News -> INDReporter WED, JAN 25 5:39PM by Walter Pierce

Tramel: Camera enforcement makes streets safer

tramel
Tramel

Lafayette Consolidated Government’s traffic director is making a case for the efficacy of the SafeLight and SafeSpeed programs in the Hub City, namely the programs’ reduction in collisions and, by extension, the reduced need for public safety officials to respond to such collisions.

In a status report issued Wednesday afternoon, Traffic and Transportation Director Tony Tramel provides a history, analysis and revenue update on the controversial programs that were introduced to Lafayette streets in the fall of 2007. Coincidentally (or not), the report comes a day after City-Parish Council members discussed the possibility of ear-marking RedFlex revenue for purposes other than for what they were originally intended.

According to Tramel’s report, the SafeLight (camera enforcement at intersections) and SafeSpeed (the speed vans) programs have generated $10.6 million in revenue through November of last year, which represents a four-year period. Of that total, LCG has gotten $5.7 million while the vendor, RedFlex, has received $4.9 million.

Also detailed in the report is an analysis of SafeLight intersections showing a marked reduction in collisions. Using the 14-month period before the cameras were installed and comparing it to the 14-month period after the cameras were installed, the analysis shows that total crashes at these intersections fell 63 percent after the introduction of the program: 343 before installation compared to 126 after. Rear-end collisions fell the most — 69 percent — while right-angle collisions fell 51 percent.

According to Tramel’s report, the “reduction of traffic crashes appears to reflect a significant positive improvement in reducing traffic crashes related to driver behavior, which was originally identified as the principal purpose of the SafeLight/SafeSpeed programs. This reduction in traffic crashes increases the efficiency of the traffic control and traffic flow efforts, and decreases the number of serious traffic crashes to which public safety agencies must respond at the expense of taxpayers, thereby contributing to the overall public safety of Lafayette and ultimately the citizens of Lafayette.”


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (4)add
...
written by GREGORY FOREMAN , January 25, 2012 - 07:36 pm
What Tony Trammel fails to grasp is the effectiveness of the red light system is not the issue, the legality of using such a system is the issue. Many citizens would contend such unattended survellance systems are illegal and abusive on the city's part in as much as the accused, in this case the driver, is unable to confront and/or cross examine the accuser, in such cases a machine, in a court and such should be a violation of the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution.
Apparently, if one were to follow Tony Trammel's logic, effectiveness is justification enough because accidents have been reduced/speeding has been reduced, yadda/yadda/yadda. Like statistics will make everything OKedDOKee. To such apparent ignorance or should I say arrogance, I have but two comments: first, the biggest liars in the world is statistics and statisticians(sic). And, second, if effectiveness were justification for legal action, then, according to Mr. Trammel's logic, we should all be arrested and put in jail, such action would reduce crime to nothing and as such would be most effective. With everyone in jail there would be not speeding/no murders/no rapes/everything would be pure and no problems for "administrators"--and I use such an adjective quite liberally with respect to the Durel administration--such as Tony Trammel.
Later Dude
...
written by Joe LeBlanc , January 25, 2012 - 10:57 pm
Pasted:

"And, second, if effectiveness were justification for legal action, then, according to Mr. Trammel's logic, we should all be arrested and put in jail, such action would reduce crime to nothing and as such would be most effective"

If only that could become true.
...
written by Keith Bernard , January 27, 2012 - 12:06 pm
the clear motivation for the cameras is not safety, it's financial. city government found a way to generate additional revenue.
...
written by Michael A. Moss , January 29, 2012 - 05:22 pm
S. Bernard needs to use their given name. If S. Bernard does not want to do this, he or she should not be able to post. IF YOU WANT TO POST, NUT UP!!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it