A vague proposal to eliminate income taxes and hike the state sales tax has elected officials of all political persuasions nervous. By Walter Pierce
Friday, Feb. 1, 2013
Gov. Bobby Jindal has at last found the prescription for our prosperity: make life so unpleasant for the poor and working class that they leave Louisiana and move to Mississippi. Think Swift’s “Modest Proposal” without the gristle and bone. Praise be.
This is hyperbole. The poor can’t afford to move. But through his ideological aversion to government revenue, i.e., taxes, and most recently via his plan to eliminate personal and corporate income taxes and make up for the lost revenue by hiking the state sales tax, Jindal is all but ensuring that life will get a little bit harder for the poor and working poor. Just under 3.5 percent harder, according to an analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which finds that for the 20 percent of state residents at the bottom of the economic food chain, their tax burden via this swap would rise 3.4 percent. ITEP estimates that the bottom 80 percent of residents will pay more in taxes while the top 20 percent will see a net decrease in their tax burden.
Poor people in Louisiana don’t pay personal income taxes — they don’t have enough personal income. But they still have to buy stuff. Indeed the affluent will pay more total sales taxes because they buy more stuff. But the poor pay a larger percentage of their income on stuff.
This is classic trickle-down economics — help the “makers” by lowering their taxes and increasing their wealth and they’ll create jobs and prosperity for us “takers.” Unicorns and rainbows will ensue. Everybody gets laid. It’s an enduring mystery how supply-side economics isn’t as discredited in theory as it is in practice. Wealthy people don’t create jobs — middle class demand for goods and services does. But that’s another argument.
The devil is in the details with Jindal’s tax swap, and the administration hasn’t exactly been a fount of specifics. But there’s an aspect of this tax plan that has politicians of every political stripe sweating: Will any taxing authority — a city, a parish, a police jury, a school board — be able to convince voters to pass a sales or property tax in the future if Jindal’s tax swap is adopted by the Legislature this spring?
In terms of sales tax, Lafayette is relatively low-rent. Shoppers in the city limits pay 8 cents in sales taxes on every dollar: 4 cents go to the state, 2 cents go to the school board and the remaining 2 go to the city.
By most accounts Jindal’s still-vague swap would require raising the state sales tax by 3 cents — from 4 to 7 cents on every dollar purchase — for the plan to be “revenue neutral.” So let’s add that 3 cents to Lafayette’s sales tax rate. For every dollar spent in the city of Lafayette a shopper would pay 11 cents. Eleven cents on the dollar. Seem a little onerous?
Compare it to neighboring cities. To the east, St. Martinville’s sales tax is 8.5 cents, so they go up to 11.5. Crowley to the west and Abbeville to the south each have a 9.5 cent sales tax rate, and up north in Opelousas the current sales tax is 9.75 cents. Shoppers in Opelousas, if the swap is approved, would pay 12.5 cents on every dollar.
Don’t think for a second the tax swap doesn’t have Lafayette schools Superintendent Dr. Pat Cooper concerned. He’s been lobbying for putting a temporary (six years) 1-cent sales tax for facilities improvements before voters in November. And, according to a reliable source, Jindal’s tax swap plan — and the lack of details surrounding it — is the main reason why the Lafayette City-Parish Council in late January approved a resolution canceling a November ballot prop asking voters to increase the property tax devoted to our Parks & Recreation Department. Council members say publicly they want a comprehensive review of all taxes in Lafayette first, but they know if the state sales tax goes up 3 cents there’s no way voters will approve additional taxes for soccer fields and rec centers.
Jindal will probably get what he wants with the tax swap, whatever that is. He usually does. But will it be at the expense — literally — of every city, parish and school system in the state?
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
SEP 30 Here's another story that makes Louisiana look backward; blogger Manny Schewitz writes about a church that won't allow AA to use its facilities because those boozers might track in some gay. Every time he sees one of these, as he calls them "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" type of stories, he always starts wishing: "Please don't let it be Louisiana... Please don't let it be Louisiana..."
SEP 30 Blogger Bob Mann is asking a question that a lot of intelligent people have been asking for several years now - "How gullible does Bobby Jindal think we are?" In this post, Mann is taking a look at the Jindal administration's "smarmy, shameless reliance on our ignorance."
SEP 30 Ever wonder what goes on in a football locker room following a game like Sunday's embarrassment? Here's a post on ESPN about the "reality check" the Saints had. Among the comments: "Right now we're not a very good football team."
SEP 30 Just for fun, here's the Advocate's "Mike and Me" gallery, featuring submitted photos from readers who have taken pictures with LSU's mascot, Mike the Tiger. When the promotion started, the paper expected pictures with the big cat who lives outside the stadium, and they got those, but they also got pictures with the "human" version, and the big statue of Mike.
SEP 30 Anybody who has attended LSU since the late 1980s is pretty familiar with Highland Coffees. It's a cool little (non-chain) coffee shop near the north gates of the university. The recent announcement that it would be moving because the shop can't "come to terms" with its landlord has caused horror and anguish among LSU students and alums. This post on the Red Shtick pokes fun at the landlord who might have other plans for the spot. (The story includes links to a "real" post on Baton Rouge Business Report).
SEP 30 Bobby Jindal probably has a shiny idea of what his legacy will be, and it's a sure bet it doesn't match up with what columnist Clancy DuBos says in this post on Gambit, to wit: "Jindal will be remembered as the governor who lacked the guts and integrity to do what's right." Man, DuBos, don't hold back -- tell us how you really feel.
SEP 30 It's a good thing we got all that BP money to spend on tourism advertising, because plenty will be required to convince people that we aren't a bunch of gun-toting lunatics down here in the swamp. This post on TIME magazine can't help: it's about a Port Allen restauranteur who offers a discount to anybody with a gun. (Anybody? Hmmm.)
SEP 30 This post on PoliticusUSA, an extremely liberal blog, takes aim at Bobby Jindal's disingenuous attempts to play both sides against the middle on the evolution/creationism issue. Jindal is "dutifully serving his Koch masters" on the climate change issue as well, blogger Rmuse writes.
SEP 29 Here's another national media story on Edwin W. Edwards, this one from National Public Radio - despite the fact that, he says, "people who listen to public radio don't vote for candidates like me." His story, with the young lovely wife, new baby, political backstory and criminal history, seems to be irresistible to the media, especially after they've met him and experienced the full force of the Edwards charm.
SEP 29 Here's more speculation on what's next in the Bruce Greenstein situation from the fourth estate. James Gill calls it "the Greenstein problem." What's the problem? If Greenstein lied about the process of awarding a huge contract to his former employer during an investigation, as is alleged in his indictiment, what's the truth? And who else was involved?
SEP 29 To be fair, this story was posted on Business Insider before Sunday's game (and the wailing and gnashing of teeth that followed it). It's about a study that looked at the communities in which NFL teams are based, and what kind of support those teams have there. No team has stronger community support than the Saints, the study found. (But again, that was before Sunday.)
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly