.

DTA Alive! once supported these businesses by closing off Jefferson Street on Friday evenings, creating a fun venue whereby one could stroll up and down the street and in and out of those establishments--a great idea. Today, the entertainment is in the parks, not on Jefferson St. where most of those original places were/are. DTA Alive!, while still fun, doesn't have the same feel or vitality now, that it did when it was on J Street and it seems to detract from those businesses, rather than enhancing their revenues today. This may be a wrong conclusion on my part, but it is what I've observed and experienced in the past 25+/- years.

Don't misunderstand, I love DTA, but I think the bars & restaurants have done more than their share to make downtown what is is today. They have paid their dues and certainly deserve services they pay for with the taxes that are levied on them. And everyone seems to forget the police are there to protect all who venture downtown for whatever reason. That is part of what our taxes are supposed to provide.
...
written by ben , December 05, 2011 - 07:07 pm












If Joey could add a cent or two to drinks. He would have done it state wide a long time ago. If they would let him he would tax the world. This guy loves taxes.
...
written by The Holy Goofus , December 05, 2011 - 08:23 pm
The bars are right on this one.

The City has singled out the bars for taxation and I believe that is unconstitutional. You can't single out a certain type of business and raise taxes on them for services for which they are already taxed and paying for. The extent of the services needed is irrevelent. There is nothing in our local tax code that allows a graduated tax based on business type. The downtown art galleries, restaurants, coffee shops, and other retail businesses are also generating visitation at night. Why weren't they getting tax surcharges? The Mall and surrounding shopping centers generate a huge amount of traffic in December that requires a much expanded police presence for traffic control, traffic accidents, and other related issues. Why are they not given a tax surcharge to cover the increase in costs to the police department? What about the private schools in town...like Fatima...that require policemen twice a day for traffic control? Are they charged for the extra demand they create. I suspect not...and they don't pay any taxes to begin with.

The downtown bars are paying significant sales and property taxes already. The more business they do, the more sales taxes they pay. This is the way the system works.

The Police Department is responsible for protecting people and property. Some businesses require more attention than others. Some businesses require more attention than others only at certain times of the year...like Christmas and Mardi Gras. Some need more attention during the day, like schools. Others need more attention at night, like bars. Its the responbility or the police department to protect the businesses and the people they attract. That's why everyone pays taxes. It is the job of the Police to protect and serve. They can't come along now and say, in effect, if you don't pay extra we are not going to protect your business or your visitors. And if you don't pay, we are going to close you down. Reminds me of the Mafia...


...
written by Southsider , December 05, 2011 - 10:50 pm
Pasted:

written by Realistic , December 05, 2011 - 02:01 pm
Southsider, would you like to pay additional taxes then in order to cover the salaries of these downtown officers while ensuring the rest of the city/parish is still covered? Or would you rather the bar owners, especially Karma and a few others to pay for the cops that are needed due to their clientele and alcohol consumption?

Neither. I'd like to see cop cars parked in the parking lots of LPD instead of at homes of the officers. I'd like to see the LPD man up to their jobs, whether is patrolling the city or downtown. Taxes are paid for this. We can all complain about a certain situation(as brought up in previous comments) or we can expect the LPD to do their job with the money budgeted. As stated, why pick on the hand that feed the tax money till? As i see it, the more sucessful your business is downtown, the more tax you pay. Seems screwy to me.

Just Another..you are correct also. Once DTA left Jefferson street, the ambiance of it all went away.
...
written by Joseph Dugal , December 06, 2011 - 01:15 am
There are existing taxes on bars. When crowds get bigger, existing tax revenue gets bigger, and pays for more policeman.
A case could be made that the bars revitalized downtown - all without a government subsidy. That's the American way.
By the way, do those who want to double-tax bars also want larger families to pay higher school property taxes?
...
written by Mah Nà Mah Nà - Do doo be-do-do , December 06, 2011 - 07:04 am
Can't Joey Durel just install Redflex cameras every 50' downtown and require partiers to be surgically implanted with a RFID chip so they can be properly taxed if they make one misstep?
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 06, 2011 - 06:58 pm
Yes he can. He just hasn't made friends with anyone who owns a company that does that, yet. I'm sure as soon as somebody in town with the proper lineage opens a bio-medical monitoring company in River Ranch, Joey will award them a no bid contract, and probably create a TIF District to finance the endeavor for them, and tell us all it's just "economic development". :)
...
written by reality check , December 08, 2011 - 02:38 pm
By treating every night of bar operations as a "special event" like a parade or festival, the bars are being unfairly taxed. Any business conducted daily instead of once a year, should be covered by the police department and it can hardly be called "special". The police department has needed to grow for a number of years to cover all city growth and developing downtown high density issues. The residents needs to be considered in this matter as they are affected by whatever is going on downtown. With slums being built without any parking downtown, the pedestrian, biking and parking issues are about to grow exponentially and Shelvin would be wise to anticipate that and promote greater foot and scooter patrols downtown, day and night, as a normal and necessary expense of a growing city. Since Shelvin has supported government funded housing in his district, it would behoove him to represent the affected residential areas in this matter, which would make the bar owners less targeted and bring the matter back to reasonable and fair discussion. And while he's at it, he can promote an ordinance that no flop houses ever reestablish downtown again.
...
written by Cracklin Patin , December 08, 2011 - 08:22 pm
Prohibition Now! That will solve it.
...
written by reality check , December 08, 2011 - 10:40 pm
Attorneys for bar owners should reach out to neighborhood groups for more support on issues that are common to commercial and residential.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it